From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: "Xu, Min M" <min.m.xu@intel.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH V7 1/1] OvmfPkg: Enable TDX in ResetVector
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:37:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210924053713.fy4ulz3ykbs4xqka@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB488574F0233C7BB5A48F16E98CA39@PH0PR11MB4885.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 02:19:17PM +0000, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> All fields in TDX metadata are required. So the current SEV proposal
> (3 fields) does not work for TDX. The extra fields are used to guide
> VMM on how to copy the binary, allocate memory,
--verbose please.
The VMM loads the firmware just fine today without that metadata because
it's defined by the x86 architecture how to the firmware must be loaded.
And note that we are discussing an unified normal/sev/tdx firmware
binary here, so the "we might do something completely different for
tdx in the future" argument isn't very convincing here.
take care,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-24 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-21 9:05 [PATCH V7 0/1] Add Intel TDX support in OvmfPkg/ResetVector Min Xu
2021-09-21 9:05 ` [PATCH V7 1/1] OvmfPkg: Enable TDX in ResetVector Min Xu
2021-09-22 7:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-23 0:38 ` Min Xu
2021-09-23 8:48 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-23 11:39 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-23 12:54 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-09-23 13:18 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-23 13:19 ` [edk2-devel] " Min Xu
2021-09-23 13:38 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-23 14:03 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-09-23 14:15 ` Min Xu
2021-09-23 14:19 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-24 5:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2021-09-24 7:36 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-24 9:24 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-24 9:55 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-24 5:28 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-24 6:55 ` Min Xu
2021-09-24 10:07 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-24 10:33 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-24 14:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-24 16:40 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-27 8:05 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-27 10:05 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-27 14:59 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-28 0:21 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-24 7:32 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-24 9:15 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-24 4:54 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-24 7:39 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-24 9:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-24 10:11 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-24 10:38 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-09-24 11:17 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-09-24 11:29 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-09-24 10:14 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-09-24 10:58 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-09-25 0:03 ` Min Xu
2021-09-25 3:21 ` Brijesh Singh
2021-09-25 23:17 ` [edk2-devel] " Min Xu
2021-09-25 23:30 ` Yao, Jiewen
2021-09-27 8:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210924053713.fy4ulz3ykbs4xqka@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox