public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>,
	Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>, Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/BaseXApicLib: Fix CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY detection
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 19:15:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231115111553.6592-2-jiaxin.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231115111553.6592-1-jiaxin.wu@intel.com>

This patch is to complete 170d4ce8, sync the change to BaseXApicLib.

Checking the max cpuid leaf is not enough to figure whenever
CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY is supported.  Intel SDM says:

Software must detect the presence of CPUID leaf 1FH by verifying
(a) the highest leaf index supported by CPUID is >= 1FH, and
(b) CPUID.1FH:EBX[15:0] reports a non-zero value.

The same is true for CPUID leaf 0BH.

This patch adds the EBX check to GetProcessorLocation2ByApicId().  The
patch also fixes the existing check in GetProcessorLocationByApicId() to
be in line with the spec by looking at bits 15:0.  The comments are
updated with a quote from the Intel SDM.

Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
---
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicLib/BaseXApicLib.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicLib/BaseXApicLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicLib/BaseXApicLib.c
index d56c6275cc..efb9d71ca1 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicLib/BaseXApicLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicLib/BaseXApicLib.c
@@ -1053,15 +1053,16 @@ GetProcessorLocationByApicId (
       &ExtendedTopologyEbx.Uint32,
       &ExtendedTopologyEcx.Uint32,
       NULL
       );
     //
-    // If CPUID.(EAX=0BH, ECX=0H):EBX returns zero and maximum input value for
-    // basic CPUID information is greater than 0BH, then CPUID.0BH leaf is not
-    // supported on that processor.
+    // Quoting Intel SDM:
+    // Software must detect the presence of CPUID leaf 0BH by
+    // verifying (a) the highest leaf index supported by CPUID is >=
+    // 0BH, and (b) CPUID.0BH:EBX[15:0] reports a non-zero value.
     //
-    if (ExtendedTopologyEbx.Uint32 != 0) {
+    if (ExtendedTopologyEbx.Bits.LogicalProcessors != 0) {
       TopologyLeafSupported = TRUE;
 
       //
       // Sub-leaf index 0 (ECX= 0 as input) provides enumeration parameters to extract
       // the SMT sub-field of x2APIC ID.
@@ -1183,10 +1184,11 @@ GetProcessorLocation2ByApicId (
   OUT UINT32  *Core     OPTIONAL,
   OUT UINT32  *Thread   OPTIONAL
   )
 {
   CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_EAX  ExtendedTopologyEax;
+  CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_EBX  ExtendedTopologyEbx;
   CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ECX  ExtendedTopologyEcx;
   UINT32                       MaxStandardCpuIdIndex;
   UINT32                       Index;
   UINTN                        LevelType;
   UINT32                       Bits[CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_TYPE_DIE + 2];
@@ -1195,14 +1197,23 @@ GetProcessorLocation2ByApicId (
   for (LevelType = 0; LevelType < ARRAY_SIZE (Bits); LevelType++) {
     Bits[LevelType] = 0;
   }
 
   //
-  // Get max index of CPUID
+  // Quoting Intel SDM:
+  // Software must detect the presence of CPUID leaf 1FH by verifying
+  // (a) the highest leaf index supported by CPUID is >= 1FH, and (b)
+  // CPUID.1FH:EBX[15:0] reports a non-zero value.
   //
   AsmCpuid (CPUID_SIGNATURE, &MaxStandardCpuIdIndex, NULL, NULL, NULL);
   if (MaxStandardCpuIdIndex < CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY) {
+    ExtendedTopologyEbx.Bits.LogicalProcessors = 0;
+  } else {
+    AsmCpuidEx (CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY, 0, NULL, &ExtendedTopologyEbx.Uint32, NULL, NULL);
+  }
+
+  if (ExtendedTopologyEbx.Bits.LogicalProcessors == 0) {
     if (Die != NULL) {
       *Die = 0;
     }
 
     if (Tile != NULL) {
-- 
2.16.2.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#111257): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/111257
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102602851/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-15 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-15 11:15 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Get and use Get processor extended information Wu, Jiaxin
2023-11-15 11:15 ` Wu, Jiaxin [this message]
2023-11-15 14:44   ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/BaseXApicLib: Fix CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY detection Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-16  1:25   ` Ni, Ray
2023-11-21  2:23   ` Ni, Ray
2023-11-15 11:15 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Get processor extended information Wu, Jiaxin
2023-11-21  2:24   ` Ni, Ray
2023-11-15 11:15 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Use " Wu, Jiaxin
2023-11-16  1:30   ` Ni, Ray
2023-11-17 21:05     ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-11-20  1:44       ` Ni, Ray
2023-11-20 12:42         ` Wu, Jiaxin
2023-11-21 16:12           ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-12-08 13:28           ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231115111553.6592-2-jiaxin.wu@intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox