From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.10965.1654598891684698735 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 03:48:12 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=N864Jmp2; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.133.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1654598890; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=g3w6AVnT6KufbiAV76OCh1mgBC6Au/V/DBlg0USFlMg=; b=N864Jmp21uFUZXMXJAHw7XmBAQU/U/wB7KzYQdwQ51j1N8ULv+wnTm4tIN1SUsVzg6lBeE zkdKauBrIMZ0HmH6aHaRKOkyRxpsbLDLnZNeE8iCL4f+m+wh7XxTpu7mTOVLr/GUiMJzNB PlK+a6emV1ZHqwtZgLEvWggvCc9gRgQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-140-guZXNsctPhOv-UOCqnfWmQ-1; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 06:48:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: guZXNsctPhOv-UOCqnfWmQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F06C100BABE; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.192.40]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30BB6492C3B; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 516901800081; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:48:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:48:03 +0200 From: "Gerd Hoffmann" To: Min Xu Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Erdem Aktas , James Bottomley , Jiewen Yao , Tom Lendacky Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] OvmfPkg: Use PcdOvmfWorkAreaBase instead of PcdSevEsWorkAreaBase Message-ID: <20220607104803.gi2a6oihnsintuup@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: <63e9cfb295ce7a39cce3ae19c80f9bd48a9e4cf7.1654420876.git.min.m.xu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <63e9cfb295ce7a39cce3ae19c80f9bd48a9e4cf7.1654420876.git.min.m.xu@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.10 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kraxel@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:59:56AM +0800, Min Xu wrote: > From: Min M Xu > > RFC: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3937 > > It is an typo error that HobList pointer should be stored at > PcdOvmfWorkAreaBase, not PcdSevEsWorkAreaBase. How does that relate to lazy accept? To me this looks like an independent bugfix which should be submitted separately. take care, Gerd