From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Kumar, Rahul R" <rahul.r.kumar@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Zimmer, Vincent" <vincent.zimmer@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] UefiCpuPkg/SmmBaseHob.h: Add SMM Base HOB Data
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:13:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230119071324.4xvry2vvvfdr5m5y@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MN6PR11MB82446A36A4BFBB2E1C41893F8CC79@MN6PR11MB8244.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 03:06:11PM +0000, Ni, Ray wrote:
> Gerd,
> In another mail with title "MdePkg: Remove Itanium leftover data structure",
> we are discussing the HOB EFI_SEC_PLATFORM_INFORMATION_RECORD2 that helps
> share the BIST information with CpuDxe driver.
> That HOB is of format: <UINT32> ( <UINT32> <UINT32> ) +.
> Very similar to the format of SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA: <UINT64> <UINT64>+
Same problem indeed.
> So, if we use a pattern here to remove the 8K CPU limitation, the same pattern will
> be used by EFI_SEC_PLATFORM_INFORMATION_RECORD2 as well.
>
> How about a new format as below? + Mike and Vincent for comments since the same
> pattern may be used for EFI_SEC_PLATFORM_INFORMATION_RECORD3.
>
> #pragma pack(1)
> typedef struct {
> UINT32 CpuIndex;
> UINT32 NumberOfCpus; // align to EFI_SEC_PLATFORM_INFORMATION_RECORD2.NumberOfCpus
> UINT64 SmBase[];
> } SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA;
> #pragma pack()
>
> For system with less than 8K CPUs, one HOB is produced. CpuIndex is set to 0 indicating
> the HOB describes the CPU from 0 to NumberOfCpus-1.
>
> The HOB list may contains multiple such HOB instances each describing the information for
> CPU from CpuIndex to CpuIndex + NumberOfCpus - 1.
> The instance order in the HOB list is random so consumer cannot assume the CpuIndex
> of first instance is 0.
The idea looks good to me.
For the smbase case it might also be possible to store the base
address and the per-cpu entry size, then use
smbase = base + size * cpuindex
to calculate the per-cpu base address. Puts some restrictions on the
memory allocation (must be one big block), not sure this is possible,
that part of the code is not (yet?) posted for review.
take care,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-19 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-18 9:56 [PATCH v3 0/5] Simplify SMM Relocation Process Wu, Jiaxin
2023-01-18 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] UefiCpuPkg/SmmBaseHob.h: Add SMM Base HOB Data Wu, Jiaxin
2023-01-18 11:19 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-18 15:06 ` Ni, Ray
2023-01-19 7:13 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2023-01-29 5:08 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-01 13:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-20 8:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-29 5:24 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-01 13:14 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-02 0:44 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-02 3:54 ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2023-02-02 3:52 ` Ni, Ray
2023-02-02 12:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-02 22:29 ` [edk2-devel] " Brian J. Johnson
2023-02-03 3:14 ` Ni, Ray
2023-02-03 7:54 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-03 13:22 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-03 13:31 ` Ni, Ray
2023-02-03 15:00 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-18 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Fix invalid InitializeMpSyncData call Wu, Jiaxin
2023-01-18 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Consume SMM Base Hob for SmBase info Wu, Jiaxin
2023-01-18 12:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-29 6:14 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Jiaxin
2023-01-18 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] UefiCpuPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: Skip SMBASE configuration Wu, Jiaxin
2023-01-18 9:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] OvmfPkg/SmmCpuFeaturesLib: " Wu, Jiaxin
2023-01-18 12:19 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-18 14:37 ` Ni, Ray
2023-01-19 7:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-29 5:47 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-01 13:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-02 1:41 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-02 9:00 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-02 11:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-02-02 12:24 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-03 3:05 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-03 2:47 ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-03 3:45 ` Ni, Ray
2023-02-03 7:31 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-03 7:43 ` Ni, Ray
2023-02-03 8:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-03 11:18 ` Wu, Jiaxin
[not found] ` <173B5EAF72B992BD.14781@groups.io>
2023-02-03 8:59 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Jiaxin
2023-02-03 9:04 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-02-03 11:15 ` Wu, Jiaxin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230119071324.4xvry2vvvfdr5m5y@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox