From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.120])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.8904.1589527748088930241
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Fri, 15 May 2020 00:29:08 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SPkDfLJz;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 207.211.31.120, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1589527747;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=UGMXF477v2XWP/tghJInBaVdtv7wfymd+5OLapeblWU=;
	b=SPkDfLJzmPADutTvD/pXosFc4QOE2ZcgLZxgI00al/Akw6YQDOIGzLNgVtALL2KPFblkBf
	SZBM8UXJeBFDBAADM+s90+FPrh5k0zkLpyHGkDLvJYOpN9UhM2nYSvUtnb3yXHZnjILR1R
	1fAT4OTOKu9aJlL2MKY8dk3SueXspJE=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-321-dWkXKKY8P-ifIcrbpZV3Vg-1; Fri, 15 May 2020 03:29:03 -0400
X-MC-Unique: dWkXKKY8P-ifIcrbpZV3Vg-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D22AE100CCC6;
	Fri, 15 May 2020 07:29:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-113-220.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.220])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E89462B1E;
	Fri, 15 May 2020 07:28:59 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 06/11] ArmVirtPkg: Add kvmtool platform driver
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io,
 Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Cc: leif@nuviainc.com, Alexandru.Elisei@arm.com, Andre.Przywara@arm.com,
 Matteo.Carlini@arm.com, Laura.Moretta@arm.com, nd@arm.com
References: <20200514084019.71368-1-sami.mujawar@arm.com>
 <20200514084019.71368-7-sami.mujawar@arm.com>
 <fc4c2d78-0c9b-726b-f569-d09bc93bafb0@arm.com>
 <71feb4af-94a7-defe-c978-5a1775cc7665@redhat.com>
 <b9485d8c-3194-f2e8-94bb-87f9ba0e4f5f@arm.com>
 <fd6371a5-5bd7-39d2-63e1-af0eecffc6d2@redhat.com>
 <19552590-40c3-99ef-73ca-0ece525a7af7@arm.com>
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <250dadd0-c17f-fbcb-8b6e-7b620cab5f5d@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 09:28:58 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19552590-40c3-99ef-73ca-0ece525a7af7@arm.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 05/14/20 19:25, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

> We just have to decide whether designated reviewer or maintainer is the
> most appropriate. I am fine with either, and I am willing to share the
> burden with Sami too.
> 

Ah, OK, sorry, I misunderstood -- I missed that we were discussing "R"
vs. "M" for "ArmVirtPkg: Kvmtool emulated platform support", and not
whether we should have a section at all for "ArmVirtPkg: Kvmtool
emulated platform support".

So with this in mind, I think "R" would be more appropriate. That seems
to be the tradition when subdividing packages (compare "ArmVirtPkg:
modules used on Xen", "MdeModulePkg: [...]", "OvmfPkg: [...]").

Thanks for clarifying!
Laszlo