From: "duntan" <dun.tan@intel.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: [edk2-devel] [Patch V3 6/6] UefiCpuPkg: Avoid assuming only one smmbasehob
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 17:54:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231208095443.1328-4-dun.tan@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231208095443.1328-1-dun.tan@intel.com>
Modify the gSmmBaseHobGuid consumption code to
remove the asuumption that there is only one
gSmmBaseHobGuid. If the CPU number is big enough,
there will be more than one SmmBaseHob in the
HOB list.
Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun.tan@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 149 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.c
index 53f67d544d..209a2e4810 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.c
@@ -586,6 +586,132 @@ SmmReadyToLockEventNotify (
return EFI_SUCCESS;
}
+/**
+ Function to compare 2 SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA pointer based on ProcessorIndex.
+
+ @param[in] Buffer1 pointer to SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA poiner to compare
+ @param[in] Buffer2 pointer to second SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA pointer to compare
+
+ @retval 0 Buffer1 equal to Buffer2
+ @retval <0 Buffer1 is less than Buffer2
+ @retval >0 Buffer1 is greater than Buffer2
+**/
+INTN
+EFIAPI
+SmBaseHobCompare (
+ IN CONST VOID *Buffer1,
+ IN CONST VOID *Buffer2
+ )
+{
+ if ((*(SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA **)Buffer1)->ProcessorIndex > (*(SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA **)Buffer2)->ProcessorIndex) {
+ return 1;
+ } else if ((*(SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA **)Buffer1)->ProcessorIndex < (*(SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA **)Buffer2)->ProcessorIndex) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ Extract SmBase for all CPU from SmmBase HOB.
+
+ @param[in] MaxNumberOfCpus Max NumberOfCpus.
+
+ @retval SmBaseBuffer Pointer to SmBase Buffer.
+ @retval NULL gSmmBaseHobGuid was not been created.
+**/
+UINTN *
+GetSmBase (
+ IN UINTN MaxNumberOfCpus
+ )
+{
+ UINTN HobCount;
+ EFI_HOB_GUID_TYPE *GuidHob;
+ SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA *SmmBaseHobData;
+ UINTN NumberOfProcessors;
+ SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA **SmBaseHobs;
+ UINTN *SmBaseBuffer;
+ UINTN HobIndex;
+ UINTN SortBuffer;
+ UINTN ProcessorIndex;
+ UINT64 PrevProcessorIndex;
+ EFI_HOB_GUID_TYPE *FirstSmmBaseGuidHob;
+
+ SmmBaseHobData = NULL;
+ HobIndex = 0;
+ ProcessorIndex = 0;
+ HobCount = 0;
+ NumberOfProcessors = 0;
+
+ FirstSmmBaseGuidHob = GetFirstGuidHob (&gSmmBaseHobGuid);
+ if (FirstSmmBaseGuidHob == NULL) {
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ GuidHob = FirstSmmBaseGuidHob;
+ while (GuidHob != NULL) {
+ HobCount++;
+ SmmBaseHobData = GET_GUID_HOB_DATA (GuidHob);
+ NumberOfProcessors += SmmBaseHobData->NumberOfProcessors;
+
+ if (NumberOfProcessors >= MaxNumberOfCpus) {
+ break;
+ }
+
+ GuidHob = GetNextGuidHob (&gSmmBaseHobGuid, GET_NEXT_HOB (GuidHob));
+ }
+
+ ASSERT (NumberOfProcessors == MaxNumberOfCpus);
+ if (NumberOfProcessors != MaxNumberOfCpus) {
+ CpuDeadLoop ();
+ }
+
+ SmBaseHobs = AllocatePool (sizeof (SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA *) * HobCount);
+ ASSERT (SmBaseHobs != NULL);
+ if (SmBaseHobs == NULL) {
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ //
+ // Record each SmmBaseHob pointer in the SmBaseHobs.
+ // The FirstSmmBaseGuidHob is to speed up this while-loop
+ // without needing to look for SmBaseHob from beginning.
+ //
+ GuidHob = FirstSmmBaseGuidHob;
+ while (HobIndex < HobCount) {
+ SmBaseHobs[HobIndex++] = GET_GUID_HOB_DATA (GuidHob);
+ GuidHob = GetNextGuidHob (&gSmmBaseHobGuid, GET_NEXT_HOB (GuidHob));
+ }
+
+ SmBaseBuffer = (UINTN *)AllocatePool (sizeof (UINTN) * (MaxNumberOfCpus));
+ ASSERT (SmBaseBuffer != NULL);
+ if (SmBaseBuffer == NULL) {
+ FreePool (SmBaseHobs);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ QuickSort (SmBaseHobs, HobCount, sizeof (SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA *), (BASE_SORT_COMPARE)SmBaseHobCompare, &SortBuffer);
+ PrevProcessorIndex = 0;
+ for (HobIndex = 0; HobIndex < HobCount; HobIndex++) {
+ //
+ // Make sure no overlap and no gap in the CPU range covered by each HOB
+ //
+ ASSERT (SmBaseHobs[HobIndex]->ProcessorIndex == PrevProcessorIndex);
+
+ //
+ // Cache each SmBase in order.
+ //
+ for (ProcessorIndex = 0; ProcessorIndex < SmBaseHobs[HobIndex]->NumberOfProcessors; ProcessorIndex++) {
+ SmBaseBuffer[PrevProcessorIndex + ProcessorIndex] = (UINTN)SmBaseHobs[HobIndex]->SmBase[ProcessorIndex];
+ }
+
+ PrevProcessorIndex += SmBaseHobs[HobIndex]->NumberOfProcessors;
+ }
+
+ FreePool (SmBaseHobs);
+ return SmBaseBuffer;
+}
+
/**
Function to compare 2 MP_INFORMATION2_HOB_DATA pointer based on ProcessorIndex.
@@ -743,27 +869,22 @@ PiCpuSmmEntry (
IN EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable
)
{
- EFI_STATUS Status;
- UINTN Index;
- VOID *Buffer;
- UINTN BufferPages;
- UINTN TileCodeSize;
- UINTN TileDataSize;
- UINTN TileSize;
- UINT8 *Stacks;
- VOID *Registration;
- UINT32 RegEax;
- UINT32 RegEbx;
- UINT32 RegEcx;
- UINT32 RegEdx;
- UINTN FamilyId;
- UINTN ModelId;
- UINT32 Cr3;
- EFI_HOB_GUID_TYPE *GuidHob;
- SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA *SmmBaseHobData;
-
- GuidHob = NULL;
- SmmBaseHobData = NULL;
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ UINTN Index;
+ VOID *Buffer;
+ UINTN BufferPages;
+ UINTN TileCodeSize;
+ UINTN TileDataSize;
+ UINTN TileSize;
+ UINT8 *Stacks;
+ VOID *Registration;
+ UINT32 RegEax;
+ UINT32 RegEbx;
+ UINT32 RegEcx;
+ UINT32 RegEdx;
+ UINTN FamilyId;
+ UINTN ModelId;
+ UINT32 Cr3;
PERF_FUNCTION_BEGIN ();
@@ -985,23 +1106,19 @@ PiCpuSmmEntry (
// Retrive the allocated SmmBase from gSmmBaseHobGuid. If found,
// means the SmBase relocation has been done.
//
- GuidHob = GetFirstGuidHob (&gSmmBaseHobGuid);
- if (GuidHob != NULL) {
+ mCpuHotPlugData.SmBase = GetSmBase (mMaxNumberOfCpus);
+ if (mCpuHotPlugData.SmBase != NULL) {
//
// Check whether the Required TileSize is enough.
//
if (TileSize > SIZE_8KB) {
DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "The Range of Smbase in SMRAM is not enough -- Required TileSize = 0x%08x, Actual TileSize = 0x%08x\n", TileSize, SIZE_8KB));
+ FreePool (mCpuHotPlugData.SmBase);
+ FreePool (gSmmCpuPrivate->ProcessorInfo);
CpuDeadLoop ();
return RETURN_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL;
}
- SmmBaseHobData = GET_GUID_HOB_DATA (GuidHob);
-
- //
- // Assume single instance of HOB produced, expect the HOB.NumberOfProcessors equals to the mMaxNumberOfCpus.
- //
- ASSERT (SmmBaseHobData->NumberOfProcessors == (UINT32)mMaxNumberOfCpus && SmmBaseHobData->ProcessorIndex == 0);
mSmmRelocated = TRUE;
} else {
//
@@ -1047,8 +1164,6 @@ PiCpuSmmEntry (
//
mCpuHotPlugData.ApicId = (UINT64 *)AllocatePool (sizeof (UINT64) * mMaxNumberOfCpus);
ASSERT (mCpuHotPlugData.ApicId != NULL);
- mCpuHotPlugData.SmBase = (UINTN *)AllocatePool (sizeof (UINTN) * mMaxNumberOfCpus);
- ASSERT (mCpuHotPlugData.SmBase != NULL);
mCpuHotPlugData.ArrayLength = (UINT32)mMaxNumberOfCpus;
//
@@ -1057,7 +1172,9 @@ PiCpuSmmEntry (
// size for each CPU in the platform
//
for (Index = 0; Index < mMaxNumberOfCpus; Index++) {
- mCpuHotPlugData.SmBase[Index] = mSmmRelocated ? (UINTN)SmmBaseHobData->SmBase[Index] : (UINTN)Buffer + Index * TileSize - SMM_HANDLER_OFFSET;
+ if (!mSmmRelocated) {
+ mCpuHotPlugData.SmBase[Index] = (UINTN)Buffer + Index * TileSize - SMM_HANDLER_OFFSET;
+ }
gSmmCpuPrivate->CpuSaveStateSize[Index] = sizeof (SMRAM_SAVE_STATE_MAP);
gSmmCpuPrivate->CpuSaveState[Index] = (VOID *)(mCpuHotPlugData.SmBase[Index] + SMRAM_SAVE_STATE_MAP_OFFSET);
--
2.31.1.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#112224): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/112224
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103052271/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 9:54 [edk2-devel] [Patch V3 0/6] Create and consume a new gMpInformationHobGuid2 in UefiCpuPkg duntan
2023-12-08 9:54 ` [edk2-devel] [Patch V3 2/6] UefiCpuPkg: Build MpInfo2HOB in CpuMpPei duntan
2023-12-08 9:54 ` [edk2-devel] [Patch V3 3/6] UefiCpuPkg: Consume MpInfo2Hob in PiSmmCpuDxe duntan
2023-12-08 9:54 ` duntan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231208095443.1328-4-dun.tan@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox