public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue
@ 2023-05-18  6:28 Ranbir Singh
  2023-05-18 19:55 ` Chiu, Chasel
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ranbir Singh @ 2023-05-18  6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: devel; +Cc: Chasel Chiu, Nate DeSimone, Star Zeng, Ranbir Singh

FspData->PerfIdx is getting increased for every call unconditionally
in the function SetFspMeasurePoint and hence memory access can happen
for out of bound FspData->PerfData[] array entries also.

Example -
   FspData->PerfData is an array of 32 UINT64 entries. Assume a call
   is made to SetFspMeasurePoint function when the FspData->PerfIdx
   last value is 31. It gets incremented to 32 at line 400.
   Any subsequent call to SetFspMeasurePoint functions leads to
   FspData->PerfData[32] getting accessed which is out of the PerfData
   array as well as the FSP_GLOBAL_DATA structure boundary.

Hence keep array access and index increment inside if block only and
return invalid performance timestamp when PerfIdx is invalid.

Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200
Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
---
 IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
index a22b0e7825ad..cda2a7b2478e 100644
--- a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
+++ b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
@@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ GetFspSiliconInitUpdDataPointer (
 
   @param[in] Id       Measurement point ID.
 
-  @return performance timestamp.
+  @return performance timestamp if current PerfIdx is valid,
+          else return 0 as invalid performance timestamp
 **/
 UINT64
 EFIAPI
@@ -395,9 +396,10 @@ SetFspMeasurePoint (
   if (FspData->PerfIdx < sizeof (FspData->PerfData) / sizeof (FspData->PerfData[0])) {
     FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]                  = AsmReadTsc ();
     ((UINT8 *)(&FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]))[7] = Id;
+    return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];
   }
 
-  return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];
+  return (UINT64)0x0000000000000000;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue
  2023-05-18  6:28 [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
@ 2023-05-18 19:55 ` Chiu, Chasel
  2023-05-19 12:29 ` [edk2-devel] " Pedro Falcato
  2023-05-30  5:22 ` Chiu, Chasel
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chiu, Chasel @ 2023-05-18 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ranbir Singh, devel@edk2.groups.io
  Cc: Desimone, Nathaniel L, Zeng, Star, Ranbir Singh


This fix looks good to me! Thanks Ranbir!
Reviewed-by: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 11:29 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Ranbir
> Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN
> Coverity issue
> 
> FspData->PerfIdx is getting increased for every call unconditionally
> in the function SetFspMeasurePoint and hence memory access can happen for
> out of bound FspData->PerfData[] array entries also.
> 
> Example -
>    FspData->PerfData is an array of 32 UINT64 entries. Assume a call
>    is made to SetFspMeasurePoint function when the FspData->PerfIdx
>    last value is 31. It gets incremented to 32 at line 400.
>    Any subsequent call to SetFspMeasurePoint functions leads to
>    FspData->PerfData[32] getting accessed which is out of the PerfData
>    array as well as the FSP_GLOBAL_DATA structure boundary.
> 
> Hence keep array access and index increment inside if block only and return
> invalid performance timestamp when PerfIdx is invalid.
> 
> Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
> Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200
> Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> index a22b0e7825ad..cda2a7b2478e 100644
> --- a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> +++ b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ GetFspSiliconInitUpdDataPointer (
>     @param[in] Id       Measurement point ID. -  @return performance
> timestamp.+  @return performance timestamp if current PerfIdx is valid,+
> else return 0 as invalid performance timestamp **/ UINT64 EFIAPI@@ -395,9
> +396,10 @@ SetFspMeasurePoint (
>    if (FspData->PerfIdx < sizeof (FspData->PerfData) / sizeof (FspData-
> >PerfData[0])) {     FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]                  =
> AsmReadTsc ();     ((UINT8 *)(&FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]))[7] = Id;+
> return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];   } -  return FspData-
> >PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];+  return (UINT64)0x0000000000000000; }
> /**--
> 2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue
  2023-05-18  6:28 [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
  2023-05-18 19:55 ` Chiu, Chasel
@ 2023-05-19 12:29 ` Pedro Falcato
  2023-05-30  3:28   ` Chiu, Chasel
  2023-05-30  5:22 ` Chiu, Chasel
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Falcato @ 2023-05-19 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: devel, rsingh; +Cc: Chasel Chiu, Nate DeSimone, Star Zeng, Ranbir Singh

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:16 PM Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> FspData->PerfIdx is getting increased for every call unconditionally
> in the function SetFspMeasurePoint and hence memory access can happen
> for out of bound FspData->PerfData[] array entries also.
>
> Example -
>    FspData->PerfData is an array of 32 UINT64 entries. Assume a call
>    is made to SetFspMeasurePoint function when the FspData->PerfIdx
>    last value is 31. It gets incremented to 32 at line 400.
>    Any subsequent call to SetFspMeasurePoint functions leads to
>    FspData->PerfData[32] getting accessed which is out of the PerfData
>    array as well as the FSP_GLOBAL_DATA structure boundary.
>
> Hence keep array access and index increment inside if block only and
> return invalid performance timestamp when PerfIdx is invalid.
>
> Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
> Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200
> Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> index a22b0e7825ad..cda2a7b2478e 100644
> --- a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> +++ b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ GetFspSiliconInitUpdDataPointer (
>
>    @param[in] Id       Measurement point ID.
>
> -  @return performance timestamp.
> +  @return performance timestamp if current PerfIdx is valid,
> +          else return 0 as invalid performance timestamp
>  **/
>  UINT64
>  EFIAPI
> @@ -395,9 +396,10 @@ SetFspMeasurePoint (
>    if (FspData->PerfIdx < sizeof (FspData->PerfData) / sizeof (FspData->PerfData[0])) {
>      FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]                  = AsmReadTsc ();
>      ((UINT8 *)(&FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]))[7] = Id;
> +    return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];
>    }
>
> -  return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];
> +  return (UINT64)0x0000000000000000;

return 0;

Works just as well. You also don't need a cast.

https://godbolt.org/z/e5vvGcWWo

-- 
Pedro

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue
  2023-05-19 12:29 ` [edk2-devel] " Pedro Falcato
@ 2023-05-30  3:28   ` Chiu, Chasel
  2023-05-30  3:35     ` Ranbir Singh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chiu, Chasel @ 2023-05-30  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: devel@edk2.groups.io, pedro.falcato@gmail.com,
	rsingh@ventanamicro.com
  Cc: Desimone, Nathaniel L, Zeng, Star, Ranbir Singh


That’s good suggestion Pedro!
Ranbir, would you like me to modify your patch to "return 0" during merging?

Thanks,
Chasel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Pedro
> Falcato
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 5:29 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rsingh@ventanamicro.com
> Cc: Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Ranbir
> Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@dell.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib:
> Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue
> 
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:16 PM Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > FspData->PerfIdx is getting increased for every call unconditionally
> > in the function SetFspMeasurePoint and hence memory access can happen
> > for out of bound FspData->PerfData[] array entries also.
> >
> > Example -
> >    FspData->PerfData is an array of 32 UINT64 entries. Assume a call
> >    is made to SetFspMeasurePoint function when the FspData->PerfIdx
> >    last value is 31. It gets incremented to 32 at line 400.
> >    Any subsequent call to SetFspMeasurePoint functions leads to
> >    FspData->PerfData[32] getting accessed which is out of the PerfData
> >    array as well as the FSP_GLOBAL_DATA structure boundary.
> >
> > Hence keep array access and index increment inside if block only and
> > return invalid performance timestamp when PerfIdx is invalid.
> >
> > Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
> > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200
> > Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> > ---
> >  IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> > b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> > index a22b0e7825ad..cda2a7b2478e 100644
> > --- a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> > +++ b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> > @@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ GetFspSiliconInitUpdDataPointer (
> >
> >    @param[in] Id       Measurement point ID.
> >
> > -  @return performance timestamp.
> > +  @return performance timestamp if current PerfIdx is valid,
> > +          else return 0 as invalid performance timestamp
> >  **/
> >  UINT64
> >  EFIAPI
> > @@ -395,9 +396,10 @@ SetFspMeasurePoint (
> >    if (FspData->PerfIdx < sizeof (FspData->PerfData) / sizeof (FspData-
> >PerfData[0])) {
> >      FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]                  = AsmReadTsc ();
> >      ((UINT8 *)(&FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]))[7] = Id;
> > +    return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];
> >    }
> >
> > -  return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];
> > +  return (UINT64)0x0000000000000000;
> 
> return 0;
> 
> Works just as well. You also don't need a cast.
> 
> https://godbolt.org/z/e5vvGcWWo
> 
> --
> Pedro
> 
> 
> 
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue
  2023-05-30  3:28   ` Chiu, Chasel
@ 2023-05-30  3:35     ` Ranbir Singh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ranbir Singh @ 2023-05-30  3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chiu, Chasel
  Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, pedro.falcato@gmail.com,
	Desimone, Nathaniel L, Zeng, Star, Ranbir Singh

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3535 bytes --]

Yes Chasel - please do so while merging, thanks!

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 8:58 AM Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com> wrote:

>
> That’s good suggestion Pedro!
> Ranbir, would you like me to modify your patch to "return 0" during
> merging?
>
> Thanks,
> Chasel
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Pedro
> > Falcato
> > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 5:29 AM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; rsingh@ventanamicro.com
> > Cc: Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> > <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>;
> Ranbir
> > Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@dell.com>
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/1]
> IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib:
> > Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue
> >
> > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:16 PM Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > FspData->PerfIdx is getting increased for every call unconditionally
> > > in the function SetFspMeasurePoint and hence memory access can happen
> > > for out of bound FspData->PerfData[] array entries also.
> > >
> > > Example -
> > >    FspData->PerfData is an array of 32 UINT64 entries. Assume a call
> > >    is made to SetFspMeasurePoint function when the FspData->PerfIdx
> > >    last value is 31. It gets incremented to 32 at line 400.
> > >    Any subsequent call to SetFspMeasurePoint functions leads to
> > >    FspData->PerfData[32] getting accessed which is out of the PerfData
> > >    array as well as the FSP_GLOBAL_DATA structure boundary.
> > >
> > > Hence keep array access and index increment inside if block only and
> > > return invalid performance timestamp when PerfIdx is invalid.
> > >
> > > Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200
> > > Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> > > ---
> > >  IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c | 6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> > > b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> > > index a22b0e7825ad..cda2a7b2478e 100644
> > > --- a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> > > +++ b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> > > @@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ GetFspSiliconInitUpdDataPointer (
> > >
> > >    @param[in] Id       Measurement point ID.
> > >
> > > -  @return performance timestamp.
> > > +  @return performance timestamp if current PerfIdx is valid,
> > > +          else return 0 as invalid performance timestamp
> > >  **/
> > >  UINT64
> > >  EFIAPI
> > > @@ -395,9 +396,10 @@ SetFspMeasurePoint (
> > >    if (FspData->PerfIdx < sizeof (FspData->PerfData) / sizeof (FspData-
> > >PerfData[0])) {
> > >      FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]                  = AsmReadTsc
> ();
> > >      ((UINT8 *)(&FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]))[7] = Id;
> > > +    return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];
> > >    }
> > >
> > > -  return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];
> > > +  return (UINT64)0x0000000000000000;
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > Works just as well. You also don't need a cast.
> >
> > https://godbolt.org/z/e5vvGcWWo
> >
> > --
> > Pedro
> >
> >
> > 
> >
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5520 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue
  2023-05-18  6:28 [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
  2023-05-18 19:55 ` Chiu, Chasel
  2023-05-19 12:29 ` [edk2-devel] " Pedro Falcato
@ 2023-05-30  5:22 ` Chiu, Chasel
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chiu, Chasel @ 2023-05-30  5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ranbir Singh, devel@edk2.groups.io
  Cc: Desimone, Nathaniel L, Zeng, Star, Ranbir Singh, Pedro Falcato


Patch merged:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/48c53994e649d51a388dc414944c9a9b717a1c3c

Thanks,
Chasel



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 11:29 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chiu, Chasel <chasel.chiu@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L
> <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Ranbir
> Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN
> Coverity issue
> 
> FspData->PerfIdx is getting increased for every call unconditionally
> in the function SetFspMeasurePoint and hence memory access can happen for
> out of bound FspData->PerfData[] array entries also.
> 
> Example -
>    FspData->PerfData is an array of 32 UINT64 entries. Assume a call
>    is made to SetFspMeasurePoint function when the FspData->PerfIdx
>    last value is 31. It gets incremented to 32 at line 400.
>    Any subsequent call to SetFspMeasurePoint functions leads to
>    FspData->PerfData[32] getting accessed which is out of the PerfData
>    array as well as the FSP_GLOBAL_DATA structure boundary.
> 
> Hence keep array access and index increment inside if block only and return
> invalid performance timestamp when PerfIdx is invalid.
> 
> Cc: Chasel Chiu <chasel.chiu@intel.com>
> Cc: Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4200
> Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> index a22b0e7825ad..cda2a7b2478e 100644
> --- a/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> +++ b/IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib/FspCommonLib.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ GetFspSiliconInitUpdDataPointer (
>     @param[in] Id       Measurement point ID. -  @return performance
> timestamp.+  @return performance timestamp if current PerfIdx is valid,+
> else return 0 as invalid performance timestamp **/ UINT64 EFIAPI@@ -395,9
> +396,10 @@ SetFspMeasurePoint (
>    if (FspData->PerfIdx < sizeof (FspData->PerfData) / sizeof (FspData-
> >PerfData[0])) {     FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]                  =
> AsmReadTsc ();     ((UINT8 *)(&FspData->PerfData[FspData->PerfIdx]))[7] = Id;+
> return FspData->PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];   } -  return FspData-
> >PerfData[(FspData->PerfIdx)++];+  return (UINT64)0x0000000000000000; }
> /**--
> 2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-30  5:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-18  6:28 [PATCH 1/1] IntelFsp2Pkg/Library/BaseFspCommonLib: Fix OVERRUN Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
2023-05-18 19:55 ` Chiu, Chasel
2023-05-19 12:29 ` [edk2-devel] " Pedro Falcato
2023-05-30  3:28   ` Chiu, Chasel
2023-05-30  3:35     ` Ranbir Singh
2023-05-30  5:22 ` Chiu, Chasel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox