From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.5382.1648553795141298876
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Tue, 29 Mar 2022 04:36:35 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=LdejlEgz;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.133.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1648553794;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=5YZ/9yhmuwfLvwlfTFqOylE1H0A9M1iza4cY+/NAQPI=;
	b=LdejlEgzvg+hK3fdIdjIOeF4L/RGO7AmxHms2lH2sp7ItOW+GMHjmHTWEw4id63B41LX9b
	Uem0FOEsUfL/yu4A+QY556wjM+lOaMo/ZA3/+IfICutyekbdczP2isYxwvPhtIHShvlxh6
	Or5WhEwZqUS1wmj/4Z6lxmSA8TNMws0=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-114-cY7GAbbbMg6Ev5Cqh5Gbew-1; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:36:28 -0400
X-MC-Unique: cY7GAbbbMg6Ev5Cqh5Gbew-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43109805F50;
	Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:36:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.194.10])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FB29C07F5B;
	Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A6FAE18003A3; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 13:36:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 13:36:10 +0200
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OvmfPkg/AmdSev: Reorder MEMFD pages to match the order in OvmfPkgX64.fdf
Message-ID: <20220329113610.cbbj3iigjimnsska@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
References: <20220328184530.86797-1-dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>
 <20220328184530.86797-2-dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20220328184530.86797-2-dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.8
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
	auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kraxel@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 06:45:29PM +0000, Dov Murik wrote:
> Reorder the pages in the MEMFD section of AmdSevX64.fdf so that it
> matches the same order used in OvmfPkgX64.fdf.

Makes sense.

Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

Maybe also move this to a common include file, so it is less likely that
they run out of sync again?

take care,
  Gerd