From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-staging/RiscV64QemuVirt PATCH V7 08/20] UefiCpuPkg/CpuTimerLib: Add RISC-V instance
To: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>,devel@edk2.groups.io
From: dhaval@rivosinc.com
X-Originating-Location: Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN (171.76.82.41)
X-Originating-Platform: Linux Chrome 109
User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 03:07:22 -0800
References: <20230128191807.2080547-9-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230128191807.2080547-9-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <26729.1675076842313624896@groups.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="ObJgKB6a6gGgfszRc3iL"

--ObJgKB6a6gGgfszRc3iL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wonder if it will be better to use single inf file (inside CPUTimerLib) wit=
h
SOURCES.RISCV64 or current implementation is recommended?

--ObJgKB6a6gGgfszRc3iL
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wonder if it will be better to use single inf file (inside CPUTimerLib) wit=
h<br />SOURCES.RISCV64 or current implementation is recommended?<br /><span=
 style=3D"background-color: #282a36; color: #f8f8f2; font-family: 'Droid Sa=
ns Mono', 'monospace', monospace; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre;"><br /=
><br /><br /></span>

--ObJgKB6a6gGgfszRc3iL--