From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Shah, Tapan" <tapandshah@hpe.com>,
"edk2-devel@ml01.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>, Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ShellPkg: fix assertion failure encountered with "devtree" and "dh -d -v"
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:35:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26fb16df-b2c2-a65a-54a9-4815b3e6c259@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CS1PR84MB02297F78270E55CC1EEC4EDCD4FB0@CS1PR84MB0229.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On 09/08/16 19:09, Shah, Tapan wrote:
> Typo..... Missing company's copyright message in both changed files*
Bah, I don't care about that for files that exist, the git log is just fine for that. :) I am aware that a copyright notice is required for new files, and I do comply with that absolutely. I also never touch copyright lines belonging to other companies (big no-no).
But, I generally don't litter my patches with RH copyright lines (or copyright line updates) for files that already exist -- other companies may require their associates to do so (I recall such hunks from Intel), but we don't do that (not just in edk2, but as far as I am aware, in any of the other projects where we modify files -- QEMU and the Linux kernel are the most direct examples I can think of).
For example, in Linux, the "arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c" file still says:
/*
* Kernel-based Virtual Machine driver for Linux
*
* This module enables machines with Intel VT-x extensions to run virtual
* machines without emulation or binary translation.
*
* Copyright (C) 2006 Qumranet, Inc.
* Copyright 2010 Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
*
* Authors:
* Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
* Yaniv Kamay <yaniv@qumranet.com>
*
* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See
* the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
*
*/
Funnily enough, the Red Hat line was added in kernel commit 221d059d15f1c ("KVM: Update Red Hat copyrights") in 2010, even though RH acquired Qumranet in 2008 (according to Wikipedia).
But, I digress. I think the current patches satisfy "ShellPkg/Contributions.txt". I do thank you for pointing this out: if I were responsible for sticking the explicit (C) RH notice in every preexistent file I touch, I'd definitely fix up the patches now.
Thank you!
Laszlo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shah, Tapan
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 12:09 PM
> To: 'Laszlo Ersek' <lersek@redhat.com>; edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
> Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>; Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 0/2] ShellPkg: fix assertion failure encountered with "devtree" and "dh -d -v"
>
> Missing company's copyright message in both changed filed. Code works fine on NT32.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tapan Shah <tapandshah@hpe.com>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 11:14 AM
> To: edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
> Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>; Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/2] ShellPkg: fix assertion failure encountered with "devtree" and "dh -d -v"
>
> Tapan reported
> <https://tianocore.acgmultimedia.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112>. Since I had encountered the problem myself, and now managed to find a tiny time slot, I looked into it. Patch #2 is the fix; patch #1 cleans up a small wart that I came across while studying the code.
>
> Public branch: <https://github.com/lersek/edk2/commits/childctrl>.
>
> Tapan, can you please test the series, and respond with your Tested-by?
> Thanks!
>
> Cc: Jaben Carsey <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Tapan Shah <tapandshah@hpe.com>
>
> Cheers,
> Laszlo
>
> Laszlo Ersek (2):
> ShellPkg/UefiHandleParsingLib: fix IN/OUT notation in child ctrlr
> parsing
> ShellPkg/UefiHandleParsingLib: fix retval for empty child controller
> array
>
> ShellPkg/Include/Library/HandleParsingLib.h | 4 ++--
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiHandleParsingLib/UefiHandleParsingLib.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.9.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-08 16:14 [PATCH 0/2] ShellPkg: fix assertion failure encountered with "devtree" and "dh -d -v" Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-08 16:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] ShellPkg/UefiHandleParsingLib: fix IN/OUT notation in child ctrlr parsing Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-08 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] ShellPkg/UefiHandleParsingLib: fix retval for empty child controller array Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-08 16:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] ShellPkg: fix assertion failure encountered with "devtree" and "dh -d -v" Carsey, Jaben
2016-09-08 17:08 ` Shah, Tapan
2016-09-08 17:09 ` Shah, Tapan
2016-09-08 18:35 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-09-08 18:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26fb16df-b2c2-a65a-54a9-4815b3e6c259@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox