From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.3889.1634705937333847869
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:58:58 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OCgCs5Ds;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.133.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1634705936;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=w7TOFlZfnyP2Ug8mHlhx+K852qsV9GAIh2BWsd7QbAw=;
	b=OCgCs5Dso7UTOoNFSuyULf1cfF28wjt+TqqqZkBIX6JTsp8ERNJiP62JRHYoKRVNqMUDPJ
	PouTKs5MUnAS4Hl3d+E1y0FYHh21GAn3TE1UWbiRbvic5re1LqkdDFmozlcxsvsMEWTe88
	Q250NaOBtUPxJCSbhGmFp2PIuazhlPs=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-474-z8QGapU9NFyjLHbturiLsg-1; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:58:52 -0400
X-MC-Unique: z8QGapU9NFyjLHbturiLsg-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06BAA802575;
	Wed, 20 Oct 2021 04:58:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.192.23])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFCDC69119;
	Wed, 20 Oct 2021 04:58:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CBD03180092E; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:58:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:58:48 +0200
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	Michael Roth <Michael.Roth@amd.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
	Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 22/32] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: use PcdConfidentialComputingAttr to check SEV status
Message-ID: <20211020045848.zfynvrn6zn3desxl@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
References: <20211019193934.1052465-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
 <20211019193934.1052465-23-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211019193934.1052465-23-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
	auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kraxel@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 02:39:24PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3275
> 
> Previous commit introduced a generic confidential computing PCD that can
> determine whether AMD SEV-ES is enabled. Update the MpInitLib to drop the
> PcdSevEsIsEnabled in favor of PcdConfidentialComputingAttr.

Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>