From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: leif.lindholm@linaro.org, ray.ni@intel.com, afish@apple.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ArmPkg/PlatformBmLib: defer GOP console discovery after Driver#### dispatch
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:50:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23a9be06-791f-517a-ccd4-fd36c93af8b0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115102217.3027-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Hi Ard,
On 01/15/20 11:22, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Currently, ArmPkg's implementation of PlatformBootManagerBeforeConsole()
> iterates over all PCI I/O handles in the database and connects the ones
> that may produce an instance of the Graphics Output Protocol (GOP) once
> connected. After that, it enumerates all the GOP instances and adds them
> to the stdout/stderr console variables so that they will be used for
> console output.
>
> At this point in the boot, the BDS has not dispatched drivers loaded via
> Driver#### options yet, making Driver#### options unsuitable for loading
> drivers that are needed to produce GOP consoles. This is unfortunate, since
> it prevents us from using commodity GFX hardware that ships without AARCH64
> option ROMs on AARCH64 hardware and load the driver from the ESP.
>
> So let's fix this, by deferring the discovery of PCI backed GOP instances
> until PlatformBootManagerAfterConsole(). Note that non-PCI GOP instances
> are still connected in the original spot, so platform framebuffers will
> still work as before. Also note that the entire dance of connecting PCI
> root bridges and I/O handles, matching PCI class codes and updating console
> variables is all encapsulated in EfiBootManagerConnectVideoController(),
> so let's just call that from PlatformBootManagerAfterConsole().
I too have learned about the EfiBootManagerConnectVideoController() ACPI
just recently, when Ray mentioned it.
(1) When we call EfiBootManagerConnectVideoController() with a NULL
parameter, it further calls BmGetVideoController(), which does the
"dance" you mention. This wasn't obvious to me from the commit message,
so I'd suggest mentioning BmGetVideoController() there, by name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Tested on AMD Overdrive with an AMD Radeon GPU plugged in and the
> AARCH64 AmdGop.efi driver loaded via Driver0000.
>
> ArmPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/PlatformBm.c | 81 ++------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/PlatformBm.c b/ArmPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/PlatformBm.c
> index e6e788e0f107..7c63a7b98847 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/PlatformBm.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/PlatformBm.c
> @@ -219,66 +219,6 @@ FilterAndProcess (
> }
>
>
> -/**
> - This FILTER_FUNCTION checks if a handle corresponds to a PCI display device.
> -**/
> -STATIC
> -BOOLEAN
> -EFIAPI
> -IsPciDisplay (
> - IN EFI_HANDLE Handle,
> - IN CONST CHAR16 *ReportText
> - )
> -{
> - EFI_STATUS Status;
> - EFI_PCI_IO_PROTOCOL *PciIo;
> - PCI_TYPE00 Pci;
> -
> - Status = gBS->HandleProtocol (Handle, &gEfiPciIoProtocolGuid,
> - (VOID**)&PciIo);
> - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> - //
> - // This is not an error worth reporting.
> - //
> - return FALSE;
> - }
> -
> - Status = PciIo->Pci.Read (PciIo, EfiPciIoWidthUint32, 0 /* Offset */,
> - sizeof Pci / sizeof (UINT32), &Pci);
> - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> - DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: %s: %r\n", __FUNCTION__, ReportText, Status));
> - return FALSE;
> - }
> -
> - return IS_PCI_DISPLAY (&Pci);
> -}
> -
> -
> -/**
> - This CALLBACK_FUNCTION attempts to connect a handle non-recursively, asking
> - the matching driver to produce all first-level child handles.
> -**/
> -STATIC
> -VOID
> -EFIAPI
> -Connect (
> - IN EFI_HANDLE Handle,
> - IN CONST CHAR16 *ReportText
> - )
> -{
> - EFI_STATUS Status;
> -
> - Status = gBS->ConnectController (
> - Handle, // ControllerHandle
> - NULL, // DriverImageHandle
> - NULL, // RemainingDevicePath -- produce all children
> - FALSE // Recursive
> - );
> - DEBUG ((EFI_ERROR (Status) ? EFI_D_ERROR : EFI_D_VERBOSE, "%a: %s: %r\n",
> - __FUNCTION__, ReportText, Status));
> -}
> -
> -
> /**
> This CALLBACK_FUNCTION retrieves the EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL from the
> handle, and adds it to ConOut and ErrOut.
> @@ -554,20 +494,6 @@ PlatformBootManagerBeforeConsole (
> //
> EfiBootManagerDispatchDeferredImages ();
>
> - //
> - // Locate the PCI root bridges and make the PCI bus driver connect each,
> - // non-recursively. This will produce a number of child handles with PciIo on
> - // them.
> - //
> - FilterAndProcess (&gEfiPciRootBridgeIoProtocolGuid, NULL, Connect);
> -
> - //
> - // Find all display class PCI devices (using the handles from the previous
> - // step), and connect them non-recursively. This should produce a number of
> - // child handles with GOPs on them.
> - //
> - FilterAndProcess (&gEfiPciIoProtocolGuid, IsPciDisplay, Connect);
> -
> //
> // Now add the device path of all handles with GOP on them to ConOut and
> // ErrOut.
(2) Second, BmGetVideoController() differs from the logic that's being
removed here. I see two differences:
(2a) the IsPciDisplay() helper function uses IS_PCI_DISPLAY(), while
BmGetVideoController() uses IS_PCI_VGA().
Interestingly, there is a comment:
// TODO: use IS_PCI_DISPLAY??
If I understand correctly, IS_PCI_VGA() matches a subset of
IS_PCI_DISPLAY(), namely the such devices that offer legacy BIOS VGA
interfaces (IO ports and whatnot). In support of my understanding,
please see:
- 4fdb585c69d6 ("OvmfPkg/PlatformBootManagerLib: relax device class
requirement for ConOut", 2016-09-01)
- commit 70dbd16361ee ("OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: Add SubClass field to
QEMU_VIDEO_CARD", 2018-05-17)
Thus, IS_PCI_VGA() appears overly restrictive *especially* on AARCH64,
where you are more likely to encounter "VGA legacy"-free PCI graphics
cards than on x86.
Now, this doesn't necessarily mean "ArmPkg/PlatformBmLib" needs to use
its own IS_PCI_DISPLAY logic -- we could also turn the comment in
BmGetVideoController() into actual code, as an alternative.
(2b) The other difference is that BmGetVideoController() only grabs the
first video controller it finds, and runs with it. Whereas, logic being
removed here would connect (and add, to ConOut/StdErr) *all* PCI video
controllers. I think that's nicer in a multi-controller setup.
> @@ -674,6 +600,13 @@ PlatformBootManagerAfterConsole (
> UINTN PosX;
> UINTN PosY;
>
> + //
> + // Defer this call to PlatformBootManagerAfterConsole () so that devices
> + // managed by drivers that were loaded via Driver#### options are covered
> + // as well.
> + //
> + EfiBootManagerConnectVideoController (NULL);
> +
> FirmwareVerLength = StrLen (PcdGetPtr (PcdFirmwareVersionString));
>
> //
>
(3) So how about the following approach:
(3a) factor the following sequence:
FilterAndProcess (&gEfiPciIoProtocolGuid, IsPciDisplay, Connect);
FilterAndProcess (&gEfiGraphicsOutputProtocolGuid, NULL, AddOutput);
out to a helper function,
(3b) call the extracted sequence in *both* its current place, *and* at
the top of PlatformBootManagerAfterConsole() (instead of
EfiBootManagerConnectVideoController())?
?
I expect this should give you *some* consoles in BeforeConsole() (on
such PCI and non-PCI graphics controllers whose drivers are in the
platform firmware), just to be safe; and *all* the rest would be picked
up in AfterConsole().
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 10:22 [RFC PATCH] ArmPkg/PlatformBmLib: defer GOP console discovery after Driver#### dispatch Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-15 12:50 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-01-15 13:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-01-15 14:52 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-01-15 14:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23a9be06-791f-517a-ccd4-fd36c93af8b0@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox