From: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>,
Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add support for multiple HOBs to MpInitLibInitialize
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:01:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222160106.686484-5-kraxel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222160106.686484-1-kraxel@redhat.com>
Loop over all MP_HAND_OFF HOBs instead of expecting a single HOB
covering all CPUs in the system.
Add a new FirstMpHandOff variable, which caches the first HOB body for
faster lookups. It is also used to check whenever MP_HAND_OFF HOBs are
present. Using the MpHandOff pointer for that does not work any more
because the variable will be NULL at the end of HOB loops.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
---
UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index 8eab8b636d78..4b6d6d02b027 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -2025,6 +2025,7 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
VOID
)
{
+ MP_HAND_OFF *FirstMpHandOff;
MP_HAND_OFF *MpHandOff;
CPU_INFO_IN_HOB *CpuInfoInHob;
UINT32 MaxLogicalProcessorNumber;
@@ -2038,17 +2039,31 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
CPU_MP_DATA *CpuMpData;
UINT8 ApLoopMode;
UINT8 *MonitorBuffer;
- UINTN Index;
+ UINT32 Index, HobIndex;
UINTN ApResetVectorSizeBelow1Mb;
UINTN ApResetVectorSizeAbove1Mb;
UINTN BackupBufferAddr;
UINTN ApIdtBase;
- MpHandOff = GetNextMpHandOffHob (NULL);
- if (MpHandOff == NULL) {
+ FirstMpHandOff = GetNextMpHandOffHob (NULL);
+ if (FirstMpHandOff != NULL) {
+ MaxLogicalProcessorNumber = 0;
+ for (MpHandOff = FirstMpHandOff;
+ MpHandOff != NULL;
+ MpHandOff = GetNextMpHandOffHob (MpHandOff))
+ {
+ DEBUG ((
+ DEBUG_INFO,
+ "%a: ProcessorIndex=%u CpuCount=%u\n",
+ __func__,
+ MpHandOff->ProcessorIndex,
+ MpHandOff->CpuCount
+ ));
+ ASSERT (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber == MpHandOff->ProcessorIndex);
+ MaxLogicalProcessorNumber += MpHandOff->CpuCount;
+ }
+ } else {
MaxLogicalProcessorNumber = PcdGet32 (PcdCpuMaxLogicalProcessorNumber);
- } else {
- MaxLogicalProcessorNumber = MpHandOff->CpuCount;
}
ASSERT (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber != 0);
@@ -2192,7 +2207,7 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
//
ProgramVirtualWireMode ();
- if (MpHandOff == NULL) {
+ if (FirstMpHandOff == NULL) {
if (MaxLogicalProcessorNumber > 1) {
//
// Wakeup all APs and calculate the processor count in system
@@ -2208,21 +2223,32 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
AmdSevUpdateCpuMpData (CpuMpData);
}
- CpuMpData->CpuCount = MpHandOff->CpuCount;
- CpuMpData->BspNumber = GetBspNumber (MpHandOff);
+ CpuMpData->CpuCount = MaxLogicalProcessorNumber;
+ CpuMpData->BspNumber = GetBspNumber (FirstMpHandOff);
CpuInfoInHob = (CPU_INFO_IN_HOB *)(UINTN)CpuMpData->CpuInfoInHob;
- for (Index = 0; Index < CpuMpData->CpuCount; Index++) {
- InitializeSpinLock (&CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].ApLock);
- CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].CpuHealthy = (MpHandOff->Info[Index].Health == 0) ? TRUE : FALSE;
- CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].ApFunction = 0;
- CpuInfoInHob[Index].InitialApicId = MpHandOff->Info[Index].ApicId;
- CpuInfoInHob[Index].ApTopOfStack = CpuMpData->Buffer + (Index + 1) * CpuMpData->CpuApStackSize;
- CpuInfoInHob[Index].ApicId = MpHandOff->Info[Index].ApicId;
- CpuInfoInHob[Index].Health = MpHandOff->Info[Index].Health;
+ for (MpHandOff = FirstMpHandOff;
+ MpHandOff != NULL;
+ MpHandOff = GetNextMpHandOffHob (MpHandOff))
+ {
+ for (HobIndex = 0; HobIndex < MpHandOff->CpuCount; HobIndex++) {
+ Index = MpHandOff->ProcessorIndex + HobIndex;
+ InitializeSpinLock (&CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].ApLock);
+ CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].CpuHealthy = (MpHandOff->Info[HobIndex].Health == 0) ? TRUE : FALSE;
+ CpuMpData->CpuData[Index].ApFunction = 0;
+ CpuInfoInHob[Index].InitialApicId = MpHandOff->Info[HobIndex].ApicId;
+ CpuInfoInHob[Index].ApTopOfStack = CpuMpData->Buffer + (Index + 1) * CpuMpData->CpuApStackSize;
+ CpuInfoInHob[Index].ApicId = MpHandOff->Info[HobIndex].ApicId;
+ CpuInfoInHob[Index].Health = MpHandOff->Info[HobIndex].Health;
+ }
}
- DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "MpHandOff->WaitLoopExecutionMode: %04d, sizeof (VOID *): %04d\n", MpHandOff->WaitLoopExecutionMode, sizeof (VOID *)));
- if (MpHandOff->WaitLoopExecutionMode == sizeof (VOID *)) {
+ DEBUG ((
+ DEBUG_INFO,
+ "FirstMpHandOff->WaitLoopExecutionMode: %04d, sizeof (VOID *): %04d\n",
+ FirstMpHandOff->WaitLoopExecutionMode,
+ sizeof (VOID *)
+ ));
+ if (FirstMpHandOff->WaitLoopExecutionMode == sizeof (VOID *)) {
ASSERT (CpuMpData->ApLoopMode != ApInHltLoop);
CpuMpData->FinishedCount = 0;
@@ -2238,7 +2264,7 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
// enables the APs to switch to a different memory section and continue their
// looping process there.
//
- SwitchApContext (MpHandOff);
+ SwitchApContext (FirstMpHandOff);
//
// Wait for all APs finished initialization
//
@@ -2287,7 +2313,7 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
// Wakeup APs to do some AP initialize sync (Microcode & MTRR)
//
if (CpuMpData->CpuCount > 1) {
- if (MpHandOff != NULL) {
+ if (FirstMpHandOff != NULL) {
//
// Only needs to use this flag for DXE phase to update the wake up
// buffer. Wakeup buffer allocated in PEI phase is no longer valid
@@ -2304,7 +2330,7 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
CpuPause ();
}
- if (MpHandOff != NULL) {
+ if (FirstMpHandOff != NULL) {
CpuMpData->InitFlag = ApInitDone;
}
--
2.43.2
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#115829): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/115829
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104510909/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-22 16:01 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add support for multiple MP_HAND_OFF HOBs Gerd Hoffmann
2024-02-22 16:01 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add support for multiple HOBs to GetMpHandOffHob Gerd Hoffmann
2024-02-23 2:35 ` Ni, Ray
2024-02-26 13:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-22 16:01 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add support for multiple HOBs to GetBspNumber() Gerd Hoffmann
2024-02-22 16:01 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 3/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add support for multiple HOBs to SwitchApContext() Gerd Hoffmann
2024-02-22 16:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2024-02-26 13:51 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add support for multiple HOBs to MpInitLibInitialize Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-22 16:01 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add support for multiple HOBs to SaveCpuMpData() Gerd Hoffmann
2024-02-23 2:16 ` Ni, Ray
2024-02-26 13:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-26 13:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-22 16:01 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: return early in GetBspNumber() Gerd Hoffmann
2024-02-23 2:33 ` Ni, Ray
2024-02-26 13:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-26 14:01 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-26 15:08 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Add support for multiple MP_HAND_OFF HOBs Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-26 15:41 ` Joey Vagedes via groups.io
2024-02-26 16:01 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-26 16:02 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-26 15:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-26 22:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-02-27 6:28 ` Ni, Ray
2024-02-27 12:11 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240222160106.686484-5-kraxel@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox