From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.11268.1674032811604002641
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Wed, 18 Jan 2023 01:06:51 -0800
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Oj1g6N0N;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 170.10.129.124, mailfrom: kraxel@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1674032810;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=S0+fVij61eLdFtUxfMd7dTk4uu/wSPHOFin1R1clwsA=;
	b=Oj1g6N0Nlhyiyr/UWlZIxahoS9SStnM6xxScVU2MWL3EVlzWD/sYCp9yaGK+aNuDDj9maT
	PJe0VrkS+R5M/7K3auslUeXULziVM//6FkbcdNEB6aDhNzMLnzGQEu7Ge2OUb3STiPp8Z5
	AcXwU12KxSwT8jkWvtlOU4TUgwo4DJA=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-271-Pj3tYBNtNX6fkMl2DaZbcQ-1; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 04:06:49 -0500
X-MC-Unique: Pj3tYBNtNX6fkMl2DaZbcQ-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 918E73815EEA;
	Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:06:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sirius.home.kraxel.org (unknown [10.39.192.186])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BEF153A0;
	Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:06:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by sirius.home.kraxel.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 492A71800091; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:06:46 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:06:46 +0100
From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>,
	Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/1] MdeModulePkg: EfiUnacceptedMemoryType is not allowed in AllocatePool
Message-ID: <20230118090646.dqnjionwedq3nb26@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
References: <20230118084158.1412-1-min.m.xu@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20230118084158.1412-1-min.m.xu@intel.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.5
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 04:41:58PM +0800, Min Xu wrote:
> From: Min M Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
> 
> BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4315
> 
> MemoryType of EfiUnacceptedMemoryType should not be allocated in
> AllocatePool. Instead it should return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER.

Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>