From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.38918.1639564913467957670
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Wed, 15 Dec 2021 02:41:53 -0800
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Oljd3LJY;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.129.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1639564912;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=E+Cr8dEjVl5ZcNJyc7RGP+fgQ4Vkxt2PHRCHhVAKiZo=;
	b=Oljd3LJY9wJf3xNzc4CpnKeNfmKjwpcXW/iBc8c1/iqYgnNWyFWhoatEOg0aSdgCuk5N2c
	Xs/AqyMf/ZSk17vo0CifMLcLN0s19U5ZIXCxCxueMM3lZ+8f+mOb4/dCeYCVXIOxdu2c9p
	xy2eaFI0BNWtTP2PP+cYlM5ARZnFqeo=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-201-B-yXiKrTMbaa_vNsMlRjfQ-1; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 05:41:49 -0500
X-MC-Unique: B-yXiKrTMbaa_vNsMlRjfQ-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0984A104ECE7;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:41:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.192.14])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36BB477444;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:41:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4D168180039F; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:41:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:41:44 +0100
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com>,
	Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Introduce TDVF Config-B (basic) in OvmfPkg
Message-ID: <20211215104144.xlyh3xizpnigpk25@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
References: <20211214134126.869-1-min.m.xu@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211214134126.869-1-min.m.xu@intel.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
	auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kraxel@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

  Hi,

> Patch 2/3:
> This patch-set leverage the PrePiLib and MemoryAllocationLib in
> EmbeddedPkg. Some new funtions are added to meet the Tdvf Config-B
> requirement.

Care to explain why this is needed?  How is tdvf different from other
pei-less platforms?  Could we just place DXEFV directly in the firmware
image, without wrapping it into FVMAIN_COMPACT for compression?

take care,
  Gerd