From: "Sheng Wei" <w.sheng@intel.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>,
Jenny Huang <jenny.huang@intel.com>,
Robert Kowalewski <robert.kowalewski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] IntelSiliconPkg/VTd: Fix typos
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 16:37:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211207083745.9940-2-w.sheng@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211207083745.9940-1-w.sheng@intel.com>
It is DRHD(DMA Remapping Hardware Unit Definition).
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3622
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
Cc: Jenny Huang <jenny.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Robert Kowalewski <robert.kowalewski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sheng Wei <w.sheng@intel.com>
---
.../IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDmarPei/DmarTable.c | 12 ++++++------
.../IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmarAcpiTable.c | 12 ++++++------
.../IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdPmrPei/DmarTable.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDmarPei/DmarTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDmarPei/DmarTable.c
index 2154690d..e9c99d0a 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDmarPei/DmarTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDmarPei/DmarTable.c
@@ -539,14 +539,14 @@ RegisterPciDevice (
}
/**
- Process DMAR DHRD table.
+ Process DMAR DRHD table.
@param[in] VTdUnitInfo The VTd engine unit information.
@param[in] DmarDrhd The DRHD table.
**/
VOID
-ProcessDhrd (
+ProcessDrhd (
IN VTD_UNIT_INFO *VTdUnitInfo,
IN EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *DmarDrhd
)
@@ -581,10 +581,10 @@ ProcessDhrd (
if ((DmarDrhd->Flags & EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_FLAGS_INCLUDE_PCI_ALL) != 0) {
VTdUnitInfo->PciDeviceInfo.IncludeAllFlag = TRUE;
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDhrd: with INCLUDE ALL\n"));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDrhd: with INCLUDE ALL\n"));
} else {
VTdUnitInfo->PciDeviceInfo.IncludeAllFlag = FALSE;
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDhrd: without INCLUDE ALL\n"));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDrhd: without INCLUDE ALL\n"));
}
VTdUnitInfo->PciDeviceInfo.PciDeviceDataNumber = 0;
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ ProcessDhrd (
return;
}
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDhrd: "));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDrhd: "));
switch (DmarDevScopeEntry->Type) {
case EFI_ACPI_DEVICE_SCOPE_ENTRY_TYPE_PCI_ENDPOINT:
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"PCI Endpoint"));
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ ParseDmarAcpiTableDrhd (
switch (DmarHeader->Type) {
case EFI_ACPI_DMAR_TYPE_DRHD:
ASSERT (VtdIndex < VtdUnitNumber);
- ProcessDhrd (&VTdInfo->VtdUnitInfo[VtdIndex], (EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *) DmarHeader);
+ ProcessDrhd (&VTdInfo->VtdUnitInfo[VtdIndex], (EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *) DmarHeader);
VtdIndex++;
break;
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmarAcpiTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmarAcpiTable.c
index 1ee290b7..75fbd53e 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmarAcpiTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/DmarAcpiTable.c
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ GetPciBusDeviceFunction (
}
/**
- Process DMAR DHRD table.
+ Process DMAR DRHD table.
@param[in] VtdIndex The index of VTd engine.
@param[in] DmarDrhd The DRHD table.
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ GetPciBusDeviceFunction (
@retval EFI_SUCCESS The DRHD table is processed.
**/
EFI_STATUS
-ProcessDhrd (
+ProcessDrhd (
IN UINTN VtdIndex,
IN EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *DmarDrhd
)
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ ProcessDhrd (
if ((DmarDrhd->Flags & EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_FLAGS_INCLUDE_PCI_ALL) != 0) {
mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].PciDeviceInfo.IncludeAllFlag = TRUE;
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDhrd: with INCLUDE ALL\n"));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDrhd: with INCLUDE ALL\n"));
Status = ScanAllPciBus((VOID *)VtdIndex, DmarDrhd->SegmentNumber, ScanBusCallbackRegisterPciDevice);
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ ProcessDhrd (
}
} else {
mVtdUnitInformation[VtdIndex].PciDeviceInfo.IncludeAllFlag = FALSE;
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDhrd: without INCLUDE ALL\n"));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDrhd: without INCLUDE ALL\n"));
}
DmarDevScopeEntry = (EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DEVICE_SCOPE_STRUCTURE_HEADER *)((UINTN)(DmarDrhd + 1));
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ ProcessDhrd (
return Status;
}
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDhrd: "));
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO," ProcessDrhd: "));
switch (DmarDevScopeEntry->Type) {
case EFI_ACPI_DEVICE_SCOPE_ENTRY_TYPE_PCI_ENDPOINT:
DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO,"PCI Endpoint"));
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ ParseDmarAcpiTableDrhd (
switch (DmarHeader->Type) {
case EFI_ACPI_DMAR_TYPE_DRHD:
ASSERT (VtdIndex < mVtdUnitNumber);
- Status = ProcessDhrd (VtdIndex, (EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *)DmarHeader);
+ Status = ProcessDrhd (VtdIndex, (EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *)DmarHeader);
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
return Status;
}
diff --git a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdPmrPei/DmarTable.c b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdPmrPei/DmarTable.c
index d920d136..1bb74f40 100644
--- a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdPmrPei/DmarTable.c
+++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdPmrPei/DmarTable.c
@@ -356,14 +356,14 @@ GetVtdEngineNumber (
}
/**
- Process DMAR DHRD table.
+ Process DMAR DRHD table.
@param[in] VTdInfo The VTd engine context information.
@param[in] VtdIndex The index of VTd engine.
@param[in] DmarDrhd The DRHD table.
**/
VOID
-ProcessDhrd (
+ProcessDrhd (
IN VTD_INFO *VTdInfo,
IN UINTN VtdIndex,
IN EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *DmarDrhd
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ ParseDmarAcpiTableDrhd (
switch (DmarHeader->Type) {
case EFI_ACPI_DMAR_TYPE_DRHD:
ASSERT (VtdIndex < VtdUnitNumber);
- ProcessDhrd (VTdInfo, VtdIndex, (EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *)DmarHeader);
+ ProcessDrhd (VTdInfo, VtdIndex, (EFI_ACPI_DMAR_DRHD_HEADER *)DmarHeader);
VtdIndex++;
break;
--
2.16.2.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-07 8:37 [PATCH v2 0/4] There are 4 patches for VTd drivers Sheng Wei
2021-12-07 8:37 ` Sheng Wei [this message]
2021-12-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] IntelSiliconPkg/VTd: Update VTd register structs Sheng Wei
2021-12-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] IntelSiliconPkg/VTd: Support VTd Abort DMA Mode Sheng Wei
2021-12-07 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] IntelSiliconPkg/VTd: Only generate PEI DMA buffer once Sheng Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211207083745.9940-2-w.sheng@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox