From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.8253.1647332167264218906
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Tue, 15 Mar 2022 01:16:07 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=f/wd+a89;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.133.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1647332166;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=Rnt86/rTOtZ0k/G458oArodBCp+OJH51RoK/uVp2fmk=;
	b=f/wd+a89Mqfq3Afwd3utriM13ppTMKzsdLtx9aSv8YZaEy0gYKhi3de0IdgXIClSYz4D2k
	e4a8ahYYoWj317kdGtFL+Vf5QV9BCTMN9lRdaQPvsjlIM/ltZqdh51ET7Mw4QumyiKRzsD
	GDQkIn+YWuZ06S3Vezk8xslXkommaVE=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-624-MM91fQ9FN5OhE6AUKcbxRg-1; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 04:16:01 -0400
X-MC-Unique: MM91fQ9FN5OhE6AUKcbxRg-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B3F811E81;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:16:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.196.67])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77041402400;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:15:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9B60F18003A2; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:15:58 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:15:58 +0100
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	Zhiguang Liu <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 30/47] MdePkg: Add EFI_RESOURCE_MEMORY_UNACCEPTED defition
Message-ID: <20220315081558.yncbjqzxkasaopq2@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
References: <cover.1647047481.git.min.m.xu@intel.com>
 <a5648a353e0ecfd9aa151ec24046df4602c951fa.1647047482.git.min.m.xu@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a5648a353e0ecfd9aa151ec24046df4602c951fa.1647047482.git.min.m.xu@intel.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.7
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
	auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kraxel@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 09:53:55AM +0800, Min Xu wrote:
> RFC: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
> 
> Add EFI_RESOURCE_MEMORY_UNACCEPTED definition in PiHob.h. This definition
> is for the unaccepted memory passed from Host VMM.
> 
> This is proposed in https://github.com/microsoft/mu_basecore/pull/66/
> files#diff-b20a11152d1ce9249c691be5690b4baf52069efadf2e2546cdd2eb663d80c9e4R237
> according to UEFI-Code-First.
> 
> The proposal was approved in 2021 in UEFI Mantis, and will be added to the
> new PI.next specification.

Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>