From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, liming.gao@intel.com, "Kinney,
Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Shenglei" <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Feng, Bob C" <bob.c.feng@intel.com>,
"Leif Lindholm (Nuvia address)" <leif@nuviainc.com>,
Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] BaseTools/PatchCheck.py: Add LicenseCheck
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:13:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21694fd0-aa33-0865-2da8-dec2821deb4c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR11MB397291A192469A2D4E6E850B80D20@BN6PR11MB3972.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 04/22/20 18:01, Liming Gao wrote:
> Mike:
> The checker purpose is to make sure the correct license be used for new added file. If the file has the different license, it should be reviewed carefully.
>
> I remember we still have one open for third party non bsd+patent code (the detail can refer to https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41639). Now, there is no non bsd+patent license files to be added in edk2 after edk2 switches to bsd+patent license.
Some files introduced by Rebecca's BhyvePkg patch series come under the
2-clause BSD License, and not the 2-clause BSD + Patent License. And
Rebecca cannot relicense them because she's not the (sole) copyright holder.
Readme.md states:
4. It is preferred that contributions are submitted using the same
copyright license as the base project. When that is not possible,
then contributions using the following licenses can be accepted:
* BSD (2-clause): http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause
* BSD (3-clause): http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause
* MIT: http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
* Python-2.0: http://opensource.org/licenses/Python-2.0
* Zlib: http://opensource.org/licenses/Zlib
[...]
Contributions using other licenses might be accepted, but further
review will be required.
This seems to imply that the "normal" 2-clause BSDL does not require
"further review".
Thanks
Laszlo
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 11:41 PM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Cc: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
>> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] BaseTools/PatchCheck.py: Add LicenseCheck
>>
>> Hi Liming,
>>
>> I do not see this change checking that the license is in a proper
>> SPDX Identifier statement?
>>
>> https://spdx.org/ids-how
>>
>> Only checking the for a license name is not sufficient.
>>
>> A file may be covered by more than one license. What is the behavior in
>> this case?
>>
>> The EDK II project has BSD-2-Clause-Patent as the preferred license, but
>> other licenses are allowed. We use PatchCheck.py in EDK II CI. Will this
>> change block file added with a different allowed license?
>>
>> I think these questions should be addressed in the file header of this
>> source file, so the behavior of PatchCheck.py is clearly defined.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On
>>> Behalf Of Liming Gao
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 12:02 AM
>>> To: Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>;
>>> devel@edk2.groups.io
>>> Cc: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH]
>>> BaseTools/PatchCheck.py: Add LicenseCheck
>>>
>>> Shenglei:
>>> Please submit BZ to describe it. The license should
>>> be BSD-2-Clause-Patent.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Liming
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 2:57 PM
>>>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>>>> Cc: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Gao, Liming
>>> <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] BaseTools/PatchCheck.py: Add
>>> LicenseCheck
>>>>
>>>> For files to be added to the tree, this feature will
>>> check
>>>> whether it has BSD license.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang
>>> <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck.py | 52
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck.py
>>> b/BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck.py
>>>> index 13da6967785d..15663d02a3c0 100755
>>>> --- a/BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck.py
>>>> +++ b/BaseTools/Scripts/PatchCheck.py
>>>> @@ -491,6 +491,53 @@ class GitDiffCheck:
>>>> print(prefix, line)
>>>> count += 1
>>>>
>>>> +class LicenseCheck():
>>>> +
>>>> + def __init__(self, diff):
>>>> + self.ok = True
>>>> + self.startcheck = False
>>>> + self.license = True
>>>> + lines = diff.splitlines(True)
>>>> + count = len(lines)
>>>> + line_index = 0
>>>> + for line in lines:
>>>> + if line.startswith('--- /dev/null'):
>>>> + nextline = lines[line_index + 1]
>>>> + added_file =
>>> self.Readdedfileformat.search(nextline).group(1)
>>>> + added_file_extension =
>>> os.path.splitext(added_file)[1]
>>>> + if added_file_extension in
>>> self.file_extension_list:
>>>> + self.startcheck = True
>>>> + self.license = False
>>>> + if self.startcheck and self.license_name
>>> in line:
>>>> + self.license = True
>>>> + if line_index + 1 == count or
>>> lines[line_index + 1].startswith('diff --') and
>>> self.startcheck:
>>>> + if not self.license:
>>>> + self.error(added_file)
>>>> + self.startcheck = False
>>>> + self.license = True
>>>> + line_index = line_index + 1
>>>> +
>>>> + def error(self, *err):
>>>> + if self.ok and Verbose.level >
>>> Verbose.ONELINE:
>>>> + print('License is missing!')
>>>> + self.ok = False
>>>> + if Verbose.level < Verbose.NORMAL:
>>>> + return
>>>> + count = 0
>>>> + for line in err:
>>>> + prefix = (' *', ' ')[count > 0]
>>>> + error_format = 'Missing license in:'
>>>> + print(prefix, error_format, line)
>>>> + count += 1
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> + license_name = 'BSD-2-Clause-Patent'
>>>> +
>>>> + Readdedfileformat = re.compile(r'\+\+\+
>>> b\/(.*)\n')
>>>> +
>>>> + file_extension_list = [".c", ".h", ".inf",
>>> ".dsc", ".dec", ".py", ".bat", ".sh", ".uni", ".yaml",
>>> ".fdf", ".inc"]
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> class CheckOnePatch:
>>>> """Checks the contents of a git email formatted
>>> patch.
>>>>
>>>> @@ -508,12 +555,15 @@ class CheckOnePatch:
>>>> msg_check =
>>> CommitMessageCheck(self.commit_subject,
>>> self.commit_msg)
>>>> msg_ok = msg_check.ok
>>>>
>>>> + license_check = LicenseCheck(self.diff)
>>>> + license_ok = license_check.ok
>>>> +
>>>> diff_ok = True
>>>> if self.diff is not None:
>>>> diff_check = GitDiffCheck(self.diff)
>>>> diff_ok = diff_check.ok
>>>>
>>>> - self.ok = email_ok and msg_ok and diff_ok
>>>> + self.ok = email_ok and msg_ok and diff_ok
>>> and license_ok
>>>>
>>>> if Verbose.level == Verbose.ONELINE:
>>>> if self.ok:
>>>> --
>>>> 2.18.0.windows.1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-24 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 6:56 [PATCH] BaseTools/PatchCheck.py: Add LicenseCheck Zhang, Shenglei
2020-04-22 7:01 ` Liming Gao
2020-04-22 15:41 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael D Kinney
2020-04-22 16:01 ` Liming Gao
2020-04-24 16:13 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-04-24 16:25 ` Leif Lindholm
[not found] ` <dcfe88b6-f4cf-cea0-ca93-3d5b15548c4f@redhat.com>
2020-04-28 15:01 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21694fd0-aa33-0865-2da8-dec2821deb4c@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox