From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Pawel Polawski <ppolawsk@redhat.com>,
Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: Add PlatformGetLowMemoryCB
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 15:03:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230112140340.wayqeuwh2d3gcp3s@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eba5f523-36c4-3685-8b0e-31469e9f8a34@redhat.com>
Hi,
> > I think it should actually simplify things. All the inconsistencies we
> > have (as you outlined above) due to the hole punching and edk2
> > supporting only a single range for 32bit mmio should go away, and we
> > will have less address space layout differences between q35 and pc.
>
> We've tried 0xE000_0000 in the past, in commit 75136b29541b.
>
> But had to revert it in commit eb4d62b0779c, due to 0xE000_0000 tickling
> a bug in QEMU.
>
> The bug tickling was actually reported by you :) See
> <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1859>.
Oh. I totally forgot about that. The patch from (I think) 2019 which
added _CRS for the range below the MMCONFIG should have fixed that, and
with recent qemu everything works fine.
I suspect we can't easily detect whenever qemu is broken or not. Hmm.
Is more than three years being passed enough to just do it
unconditionally and effectively raise the bar for the minimum
supported qemu version?
> (Well, if you mean to keep the same logic for both i440fx adn q35,
> that's OK then.)
Yes, it would be Uc32Base.
LowMemory and Uc32Base are identical anyway most of the time due to qemu
preferring gigabyte pages when possible, you need odd memory sizes like
1.5 or 2.5 GB to see they actually can be different.
take care,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 8:21 [PATCH v2 0/4] OvmfPkg: check 64bit mmio window for resource conflicts Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-10 8:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: Add PlatformScanE820 and GetFirstNonAddressCB Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-10 15:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-10 8:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: Add PlatformGetLowMemoryCB Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-10 16:53 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-11 7:29 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-11 13:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-11 15:23 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-12 11:09 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 14:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2023-01-12 15:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-10 8:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: Add PlatformAddHobCB Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-10 17:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-11 8:06 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-11 14:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-10 8:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: Add PlatformReservationConflictCB Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-10 17:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-11 8:26 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-12 10:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230112140340.wayqeuwh2d3gcp3s@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox