From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.4424.1662528649725665217
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Tue, 06 Sep 2022 22:30:50 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ag5gHRpV;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.133.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1662528648;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=f//YDsyhmnb7z0C4/EArAjrlOxwSWUguY2zW8ftOp9s=;
	b=Ag5gHRpVMuUoShyTt3PVfVSt+EAxLAmQGsliXr6/FXvUA+l/VxCnWY4YGdcLJivNlAKgEL
	CUaQQNy4BTYJyawbfFgpdeff3DZev6Eu/UD1X9LscIvY2gRtWxEN5LkDwFXHUK66TMIalI
	v8nVbqfSQ8GFR5kBKlnYNeQdVDiPHw8=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-670-UVjXLZeWPIShbZQ90sguQg-1; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 01:30:47 -0400
X-MC-Unique: UVjXLZeWPIShbZQ90sguQg-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E461D101A54E;
	Wed,  7 Sep 2022 05:30:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.195.70])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FC01415137;
	Wed,  7 Sep 2022 05:30:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E689E180039B; Wed,  7 Sep 2022 07:30:44 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 07:30:44 +0200
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: "Xu, Min M" <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	"Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/14] MdeModulePkg: Add PrePiHob.h
Message-ID: <20220907053044.ssoeep67qvsrqbyl@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
References: <cover.1661579220.git.min.m.xu@intel.com>
 <46718f8e631711ce83f7db30cc6d6290a325f899.1661579220.git.min.m.xu@intel.com>
 <20220901154752.zk3kwzlkvm7mkrhx@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
 <PH0PR11MB5064C04E6BE880D0DC7875FFC57C9@PH0PR11MB5064.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB5064C04E6BE880D0DC7875FFC57C9@PH0PR11MB5064.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.85 on 10.11.54.7
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 11:34:14AM +0000, Xu, Min M wrote:
> On September 1, 2022 11:48 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >   Hi,
> > 
> > > EFI_RESOURCE_MEMORY_UNACCEPTED is defined for unaccepted memory.
> > > But this defitinion has not been officially in the PI spec.
> > 
> > I think this has just changed with uefi spec 2.10 released in August.
> > 
> I carefully checked the UEFI spec 2.10 but didn't find the unaccepted related changes in version 2.10. The latest one is in version 2.9. " 2134 Introduce unaccepted memory type "

Hmm, seems PI spec has its own memory types instead if just using the
UEFI spec ones so unaccepted memory being in UEFI doesn't help here as
long as we don't have a new PI spec yet.  Is there any ETA for the next
PI spec update?

take care,
  Gerd