From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, min.m.xu@intel.com
Cc: "thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@google.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg: Reserve the Ovmf work area as RT_DATA
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 09:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825074223.qrjhfb5fcixtgq3a@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB5064504351F3EC370731D1A3C5729@PH0PR11MB5064.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,
> > Runtime service call are restricted so that you don't have concurrent threads
> > executing (see section 8.1 of the specification). Without that you would have
> > problems with runtime services today.
> >
> One of the situation of CcProbe used is in BaseIoLib.
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Library/BaseIoLibIntrinsic/IoLibInternalTdx.c#L35-L40
>
> BaseIoLib is a basic library and it may be called by APs. While dynamic PCD access is not allowed in APs. Of course we can cache the PCD in a variable but I think it is still not safe.
>
> Reserving the OVMF work area as RT_DATA breaks the original intention of the design.
>
> Then how about this solution?
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91132
> We can design 2 instances of CcProbe. One is to read the OvmfWorkArea. The other is to call Cc guest specific way to determine the type.
When using RT_DATA is out of question there is no way around two
instances I think.
I don't see the point in reinventing the wheel though. We know what the
guest type is, why determine it *again*? We only need to copy the guest
type from the work area to another place before it is gone. I think
the dxe library instance could copy it to a variable in the init function.
take care,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-25 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-22 2:23 [PATCH 1/1] OvmfPkg: Reserve the Ovmf work area as RT_DATA Min Xu
2022-08-22 8:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-23 1:34 ` Min Xu
2022-08-23 7:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-23 8:40 ` Min Xu
2022-08-23 13:07 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2022-08-25 5:47 ` [edk2-devel] " Min Xu
2022-08-25 7:42 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2022-08-25 7:56 ` Min Xu
2022-08-25 8:15 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-08-22 13:18 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2022-08-23 1:38 ` Min Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220825074223.qrjhfb5fcixtgq3a@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox