public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ranbir Singh" <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, rsingh@ventanamicro.com
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	Veeresh Sangolli <veeresh.sangolli@dellteam.com>
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 3/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix ARRAY_VS_SINGLETON Coverity issues
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:46:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230927061701.451202-4-rsingh@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230927061701.451202-1-rsingh@ventanamicro.com>

From: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>

The function PciHostBridgeResourceAllocator is not making use of the
generic approach as is used in one of the other function namely -
DumpResourceMap. As a result, the following warnings can be seen as
reported by Coverity e.g.

(30) Event address_of:	Taking address with "&IoBridge" yields a
     singleton pointer.
(31) Event callee_ptr_arith:	Passing "&IoBridge" to function
     "FindResourceNode" which uses it as an array. This might corrupt
     or misinterpret adjacent memory locations.

Hence, adopt the generic approach to fix the issues at relevant points.

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4239

Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Veeresh Sangolli <veeresh.sangolli@dellteam.com>
Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <Ranbir.Singh3@Dell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ranbir Singh <rsingh@ventanamicro.com>
---
 MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c
index 84fc0161a19c..71767d3793d4 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciLib.c
@@ -485,6 +485,8 @@ PciHostBridgeResourceAllocator (
   UINT64                                         Mem64ResStatus;
   UINT64                                         PMem64ResStatus;
   UINT32                                         MaxOptionRomSize;
+  PCI_RESOURCE_NODE                              **ChildResources;
+  UINTN                                          ChildResourceCount;
   PCI_RESOURCE_NODE                              *IoBridge;
   PCI_RESOURCE_NODE                              *Mem32Bridge;
   PCI_RESOURCE_NODE                              *PMem32Bridge;
@@ -895,16 +897,39 @@ PciHostBridgeResourceAllocator (
     // Create the entire system resource map from the information collected by
     // enumerator. Several resource tree was created
     //
-    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &IoPool, &IoBridge);
-    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &Mem32Pool, &Mem32Bridge);
-    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &PMem32Pool, &PMem32Bridge);
-    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &Mem64Pool, &Mem64Bridge);
-    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &PMem64Pool, &PMem64Bridge);
-
+    ChildResourceCount = FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &IoPool, NULL);
+    ChildResources = AllocatePool (sizeof (PCI_RESOURCE_NODE *) * ChildResourceCount);
+    ASSERT (ChildResources != NULL);
+    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &IoPool, &ChildResources[0]);
+    IoBridge = ChildResources[0];
     ASSERT (IoBridge     != NULL);
+
+    ChildResourceCount = FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &Mem32Pool, NULL);
+    ChildResources = AllocatePool (sizeof (PCI_RESOURCE_NODE *) * ChildResourceCount);
+    ASSERT (ChildResources != NULL);
+    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &Mem32Pool, &ChildResources[0]);
+    Mem32Bridge = ChildResources[0];
     ASSERT (Mem32Bridge  != NULL);
+
+    ChildResourceCount = FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &PMem32Pool, NULL);
+    ChildResources = AllocatePool (sizeof (PCI_RESOURCE_NODE *) * ChildResourceCount);
+    ASSERT (ChildResources != NULL);
+    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &PMem32Pool, &ChildResources[0]);
+    PMem32Bridge = ChildResources[0];
     ASSERT (PMem32Bridge != NULL);
+
+    ChildResourceCount = FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &Mem64Pool, NULL);
+    ChildResources = AllocatePool (sizeof (PCI_RESOURCE_NODE *) * ChildResourceCount);
+    ASSERT (ChildResources != NULL);
+    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &Mem64Pool, &ChildResources[0]);
+    Mem64Bridge = ChildResources[0];
     ASSERT (Mem64Bridge  != NULL);
+
+    ChildResourceCount = FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &PMem64Pool, NULL);
+    ChildResources = AllocatePool (sizeof (PCI_RESOURCE_NODE *) * ChildResourceCount);
+    ASSERT (ChildResources != NULL);
+    FindResourceNode (RootBridgeDev, &PMem64Pool, &ChildResources[0]);
+    PMem64Bridge = ChildResources[0];
     ASSERT (PMem64Bridge != NULL);
 
     //
-- 
2.34.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#109110): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/109110
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/101612809/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-27  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-27  6:16 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 0/5] BZ 4239: Fix PciBusDxe issues pointed by Ranbir Singh
2023-09-27  6:16 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix DEADCODE Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
2023-09-27  6:16 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 2/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix MISSING_BREAK Coverity issues Ranbir Singh
2023-09-27  6:16 ` Ranbir Singh [this message]
2023-09-27  6:17 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 4/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix NULL_RETURNS Coverity issue Ranbir Singh
2023-09-27  6:17 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 5/5] MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe: Fix UNUSED_VALUE Coverity issues Ranbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230927061701.451202-4-rsingh@ventanamicro.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox