From: "Joseph Hemann" <joseph.hemann@arm.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: nd@arm.com, Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] uefi-sct/SctPkg: TCG2 Protocol: add HashLogExtendEvent test
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:58:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220109205827.3608758-5-Joseph.hemann@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220109205827.3608758-1-Joseph.hemann@arm.com>
-add initial TCG2 protocol test for HashLogExtendEvent()
-checkpoint for test of function with invalid parameters
-checkpoint for test of function with valid parameters
V2:
-fix issue with reused Assertion Guid
Signed-off-by: Joseph Hemann <Joseph.hemann@arm.com>
Change-Id: I126f2c6316f8469455f8e2a19ca7e945e9d5d6ae
---
.../EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c | 12 +
.../EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h | 29 ++
.../TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTest.h | 29 ++
.../TCG2ProtocolBBTestConformance.c | 281 ++++++++++++++++++
.../BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestMain.c | 9 +
5 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c
index 0497f08f..ed013744 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.c
@@ -37,3 +37,15 @@ EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid003 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTI
EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid004 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_004_GUID;
EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid005 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_005_GUID;
+
+EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid006 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_006_GUID;
+
+EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid007 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_007_GUID;
+
+EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid008 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_008_GUID;
+
+EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid009 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_009_GUID;
+
+EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid010 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_010_GUID;
+
+EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid011 = EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_011_GUID;
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h
index f470255c..45c2b2b2 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/Guid.h
@@ -51,3 +51,32 @@ extern EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid004;
extern EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid005;
+#define EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_006_GUID \
+{ 0xa8e1b5e6, 0xfc09, 0x461c, {0xb0, 0xe9, 0x2a, 0x49, 0xcd, 0x25, 0xc1, 0x24 }}
+
+extern EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid006;
+
+#define EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_007_GUID \
+{ 0x26f04a9b, 0x7b7a, 0x4f47, {0xbe, 0xa8, 0xb1, 0xa6, 0x02, 0x65, 0x19, 0x8a }}
+
+extern EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid007;
+
+#define EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_008_GUID \
+{ 0x4d1d9985, 0x91e2, 0x4948, {0x89, 0x16, 0xbb, 0x98, 0x13, 0x62, 0x39, 0x1d }}
+
+extern EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid008;
+
+#define EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_009_GUID \
+{ 0xfb59cab7, 0x4f8c, 0x4ded, {0xa4, 0x1c, 0xc8, 0x41, 0x20, 0x1c, 0x37, 0x22 }}
+
+extern EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid009;
+
+#define EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_010_GUID \
+{ 0x0363d22f, 0xc66a, 0x4872, {0xa5, 0x46, 0x06, 0x7f, 0x6a, 0x0d, 0xdb, 0xcd }}
+
+extern EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid010;
+
+#define EFI_TEST_TCG2CONFORMANCE_ASSERTION_011_GUID \
+{ 0x9cd6d636, 0x603a, 0x4b78, {0x80, 0xa3, 0xa3, 0xb9, 0xcc, 0x6a, 0x0b, 0x08 }}
+
+extern EFI_GUID gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid011;
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTest.h b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTest.h
index ed65bc97..1b56852e 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTest.h
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTest.h
@@ -40,6 +40,15 @@ Abstract:
#define EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL_TEST_ENTRY_GUID0102 \
{0x847f1ae0, 0xb429, 0x49f1, {0x9e, 0x0c, 0x8f, 0x43, 0xfb, 0x55, 0x34, 0x54} }
+#define EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL_TEST_ENTRY_GUID0103 \
+ {0x907a7878, 0xb294, 0xf147, {0xe9, 0x0a, 0x65, 0x43, 0xab, 0x55, 0x76, 0x46} }
+
+#define EV_POST_CODE 0x01
+
+#define EFI_TCG2_EXTEND_ONLY 0x0000000000000001
+
+#define PE_COFF_IMAGE 0x0000000000000010
+
EFI_STATUS
EFIAPI
BBTestTCG2ProtocolUnload (
@@ -76,6 +85,18 @@ BBTestGetActivePcrBanksConformanceTestCheckpoint2 (
IN EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL *TCG2
);
+EFI_STATUS
+BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTestCheckpoint1 (
+ IN EFI_STANDARD_TEST_LIBRARY_PROTOCOL *StandardLib,
+ IN EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL *TCG2
+ );
+
+EFI_STATUS
+BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTestCheckpoint2 (
+ IN EFI_STANDARD_TEST_LIBRARY_PROTOCOL *StandardLib,
+ IN EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL *TCG2
+ );
+
EFI_STATUS
BBTestGetCapabilityConformanceTest (
IN EFI_BB_TEST_PROTOCOL *This,
@@ -92,3 +113,11 @@ BBTestGetActivePcrBanksConformanceTest (
IN EFI_HANDLE SupportHandle
);
+EFI_STATUS
+BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTest (
+ IN EFI_BB_TEST_PROTOCOL *This,
+ IN VOID *ClientInterface,
+ IN EFI_TEST_LEVEL TestLevel,
+ IN EFI_HANDLE SupportHandle
+ );
+
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestConformance.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestConformance.c
index c7b326cd..874e4eb8 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestConformance.c
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestConformance.c
@@ -135,6 +135,57 @@ BBTestGetActivePcrBanksConformanceTest (
return EFI_SUCCESS;
}
+/**
+ * @brief Entrypoint for HashLogExtendEvent() Function Test.
+ * 2 checkpoints will be tested.
+ * @param This a pointer of EFI_BB_TEST_PROTOCOL
+ * @param ClientInterface A pointer to the interface array under test
+ * @param TestLevel Test "thoroughness" control
+ * @param SupportHandle A handle containing protocols required
+ * @return EFI_SUCCESS
+ * @return EFI_NOT_FOUND
+ */
+
+EFI_STATUS
+BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTest (
+ IN EFI_BB_TEST_PROTOCOL *This,
+ IN VOID *ClientInterface,
+ IN EFI_TEST_LEVEL TestLevel,
+ IN EFI_HANDLE SupportHandle
+ )
+{
+ EFI_STANDARD_TEST_LIBRARY_PROTOCOL *StandardLib;
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL *TCG2;
+ //
+ // init
+ //
+ TCG2 = (EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL*)ClientInterface;
+
+ // Ensure Protocol not NULL
+ if (TCG2 == NULL)
+ return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
+
+ // Get the Standard Library Interface
+ //
+ Status = gtBS->HandleProtocol (
+ SupportHandle,
+ &gEfiStandardTestLibraryGuid,
+ (VOID **) &StandardLib
+ );
+ if (EFI_ERROR(Status)) {
+ return Status;
+ }
+
+ //Test Using NULL Pointer
+ BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTestCheckpoint1 (StandardLib, TCG2);
+
+ //Test with correct size field
+ BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTestCheckpoint2 (StandardLib, TCG2);
+
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
EFI_STATUS
BBTestGetCapabilityConformanceTestCheckpoint1 (
IN EFI_STANDARD_TEST_LIBRARY_PROTOCOL *StandardLib,
@@ -478,3 +529,233 @@ BBTestGetActivePcrBanksConformanceTestCheckpoint2 (
return EFI_SUCCESS;
}
+
+EFI_STATUS
+BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTestCheckpoint1 (
+ IN EFI_STANDARD_TEST_LIBRARY_PROTOCOL *StandardLib,
+ IN EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL *TCG2
+ )
+{
+ EFI_TEST_ASSERTION AssertionType;
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ UINT64 Flags = 0;
+ EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS DataToHash;
+ UINT64 DataToHashLen;
+ EFI_TCG2_EVENT *EfiTcgEvent;
+ const CHAR16 *EventData = L"TCG2 Protocol Test";
+ const CHAR16 *Str = L"The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog";
+ UINT32 EfiTcgEventSize = sizeof(EFI_TCG2_EVENT) + SctStrSize(EventData);
+
+ DataToHash = Str;
+ DataToHashLen = SctStrLen(Str);
+
+ Status = gtBS->AllocatePool (
+ EfiBootServicesData,
+ EfiTcgEventSize,
+ (VOID **)&EfiTcgEvent
+ );
+
+ EfiTcgEvent->Header.HeaderSize = sizeof(EFI_TCG2_EVENT_HEADER);
+ EfiTcgEvent->Header.EventType = EV_POST_CODE;
+ EfiTcgEvent->Header.PCRIndex = 16;
+ EfiTcgEvent->Size = EfiTcgEvent->Header.HeaderSize + SctStrSize(EventData);
+
+ // Ensure HashLogExtendEvent returns Invalid Parameter when passing in NULL DataToHash pointer
+ // EFI Protocol Spec Section 6.6.5 #1
+ Status = TCG2->HashLogExtendEvent (
+ TCG2,
+ Flags,
+ NULL,
+ 0,
+ EfiTcgEvent);
+
+ if (EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER != Status) {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+ } else {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ }
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid006,
+ L"TCG2_PROTOCOL.HashLogExtendEvent - Test with NULL DataToHash Pointer should return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ // Ensure HashLogExtendEvent returns Invalid Parameter when passing in NULL EfiTcgEvent pointer
+ // EFI Protocol Spec Section 6.6.5 #1
+ Status = TCG2->HashLogExtendEvent (
+ TCG2,
+ Flags,
+ DataToHash,
+ DataToHashLen,
+ NULL);
+
+ if (EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER != Status) {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+ } else {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ }
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid007,
+ L"TCG2_PROTOCOL.HashLogExtendEvent - Test with NULL EfiTcgEvent Pointer should return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ // Ensure HashLogExtendEvent returns Invalid Parameter when passed in EventSize < HeaderSize + sizeof(UINT32)
+ // EFI Protocol Spec Section 6.6.5 #2
+ EfiTcgEvent->Size = EfiTcgEvent->Header.HeaderSize + sizeof(UINT32) - 1;
+
+ Status = TCG2->HashLogExtendEvent (
+ TCG2,
+ Flags,
+ DataToHash,
+ DataToHashLen,
+ EfiTcgEvent);
+
+ if (EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER != Status) {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+ } else {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ }
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid008,
+ L"TCG2_PROTOCOL.HashLogExtendEvent - Test with Event.Size < Event.Header.HeaderSize + sizeof(UINT32) should return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ // Ensure HashLogExtendEvent returns Invalid Parameter when passing in PCR Index > 23
+ // EFI Protocol Spec Section 6.6.5 #3
+ EfiTcgEvent->Header.PCRIndex = 24;
+ EfiTcgEvent->Size = EfiTcgEvent->Header.HeaderSize + SctStrSize(EventData);
+
+ Status = TCG2->HashLogExtendEvent (
+ TCG2,
+ Flags,
+ DataToHash,
+ DataToHashLen,
+ EfiTcgEvent);
+
+ if (EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER != Status) {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+ } else {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ }
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid009,
+ L"TCG2_PROTOCOL.HashLogExtendEvent - Test with PCRIndex > 23 should return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+EFI_STATUS
+BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTestCheckpoint2 (
+ IN EFI_STANDARD_TEST_LIBRARY_PROTOCOL *StandardLib,
+ IN EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL *TCG2
+ )
+{
+ EFI_TCG2_EVENT *EfiTcgEvent;
+ EFI_TEST_ASSERTION AssertionType;
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ UINT64 Flags = 0;
+ EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS DataToHash;
+ UINT64 DataToHashLen;
+ const CHAR16 *Str = L"The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog";
+ const CHAR16 *EventData = L"TCG2 Protocol Test";
+ UINT32 EfiTcgEventSize = sizeof(EFI_TCG2_EVENT) + SctStrSize(EventData);
+
+ DataToHash = Str;
+ DataToHashLen = SctStrLen(Str);
+
+ Status = gtBS->AllocatePool (
+ EfiBootServicesData,
+ EfiTcgEventSize,
+ (VOID **)&EfiTcgEvent
+ );
+
+ EfiTcgEvent->Header.HeaderSize = sizeof(EFI_TCG2_EVENT_HEADER);
+ EfiTcgEvent->Header.EventType = EV_POST_CODE;
+ EfiTcgEvent->Header.PCRIndex = 16;
+ EfiTcgEvent->Size = EfiTcgEvent->Header.HeaderSize + SctStrSize(EventData);
+
+ // Perform HashLogExtendEvent over test buffer to PCR 16
+ Status = TCG2->HashLogExtendEvent (
+ TCG2,
+ Flags,
+ DataToHash,
+ DataToHashLen,
+ EfiTcgEvent);
+
+ if (Status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+ } else {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ }
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid010,
+ L"TCG2_PROTOCOL.HashLogExtendEvent - HashLogExtendEvent() Test: HashLogExtendEvent should return EFI_SUCCESS",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ // Test with valid Parameters but with Flags = PE_COFF_IMAGE
+ // EFI Protocol Spec Section 6.6.5 #4
+ Flags = PE_COFF_IMAGE;
+
+ Status = TCG2->HashLogExtendEvent (
+ TCG2,
+ Flags,
+ DataToHash,
+ DataToHashLen,
+ EfiTcgEvent);
+
+ if (Status != EFI_UNSUPPORTED) {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
+ } else {
+ AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
+ }
+
+ StandardLib->RecordAssertion (
+ StandardLib,
+ AssertionType,
+ gTcg2ConformanceTestAssertionGuid011,
+ L"TCG2_PROTOCOL.HashLogExtendEvent - HashLogExtendEvent() Test Handling of PE_COFF_IMAGE flag",
+ L"%a:%d: Status - %r",
+ __FILE__,
+ (UINTN)__LINE__,
+ Status
+ );
+
+ gtBS->FreePool (EfiTcgEvent);
+
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+}
diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestMain.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestMain.c
index 4e7b1593..892fce26 100644
--- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestMain.c
+++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/TCG2/BlackBoxTest/TCG2ProtocolBBTestMain.c
@@ -56,6 +56,15 @@ EFI_BB_TEST_ENTRY_FIELD gBBTestEntryField[] = {
EFI_TEST_CASE_AUTO,
BBTestGetActivePcrBanksConformanceTest
},
+ {
+ EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL_TEST_ENTRY_GUID0103,
+ L"HashLogExtendEvent_Conf",
+ L"Test the HashLogExtendEvent API",
+ EFI_TEST_LEVEL_DEFAULT,
+ gSupportProtocolGuid1,
+ EFI_TEST_CASE_AUTO,
+ BBTestHashLogExtendEventConformanceTest
+ },
0
};
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-09 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-09 20:58 [PATCH V2 0/6] Implementation of TCG2 Protocol test Joseph Hemann
2022-01-09 20:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] uefi-sct/SctPkg: TCG2 Protocol: add header with TCG2 protocol definitions Joseph Hemann
2022-01-09 20:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] uefi-sct/SctPkg: TCG2 Protocol: add GetCapability Test Joseph Hemann
2022-02-01 18:32 ` [edk2-devel] " Stuart Yoder
2022-02-07 17:59 ` Joseph Hemann
2022-01-09 20:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] uefi-sct/SctPkg: TCG2 Protocol: add GetActivePcrBanks test Joseph Hemann
2022-01-09 20:58 ` Joseph Hemann [this message]
2022-01-09 20:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] uefi-sct/SctPkg: TCG2 Protocol: add GetEventLog test Joseph Hemann
2022-01-09 20:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] uefi-sct/SctPkg: TCG2 Protocol: add SubmitCommand test Joseph Hemann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-20 13:43 [PATCH 0/6] Implementation of TCG2 Protocol test Joseph Hemann
2021-10-20 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] uefi-sct/SctPkg: TCG2 Protocol: add HashLogExtendEvent test Joseph Hemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220109205827.3608758-5-Joseph.hemann@arm.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox