From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, jiaqi.gao@intel.com
Cc: "Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"Bi, Dandan" <dandan.bi@intel.com>,
"gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Zimmer, Vincent" <vincent.zimmer@intel.com>,
"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
"Xu, Min M" <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC] Design review for Lazy Page Accept in TDVF
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:10:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210831061037.7imk7cip2wh6q3vm@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5484D7B4F68DFBDF53AD2454F2CB9@BN9PR11MB5484.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:49:27AM +0000, Gao, Jiaqi wrote:
> Motivation: Intel TDX provides memory encryption and integrity
> multi-tenancy for hardware protection. A TD-guest uses TDCALL to
> accept shared memory as private. However, accept whole system memory
> may take a long time which will have an adverse impact on the boot
> time performance.
Which order of magnitude do we talk about?
How long would it take to accept 2G of memory (all memory below 4g on
qemu q35) ?
> We propose three options to address this issue:
> 1. Modifying the memory allocation (MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem) logic to accept memory when OUT_OF_RESOURCE occurs.
> 2. Changing the process flow of QEMU direct boot and GRUB to accept memory when loading the image fails and returns OUT_OF_RESOURCE.
> 3. Adding AcceptMemory() as a boot service interface to simplify the implementation of option 2.
> Underlying implementation of accepting memory is provided by a protocol which can be installed by architecture-specific drivers such as TdxDxe.
(1) Looks best to me. From a design point of view it is a very
reasonable thing for the core memory manager to also manage the
accepted/unaccepted state of memory. It avoids duplicating the
"oom -> try AcceptMemoryRessource()" logic in bootloaders and
will also cover other oom situations.
take care,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-31 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-30 7:49 [edk2-devel] [RFC] Design review for Lazy Page Accept in TDVF jiaqi.gao
2021-08-31 6:10 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2021-09-01 7:23 ` Gao, Jiaqi
2021-09-03 0:31 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-03 5:56 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-03 12:34 ` Gao, Jiaqi
2021-09-03 12:34 ` Gao, Jiaqi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210831061037.7imk7cip2wh6q3vm@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox