From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.189.1587507251953960086 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:14:12 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jR19e-0005pE-Cp; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:14:10 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jR19d-0006eH-P3; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:14:10 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F10160CB5; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:14:09 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id O2u2NvKTIvgn; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:14:09 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (muon.bluestop.org [65.103.231.193]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D65D160CA8; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:14:09 -0600 (MDT) To: Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io Cc: Jordan Justen , Ard Biesheuvel References: <11866fb0-09fb-b6a8-11e8-b3528eb433b9@redhat.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <207dd8a8-f834-f727-3c4f-af1d5d8f3b45@bsdio.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:14:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <11866fb0-09fb-b6a8-11e8-b3528eb433b9@redhat.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1jR19d-0006eH-P3;;;mid=<207dd8a8-f834-f727-3c4f-af1d5d8f3b45@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa04.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4957] * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 328 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 13 (4.1%), b_tie_ro: 12 (3.5%), parse: 1.62 (0.5%), extract_message_metadata: 6 (1.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.86 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.0 (1.2%), tests_pri_-950: 1.94 (0.6%), tests_pri_-900: 1.60 (0.5%), tests_pri_-90: 58 (17.8%), check_bayes: 56 (17.1%), b_tokenize: 7 (2.3%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.8%), b_comp_prob: 2.6 (0.8%), b_tok_touch_all: 37 (11.2%), b_finish: 1.05 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 222 (67.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.66 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 69 (21.1%), poll_dns_idle: 62 (18.7%), tests_pri_10: 3.9 (1.2%), tests_pri_500: 12 (3.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 02/13] OvmfPkg: support powering off bhyve guests X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 4/17/20 2:55 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > In this patch, we should follow the pattern seen in patch#1 -- new, > bhyve-specific library instance. > > However, this library has hugely bit-rotted, and it needs some serious > scrubbing before we can do that. Let me look into a patch series for > that. I'll continue to review of this series after that. I hope that > works for you. Thanks. As I explained earlier today, but should have mentioned earlier, I decided to drop this patch from the series and revisit this later. I've now got your ResetSystemLib patches applied to my tree and am starting working on this again. -- Rebecca Cran