From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>,
Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>,
Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: arm64 support for stuart
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:55:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230125165556.tvp7cgjsj2kie7b6@sirius.home.kraxel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXGrha7Vy7Q7EEPqsox7YxuVug2g_wvhOmAVx1wNkQvMYg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
> Given that nasm is x86 specific, we should be able to work around this
> by moving the nasm_ext_dep.yaml file into the right place.
Overall stuart feels kind of alien to linux. It just goes download
stuff from the internet, even in case the tools are already available
locally. Oliver fixed some (but not all) of these when moving CI over
to using containers. IIRC at least the cross compilers are just the
standard fedora cross compiler packages now.
While being at it: edk2-pytool-library fails to build with network
access turned off[1] because it tries to download vswhere.exe from the
internet. Even when building on linux.
> Then, if/when mu_nasm for arm64 becomes available, we will also be
> able to build OVMF from arm64 (although I am probably the only person
> in the world who does that regularly.)
Fedora build system does that too. We have a patch to make x86 cross
builds work like arm cross builds, by just setting GCC5_${ARCH}_PREFIX
environment variable:
https://github.com/kraxel/edk2/commit/6b2ca6f01bb76a3b9632e902b4bf0ef9e912ce40
Guess I should submit that one for upstream inclusion ;)
> iasl is a different matter, as we need it to build for arm64 as well.
> iasl is already available in the arm64 distros, so as I see it, there
> are 3 options here:
> - build iasl for Linux/arm64 and add it to the nuget repo
> - allow a fallback to system-wide iasl (how?)
Just use the system-wide tools is the best option IMHO. The packages
are available in Fedora (other distros should be have them too), on both
x86_64 and aarch64, we only need to add them to the CI container image.
So why bother adding nuget builds?
That is also less fragile than downloading them on each CI run and have
checks fail now and then due to network problems.
Is it possible to run github actions (used to build containers) and
azure pipelines on aarch64 systems? So we could move ArmVirt CI from
x86 cross builds to native arm builds?
take care,
Gerd
[1] Offline builds are standard for linux distro builds to make sure
all sources needed are to produce the binary package are actually
included in the source package.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-25 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-25 14:32 arm64 support for stuart Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-25 16:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2023-01-25 17:52 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael Brown
2023-01-25 18:04 ` Oliver Steffen
2023-01-25 18:27 ` Oliver Steffen
2023-01-25 19:00 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael D Kinney
2023-01-25 20:21 ` Oliver Steffen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230125165556.tvp7cgjsj2kie7b6@sirius.home.kraxel.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox