From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.5453.1634274080201195507
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Thu, 14 Oct 2021 22:01:20 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ne3+pEum;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.133.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1634274079;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=juIdd1ejCGIvzMmR2Sb4LO4bqPcBqj6siyuM+K1Fe2Y=;
	b=Ne3+pEum4ZEGi57BngnkGaEqVPCrPmUQ3MyygoyRq/4ud2zP2UR0O3Bfa2G0Y1gW2EyA14
	vdQFAkZDMcdGxPnENNPJSiaJBAxXoq9mFE3NzkEakJBfkfj1BiAmjJzWz37LN8vjoGP0EM
	zf+pUzL9Ced/U8q0zS7fTK1UX5Ql5bw=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-112-jvJ3FpgbO2GKCBTXxx52lg-1; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 01:01:16 -0400
X-MC-Unique: jvJ3FpgbO2GKCBTXxx52lg-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E3810A8E00;
	Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:01:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.192.23])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F645F4E3;
	Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:01:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 121B61800393; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:01:11 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 07:01:11 +0200
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	Michael Roth <Michael.Roth@amd.com>,
	Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: update the fdf to use new workarea PCD
Message-ID: <20211015050111.torpb3bmvcqfvsgg@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
References: <20211014181711.784074-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
 <20211014181711.784074-3-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211014181711.784074-3-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
	auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kraxel@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 01:17:11PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> The commit 80e67af9afca added support for the generic work area concept
> used mainly by the encrypted VMs but missed update the AmdSev package.
> 
> Fixes: 80e67af9afca ("OvmfPkg: introduce a common work area")

Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

take care,
  Gerd