From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
devel@edk2.groups.io, Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>, Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>,
Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: catch QEMU's CPU hotplug reg block regression
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 08:25:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230118072525.cnk5ysqcnvdyeqow@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXG-UNkXwSoSo=nOo=-roMAan-k9o5abBsRhSS23kcH-cg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 05:43:53PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 at 13:37, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > >> In particular the firmware makes no further decisions based on
> > > >> whether QEMU advertized some of these features.
> > > >
> > > > I was thinking the other way around: When cpu hotplug is disabled in
> > > > qemu it should be safe to skip the whole cpu hotplug checking dance.
> > > > See test patch below.
> > > >
> > > > That would give us a config switch (turn off cpu hotplug support)
> > > > which would allow edk2 run on qemu versions with broken cpu hotplug.
> > > >
> > > > Does the idea look sane or do I miss something?
> >
> > > This would be wrong.
> > >
> > > [ detailed description snipped here (but stored for later reference,
> > > thanks for all the details) ]
> >
> > So, the tl;dr version: cpu hotplug is older than smi feature
> > negotiation, so smi hotplug feature bit being off doesn't imply
> > qemu wouldn't hotplug cpus.
> >
> > So, no easy way out. Luckily this affects tcg only.
> >
> > For edk2 ci doing (tcg) efi shell test boots switching to Oliver's
> > latest containers with fixed qemu included should handle things
> > (latest series just posted). So once this is in we should be able to
> > merge this patch without breaking CI.
>
> My head is spinning.
>
> What about running QEMU with only a single CPU, and without any of
> these features? Is there really no way we can make that work without
> turning OVMF into the timebomb that Laszlo describes?
I can't see any way :(
ovmf seeing only a single cpu does not imply cpu hotplug can't happen,
it could be "qemu -smp cpus=1,maxcpus=4". Figuring the maxcpus number
depends on the broken cpu hotplug registers.
> It's just very annoying that on a non-KVM host and a given QEMU
> binary, you might simply be out of luck entirely, and there is no way
> you can run OVMF with the fix applied. I would like to avoid that if
> possible.
Indeed.
take care,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 8:28 [PATCH v2] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: catch QEMU's CPU hotplug reg block regression Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 9:55 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael Brown
2023-01-12 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-12 13:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 13:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 16:08 ` Michael Brown
2023-01-12 17:58 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 18:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 22:49 ` Michael Brown
2023-01-13 6:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-13 9:32 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-13 10:10 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-13 12:22 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-16 14:42 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-16 14:48 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-17 12:37 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-17 16:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-18 7:25 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2023-01-18 11:50 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-18 13:10 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-18 13:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-18 13:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-18 13:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 18:34 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230118072525.cnk5ysqcnvdyeqow@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox