Re: [PATCH v6 00/17] x86: Secure Encrypted Virtualization (AMD)

[Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>]

Hi Jordan and Andrew,

On 07/07/2017 12:28 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2017-07-06 14:49:44, Duran, Leo wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: afish@apple.com [mailto:afish@apple.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 4:46 PM
>>>
>>>> On Jul 6, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2017-07-06 13:11:03, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 07/06/2017 11:45 AM, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am asking that you file and own a bugzilla for this. You'd obviously
>>>> need to work with the package owners though. Unless you drive this, I
>>>> don't think anyone will be motivated enough to get it fixed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If some one will make a write up on this mailing list summarizing the issue
>>> with the GCD design, and what features are needed I can start a
>>> conversation on the PI working group list.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andrew Fish
>> [Duran, Leo]
>> Excellent proposal, thanks!
>>
>> How about we do that on a separate thread (maybe with a reference back to this one, if needed for context)?
>> Basically, we would like these patch-set to move upstream independent of the GCD write-up.
> 
> This sounds reasonable, but can you file the bugzilla ticket? I think
> it would be fine to add more details to the bugzilla later.
> 
> It sounds like it'd be good to note in the ticker that it may require
> discussion in the PIWG.
> 
> If you document what is needed in the bugzilla, then maybe Andrew can
> pull the information from there.
> 

I have created a bugzilla [1]. I have tried to give some background on what we are trying to do.
Lets take the GCD framework discussion on bugzilla (or separate thread).

[1] https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=623


> -Jordan
>