From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, brijesh.singh@amd.com
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>,
Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>,
Michael Roth <Michael.Roth@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/28] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210827073334.y26sihpldsyfvusz@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210630125321.30278-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Hi,
[ /me reading through a bunch of old threads .... ]
> Many of the integrity guarantees of SEV-SNP are enforced through a new
> structure called the Reverse Map Table (RMP). Adding a new page to SEV-SNP
> VM requires a 2-step process. First, the hypervisor assigns a page to the
> guest using the new RMPUPDATE instruction. This transitions the page to
> guest-invalid. Second, the guest validates the page using the new PVALIDATE
> instruction.
Intel TDX names this "accepting pages", but it is basically the same
concept, correct?
If so I see opportunities to share code here. The problem of tracking
which pages are validated/accepted and which are not should be the same
for both TDX and SEV-SNP. The overall workflow (which phase
validates/accepts which pages etc.) should be identical too.
> At this time we only support the pre-validation. OVMF detects all the available
> system RAM in the PEI phase. When SEV-SNP is enabled, the memory is validated
> before it is made available to the EDK2 core.
How do you detect memory? Intel wants pass a hob with a memory map (and
possibly more config info) to the early boot code, and I'm wondering why
TDX needs that while SEV-SNP apparently doesn't (at least I havn't
noticed anything similar while going over the patches quickly).
thanks,
Gerd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-27 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 12:52 [RFC PATCH v5 00/28] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) support Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/28] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: move SEV specific code in a separate file Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/28] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: add the macro to invoke MSR protocol based VMGEXIT Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/28] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: add the macro to request guest termination Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/28] OvmfPkg: reserve SNP secrets page Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/28] OvmfPkg: reserve CPUID page for SEV-SNP Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/28] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: introduce SEV-SNP boot block GUID Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/28] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: pre-validate the data pages used in SEC phase Brijesh Singh
2021-07-31 8:44 ` Erdem Aktas
2021-08-03 15:10 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/28] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: invalidate the GHCB page Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/28] OvmfPkg/ResetVector: check the vmpl level Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/28] UefiCpuPkg: Define the SEV-SNP specific dynamic PCDs Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: add MemEncryptSevSnpEnabled() Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/28] OvmfPkg/SecMain: register GHCB gpa for the SEV-SNP guest Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/28] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: " Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/28] OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe: do not use extended PCI config space Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: add support to validate system RAM Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/28] OvmfPkg/BaseMemEncryptSevLib: skip the pre-validated " Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: add support to validate > 4GB memory in PEI phase Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/28] OvmfPkg/SecMain: pre-validate the memory used for decompressing Fv Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/28] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: validate the system RAM when SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 20/28] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: set the SEV-SNP enabled PCD Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 21/28] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: set the Hypervisor Features PCD Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 22/28] MdePkg/GHCB: increase the GHCB protocol max version Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 23/28] UefiCpuPkg/MpLib: add support to register GHCB GPA when SEV-SNP is enabled Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 24/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: change the page state in the RMP table Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 25/28] OvmfPkg/MemEncryptSevLib: skip page state change for Mmio address Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 26/28] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Use SEV-SNP AP Creation NAE event to launch APs Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 27/28] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: mark cpuid and secrets memory reserved in EFI map Brijesh Singh
2021-06-30 12:53 ` [RFC PATCH v5 28/28] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: expose the SNP reserved pages through configuration table Brijesh Singh
2021-08-27 7:33 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210827073334.y26sihpldsyfvusz@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox