From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
To: Andrei Warkentin <awarkentin@vmware.com>,
Andrei Warkentin <andrey.warkentin@gmail.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"pete@akeo.ie" <pete@akeo.ie>
Cc: "leif@nuviainc.com" <leif@nuviainc.com>,
"philmd@redhat.com" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms][PATCH 1/2] RPi: rip out FdtDxe logic to use internal DTB
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 19:04:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29929795-7336-b54f-2a89-e730fc738146@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR05MB34110B58136D06E18E7AED7AB9AB0@BN6PR05MB3411.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
On 5/1/20 6:56 PM, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I added that specific line more as a safeguard in case the depex ever
> changes, as I wasn't comfortable with code that relied on an external
> factor to have defined behavior.
>
> I don't have a strong position on it. If you want it to go, I'll send an
> update.
>
No worries, I'll just drop it from the patch.
> A
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> on behalf of Pete
> Batard via groups.io <pete=akeo.ie@groups.io>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 1, 2020 10:16 AM
> *To:* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>; Andrei Warkentin
> <andrey.warkentin@gmail.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
> *Cc:* leif@nuviainc.com <leif@nuviainc.com>; philmd@redhat.com
> <philmd@redhat.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platforms][PATCH 1/2] RPi: rip out
> FdtDxe logic to use internal DTB
> On 2020.05.01 16:13, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 5/1/20 5:11 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
>>> On 2020.05.01 14:19, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>> On 4/30/20 11:16 PM, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
>>>>> Initially, FdtDxe used an internal (embedded in UEFI) FDT,
>>>>> because it was neither understood how to consume the
>>>>> one loaded by the VideoCore firmware, nor understood just
>>>>> how important it is to use the DTB provided by config.txt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Embedding the DT was a bad idea, because:
>>>>> - Permanently stale
>>>>> - No overlays
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, on devices like the Pi 4 you _have_ to have a DT
>>>>> around for the start4 VPU firmware to pick up, otherwise
>>>>> the board is left in an inconsistent state. So we're being
>>>>> proscriptive now about DT use with config.txt, which means
>>>>> this internal DT logic is deadc code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Further FdtDxe cleanups are possible and will be handled
>>>>> separately, specifically:
>>>>> - probably no need to use a separate allocation for patched DT
>>>>> (optimize memory used)
>>>>> - suspicious use of EfiBootServicesData (I filed
>>>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FARM-software%2Febbr%2Fissues%2F45&data=02%7C01%7Cawarkentin%40vmware.com%7Ccd65ce9968f54b569f8208d7ede2a025%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637239429916614640&sdata=pJ3Wu%2BGJhj%2FqfbBEFMQ9nQ%2B1Pgc%2Bo4Xw0fer2h9ZYvQ%3D&reserved=0
> to sort out the real
>>>>> requirements)
>>>>>
>>>>> Testing: Booted Ubuntu 18.04 on Pi 2B (1.2).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <andrey.warkentin@gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c | 206
>>>>> ++++----------------
>>>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.inf | 4 -
>>>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi3/RPi3.fdf | 11 --
>>>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.fdf | 8 -
>>>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/RaspberryPi.dec | 7 -
>>>>> 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c
>>>>> b/Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c
>>>>> index e7143f57..187b9566 100644
>>>>> --- a/Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c
>>>>> +++ b/Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c
>>>>> @@ -335,90 +335,6 @@ CleanSimpleFramebuffer (
>>>>> return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>>>> }
>>>>> -#define MAX_CMDLINE_SIZE 512
>>>>> -
>>>>> -STATIC
>>>>> -EFI_STATUS
>>>>> -UpdateBootArgs (
>>>>> - VOID
>>>>> - )
>>>>> -{
>>>>> - INTN Node;
>>>>> - INTN Retval;
>>>>> - EFI_STATUS Status;
>>>>> - CHAR8 *CommandLine;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - //
>>>>> - // Locate the /chosen node
>>>>> - //
>>>>> - Node = fdt_path_offset (mFdtImage, "/chosen");
>>>>> - if (Node < 0) {
>>>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to locate /chosen node\n",
>>>>> __FUNCTION__));
>>>>> - return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - //
>>>>> - // If /chosen/bootargs already exists, we want to add a space
>>>>> character
>>>>> - // before adding the firmware supplied arguments. However, the
>>>>> RpiFirmware
>>>>> - // protocol expects a 32-bit aligned buffer. So let's allocate 4
>>>>> bytes of
>>>>> - // slack, and skip the first 3 when passing this buffer into libfdt.
>>>>> - //
>>>>> - CommandLine = AllocatePool (MAX_CMDLINE_SIZE) + 4;
>>>>> - if (!CommandLine) {
>>>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to allocate memory\n",
>>>>> __FUNCTION__));
>>>>> - return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - //
>>>>> - // Get the command line from the firmware
>>>>> - //
>>>>> - Status = mFwProtocol->GetCommandLine (MAX_CMDLINE_SIZE,
>>>>> CommandLine + 4);
>>>>> - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to retrieve command line\n",
>>>>> __FUNCTION__));
>>>>> - return Status;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (AsciiStrLen (CommandLine + 4) == 0) {
>>>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: empty command line received\n",
>>>>> __FUNCTION__));
>>>>> - return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - CommandLine[3] = ' ';
>>>>> -
>>>>> - Retval = fdt_appendprop_string (mFdtImage, Node, "bootargs",
>>>>> &CommandLine[3]);
>>>>> - if (Retval != 0) {
>>>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to set /chosen/bootargs
>>>>> property (%d)\n",
>>>>> - __FUNCTION__, Retval));
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - DEBUG_CODE_BEGIN ();
>>>>> - CONST CHAR8 *Prop;
>>>>> - INT32 Length;
>>>>> - INT32 Index;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - Node = fdt_path_offset (mFdtImage, "/chosen");
>>>>> - ASSERT (Node >= 0);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - Prop = fdt_getprop (mFdtImage, Node, "bootargs", &Length);
>>>>> - ASSERT (Prop != NULL);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "Command line set from firmware (length
>>>>> %d):\n'", Length));
>>>>> -
>>>>> - for (Index = 0; Index < Length; Index++, Prop++) {
>>>>> - if (*Prop == '\0') {
>>>>> - continue;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%c", *Prop));
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "'\n"));
>>>>> - DEBUG_CODE_END ();
>>>>> -
>>>>> - FreePool (CommandLine - 4);
>>>>> - return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>>>> -}
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> /**
>>>>> @param ImageHandle of the loaded driver
>>>>> @param SystemTable Pointer to the System Table
>>>>> @@ -435,13 +351,10 @@ FdtDxeInitialize (
>>>>> IN EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable
>>>>> )
>>>>> {
>>>>> + INT32 Retval;
>>>>> EFI_STATUS Status;
>>>>> - EFI_GUID *FdtGuid;
>>>>> - VOID *FdtImage;
>>>>> UINTN FdtSize;
>>>>> - INT32 Retval;
>>>>> - UINT32 BoardRevision;
>>>>> - BOOLEAN Internal;
>>>>> + VOID *FdtImage = NULL;
>>>>> if (PcdGet32 (PcdOptDeviceTree) == 0) {
>>>>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "Device Tree disabled per user
>>>>> configuration\n"));
>>>>> @@ -450,77 +363,28 @@ FdtDxeInitialize (
>>>>> Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gRaspberryPiFirmwareProtocolGuid,
>>>>> NULL,
>>>>> (VOID**)&mFwProtocol);
>>>>> - ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>>>> + if (mFwProtocol == NULL) {
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Impossible because of the depex...
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>>>> + return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> Do we need this change?
>>>
>>> Looking at what we are doing elsewhere, I thing we should go with:
>>>
>>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> return Status;
>>> }
>>>
>>> The ASSERT_EFI_ERROR () on its own was not enough for RELEASE, so we
>>> definitely want to return an error code here if needed, and I guess
>>> that, technically, we could consider that LocateProtocol () may
>>> succeed and return a NULL value for mFwProtocol, but I doubt that's a
>>> valid consideration.
>>>
>>
>> But the DEPEX guarantees that the module will only be dispatched at a
>> time when LocateProtocol() will succeed. This is a common pattern, so I
>> wonder why it is being silently modified here.
>>
>
> Fair enough. Let's wait for Andrei to reply on this.
>
> /Pete
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-01 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-30 21:16 [edk2-platforms][PATCH 0/2] Rip out "internal DTB" support in FdtDxe Andrei Warkentin
2020-04-30 21:16 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH 1/2] RPi: rip out FdtDxe logic to use internal DTB Andrei Warkentin
2020-05-01 10:45 ` Pete Batard
2020-05-01 13:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-01 15:11 ` Pete Batard
2020-05-01 15:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-01 15:16 ` Pete Batard
2020-05-01 16:56 ` [edk2-devel] " Andrei Warkentin
2020-05-01 17:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-04-30 21:16 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH 2/2] RPi: remove any mention of an "internal DTB" Andrei Warkentin
2020-05-01 10:47 ` Pete Batard
2020-05-01 17:08 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH 0/2] Rip out "internal DTB" support in FdtDxe Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29929795-7336-b54f-2a89-e730fc738146@arm.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox