From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
dave.hansen@intel.com, dionnaglaze@google.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Shutemov, Kirill" <kirill.shutemov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v9 0/4] Add safe unaccepted memory behavior
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 13:10:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230125121001.jnmlfkqheeqzygcw@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGbSXs9bUCjSoc+Z-dWoSOd2YQPz3T83MhaVh1a8smjmw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:44:13PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 10:18, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:01:47AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > > Exactly. And my Fedora kernel has those bits enabled by default.
> > >
> > > So I suppose the way forward here is to expose this protocol only on
> > > OVMF builds that target SEV-SNP, instead of introducing it as a
> > > generic CoCo feature.
> >
> > OVMF builds already adapt at runtime, so this needs to be a runtime
> > check too. But IIRC the module already checks whenever SNP-SEV or TDX
> > is active before installing, so we only need to tweak that check to drop
> > the TDX check.
> >
>
> Sure. But Dionna's series introduces a new CocoDxe driver that is
> intended to carry shared logic, but we should probably add this stuff
> to AmdSevDxe instead.
OvmfPkgX64.dsc can run in SEV/TDX modes too, so it is needed there as
well. We can probably leave it out from IntelTdx (assuming Intel's
upstream merge plans work out as expected and tdx-guest + unaccepted
memory actually land in the same kernel release).
take care,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-25 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-13 0:14 [PATCH v9 0/4] Add safe unaccepted memory behavior Dionna Glaze
2023-01-13 0:14 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] OvmfPkg: Introduce CocoDxe driver Dionna Glaze
2023-01-13 0:14 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] MdePkg: Introduce the MemoryAcceptance protocol Dionna Glaze
2023-01-13 0:14 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] OvmfPkg: Implement AcceptAllUnacceptedMemory in CocoDxe Dionna Glaze
2023-01-13 0:14 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: SEV-SNP make >=4GB unaccepted Dionna Glaze
2023-01-13 3:46 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] Add safe unaccepted memory behavior Yao, Jiewen
2023-01-13 7:18 ` [edk2-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-13 7:32 ` Yao, Jiewen
2023-01-13 9:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 11:11 ` Yao, Jiewen
2023-01-13 11:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 11:44 ` Yao, Jiewen
2023-01-13 12:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 16:00 ` dave.hansen
2023-01-13 17:06 ` Dionna Glaze
2023-01-13 17:57 ` Dave Hansen
2023-01-13 18:23 ` Dionna Glaze
2023-01-13 18:34 ` Dave Hansen
2023-01-16 10:28 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-24 22:42 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2023-01-24 22:46 ` Dave Hansen
2023-01-25 9:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-25 9:18 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-25 11:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-25 12:10 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2023-01-25 14:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-25 16:56 ` Yao, Jiewen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230125121001.jnmlfkqheeqzygcw@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox