From: "Michael Kubacki" <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com,
"ayushdevel1325@gmail.com" <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com>,
Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Clarification of Memory management in PEI phase
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 20:10:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <295c8f7e-92bf-a86e-a930-1d5244f4e59a@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR11MB5821EA4532A3A8E2DB551AE2CDB29@MW4PR11MB5821.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
I agree with other comments here. I mainly want to add that if you're
new to PI/UEFI, you might find the following resource helpful for tying
together some pieces from the code and documents like the PI Spec.
https://github.com/tianocore-docs/Docs/raw/master/White_Papers/A_Tour_Beyond_BIOS_Memory_Map_And_Practices_in_UEFI_BIOS_V2.pdf
Thanks,
Michael
On 6/22/2022 6:58 PM, Nate DeSimone wrote:
> Hi Ayush,
>
> For your work to make Rust run in PEI I would recommend writing a
> generic heap manager that uses the PEI services AllocatePage() and
> FreePage(). PEI does allow you to truly free up memory but only when
> allocated in 4KB increments. Your heap manager can allow the Rust
> program to go to a smaller granularity.
>
> In parallel, I can see merit in the argument for adding proper heap
> management to PEI, but that would be a PI specification update that is
> way outside the scope of your GSoC project and won’t happen fast enough
> for the work you need to do this summer 😊.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nate
>
> *From:* devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> *On Behalf Of *Ayush
> Singh
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2022 10:23 PM
> *To:* Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
> *Cc:* devel@edk2.groups.io
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] Clarification of Memory management in PEI phase
>
> Thanks for the wonderful answer.
>
> Ayush Singh
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 9 2022 at 01:26:58 PM -0700, Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com
> <mailto:afish@apple.com>> wrote:
>
> On Jun 9, 2022, at 10:28 AM, Ayush Singh
> <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com <mailto:ayushdevel1325@gmail.com>>
> wrote: Hello everyone, Can anyone help me with understanding
> dynamic memory management in PEI phase? In the UEFI Platform
> Integration Specification, version 1.7 Errata A, Section 4.6,
> PEI Memory services are given which include: 1. InstallPeiMemory()
>
> This is basically: (*PeiServices)->InstallPeiMemory (PeiServices,
> MemoryBegin, MemoryLength); This is how you tell the PEI Core the
> location of the memory that will can be used in PEI.
>
> 2. AllocatePages() 3. AllocatePool() 4. CopyMem() 5. SetMem() 6.
> FreePages() However, no `FreePool()` service seems to be
> present. So how is the memory allocated using `AllocatePool()`
> freed?
>
> It basically gets Freed when you transition to the DXE phase. To
> step back for a minute I think it is important to remember that the
> main job of PEI is to initialize DRAM, and deal with S3 (resuming
> from suspend to RAM). So as soon as you have DRAM you are kind done
> and ready for the DXE IPL so you can load the DXE Phase and start up
> EFI. Remember PEI is Pre EFI. The reality is programming DRAM is
> complex and lots of code got written, then lots more code got
> written and PEI has become large for some ports. That was never the
> intent. PEI is designed as a way to run C code when you code is
> running from ROM and you donā��t have any DRAM. For x86 not having
> DRAM means you are using the cache as RAM. For some SoCs there is
> actually an SRAM you can use. Thus the PEI memory allocation scheme
> is designed to deal with this very constrained environment. You
> start PEI with a heap and stack. You can also allocate HOBs (Hand
> Off Blocks). A pool allocation in PEI is just a HOB. See [1]. There
> is no way to free a HOB. So the AllocatePool() kind of leaks into
> DXE too as an entry in the HOB list. But when the OS called
> gBS->ExitBootServices() that frees all non runtime memory back to
> the OS. If you look a AllocatePages/FreePages you will see
> AllocatePages creates a HOB that points to the memory region, and
> FreePages just marks that HOB as not used. That code is also in this
> file [1]. TL;DR there is no pool manager in PEI. [1]
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdeModulePkg/Core/Pei/Memory/MemoryServices.c#L878
> <https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdeModulePkg/Core/Pei/Memory/MemoryServices.c#L878>
> Thanks, Andrew Fish
>
> Ayush Singh
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-23 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-09 17:28 Clarification of Memory management in PEI phase Ayush Singh
2022-06-09 20:26 ` [edk2-devel] " Andrew Fish
2022-06-10 5:22 ` Ayush Singh
2022-06-22 19:39 ` Brian J. Johnson
2022-06-22 20:54 ` Andrew Fish
2022-06-22 21:41 ` Brian J. Johnson
2022-06-22 21:59 ` vincent zimmer
2022-07-01 17:00 ` FreePool in PEI (was: Clarification of Memory management in PEI phase) Brian J. Johnson
2022-06-22 22:58 ` [edk2-devel] Clarification of Memory management in PEI phase Nate DeSimone
2022-06-23 0:10 ` Michael Kubacki [this message]
2022-06-23 5:30 ` Ayush Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=295c8f7e-92bf-a86e-a930-1d5244f4e59a@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox