From: "Marcin Juszkiewicz" <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
Subject: [edk2-devel] ArmCallSmc() and SMCCC specification
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 09:14:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28f07a88-f664-43f4-871d-b5d0b82c7727@linaro.org> (raw)
EDK2/ArmPkg/Library/ArmSmcLib has code to do SMC calls.
There are ArmCallSmc[0-3]() functions for up to 3 arguments/results and
ArmCallSmc() function which can use 7 arguments and get 4 results back.
This implementation looks like version B (Nov 2016) of SMCCC
specification [1] with one more register used.
1. https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/b/
In 2020 we got version C of spec (and then D, E, F) which allows to use
more registers:
> Allow R4—R7 (SMC32/HVC32) to be used as result registers.
> Allow X8—X17 to be used as parameter registers in SMC64/HVC64.
> Allow X4—X17 to be used as result registers in SMC64/HVC64.
And I started to wonder how to update EDK2 to newer version of SMCCC
spec as one of in-progress QemuSbsa SMC calls may return more than 4 values.
ARM_SMC_ARGS in ArmSmcLib.h can be expanded to handle up to Arg17 in an
easy way and guarded by "#if defined(__aarch64__)" to not change it on
Arm32.
Then ArmCallSmc() in {AArch64,Arm}/ArmSmc.S needs changes. But here it
gets tricky.
On Arm we preserve r4-r8 and restore them after call like spec says.
Which we do not do on AArch64 as version B of spec did not required that
(and this changed in version C).
If we start handling more than 4 results then we need to know how many
results are expected and restore rest of r4-r7/x4-x17 registers:
> When an SMC32/HVC32 call is made from AArch32:
> • A Function Identifier is passed in register R0.
> • Arguments are passed in registers R1-R7.
> • Results are returned in R0-R7.
> • The registers R4-R7 must be preserved unless they contain results,
> as specified in the function definition.
> • Registers R8-R14 are saved by the function that is called, and must
> be preserved over the SMC or HVC call.
>
> When an SMC64/HVC64 call is made from AArch64:
> • A Function Identifier is passed in register W0.
> • Arguments are passed in registers X1-X17.
> • Results are returned in X0-X17.
> • Registers X4-X17 must be preserved unless they contain results, as
> specified in the function definition.
> • Registers X18-X30 and stack pointers SP_EL0 and SP_ELx are saved by
> the function that is called, and must be preserved over the SMC or
> HVC call.
From what I saw in both edk2/ and edk2-platforms/ most of code uses
ArmCallSmc() function with ARM_SMC_ARGS structure populared with
arguments. ArmCallSmc[0-3]() are used by Smbios, Psci and QemuSbsa code
only.
Now the question is: how to handle change?
We could add ArmCallSmc[4-17] but that name only tells how many
arguments we pass to SMC call, not how many results we expect. Or should
we add NumberOfResults argument to ArmCallSmc() to know which registers
we should preserve and which are results? And how complicated this
assembly function will become?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#119408): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/119408
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106403741/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-31 7:14 Marcin Juszkiewicz [this message]
2024-06-03 16:47 ` [edk2-devel] ArmCallSmc() and SMCCC specification Leif Lindholm
2024-06-04 12:37 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2024-06-04 13:33 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28f07a88-f664-43f4-871d-b5d0b82c7727@linaro.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox