From: "Sami Mujawar" <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, rebecca@nuviainc.com,
Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] MdeModulePkg: Add MpServicesTest application to exercise MP Services
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:54:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c02b1f0-377f-4c4f-5b9b-cfd80f6a9058@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210920154732.10181-2-rebecca@nuviainc.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 15750 bytes --]
Hi Rebecca,
Apologies, I missed reviewing this patch.
Please find my feedback inline marked [SAMI].
Regards,
Sami Mujawar
On 20/09/2021 04:47 PM, Rebecca Cran via groups.io wrote:
Add a new MpServicesTest application under MdeModulePkg/Application that
exercises the EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@nuviainc.com><mailto:rebecca@nuviainc.com>
---
MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.c | 433 ++++++++++++++++++++
MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf | 38 ++
MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc | 2 +
3 files changed, 473 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.c b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4eb06e6b7cbd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.c
@@ -0,0 +1,433 @@
+/** @file
+
+ Copyright (c) 2021, NUVIA Inc. All rights reserved.<BR>
+ SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
+**/
+
+#include <Uefi.h>
+#include <Library/DebugLib.h>
+#include <Library/RngLib.h>
+#include <Library/UefiBootServicesTableLib.h>
+#include <Library/UefiLib.h>
+#include <Pi/PiMultiPhase.h>
+#include <Protocol/MpService.h>
+
+#define MAX_RANDOM_PROCESSOR_RETRIES 10
+
+#define AP_STARTUP_TEST_TIMEOUT_US 50000
+#define INFINITE_TIMEOUT 0
+
+#define RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR(x) \
+ if (EFI_ERROR (x)) { \
+ Print (L"failed: %r\n", x); \
+ return; \
+ } \
+ else { \
+ Print (L"done.\n"); \
+ }
+
+/** The procedure to run with the MP Services interface.
+
+ @param Buffer The procedure argument.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+EFIAPI
+ApFunction (
+ IN OUT VOID *Buffer
+ )
+{
+}
+
+/** Displays information returned from MP Services Protocol.
+
+ @param Mp The MP Services Protocol
+
+ @return The number of CPUs in the system.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+UINTN
+PrintProcessorInformation (
+ IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp
+ )
+{
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ EFI_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION CpuInfo;
+ UINTN Index;
+ UINTN NumCpu;
+ UINTN NumEnabledCpu;
+
+ Status = Mp->GetNumberOfProcessors (Mp, &NumCpu, &NumEnabledCpu);
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ Print (L"GetNumberOfProcessors failed: %r\n", Status);
+ } else {
+ Print (L"Number of CPUs: %ld, Enabled: %d\n", NumCpu, NumEnabledCpu);
+ }
+
+ for (Index = 0; Index < NumCpu; Index++) {
+ Status = Mp->GetProcessorInfo (Mp, CPU_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY | Index, &CpuInfo);
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ Print (L"GetProcessorInfo for Processor %d failed: %r\n", Index, Status);
+ } else {
+ Print (
+ L"Processor %d:\n"
+ L"\tID: %016lx\n"
+ L"\tStatus: %s | ",
+ Index,
+ CpuInfo.ProcessorId,
+ (CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_AS_BSP_BIT) ? L"BSP" : L"AP"
+ );
+
+ Print (L"%s | ", (CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) ? L"Enabled" : L"Disabled");
+ Print (L"%s\n", (CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_HEALTH_STATUS_BIT) ? L"Healthy" : L"Faulted");
+
+ Print (
+ L"\tLocation: Package %d, Core %d, Thread %d\n"
+ L"\tExtended Information: Package %d, Module %d, Tile %d, Die %d, Core %d, Thread %d\n\n",
+ CpuInfo.Location.Package,
+ CpuInfo.Location.Core,
+ CpuInfo.Location.Thread,
+ CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Package,
+ CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Module,
+ CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Tile,
+ CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Die,
+ CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Core,
+ CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Thread
+ );
+ }
+ }
+
+ return NumCpu;
+}
+
+/** Returns the index of an enabled AP selected at random.
+
+ @param Mp The MP Services Protocol.
+ @param ProcessorIndex The index of a random enabled AP.
+
+ @retval EFI_SUCCESS An enabled processor was found and returned.
+ @retval EFI_NOT_FOUND A processor was unable to be selected.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+EFI_STATUS
+GetRandomEnabledProcessorIndex (
+ IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp,
+ OUT UINTN *ProcessorIndex
+ )
+{
+ UINTN Index;
+ UINTN IndexOfEnabledCpu;
+ UINTN NumCpus;
+ UINTN NumEnabledCpus;
+ UINTN IndexOfEnabledCpuToUse;
+ UINT16 RandomNumber;
+ BOOLEAN Success;
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ EFI_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION CpuInfo;
+
+ IndexOfEnabledCpu = 0;
+
+ Success = GetRandomNumber16 (&RandomNumber);
+ ASSERT (Success == TRUE);
+
+ Status = Mp->GetNumberOfProcessors (Mp, &NumCpus, &NumEnabledCpus);
+ ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+
+ if (NumEnabledCpus == 1) {
+ Print (L"All APs are disabled\n");
+ return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
+ }
+
+ IndexOfEnabledCpuToUse = RandomNumber % NumEnabledCpus;
+
+ for (Index = 0; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+ Status = Mp->GetProcessorInfo (Mp, Index, &CpuInfo);
+ ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+ if ((CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) &&
+ !(CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_AS_BSP_BIT)) {
+ if (IndexOfEnabledCpuToUse == IndexOfEnabledCpu) {
+ *ProcessorIndex = Index;
+ Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
+ break;
[SAMI] Minor. I think it should be possible to return from here. In that case the check below if (Index == NumCpus) is not needed and EFI_NOT_FOUND can be returned at the end of the function.
+ }
+
+ IndexOfEnabledCpu++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (Index == NumCpus) {
+ Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
+ }
+
+ return Status;
+}
+
+/** Tests for the StartupThisAP function.
+
+ @param Mp The MP Services Protocol.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+StartupThisApTests (
+ IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp
+ )
+{
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ UINTN ProcessorIndex;
+ UINT32 Retries;
+
+ Retries = 0;
+
+ do {
+ Status = GetRandomEnabledProcessorIndex (Mp, &ProcessorIndex);
+ } while (EFI_ERROR (Status) && Retries++ < MAX_RANDOM_PROCESSOR_RETRIES);
+
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ Print (
+ L"StartupThisAP on Processor %d with 0 (infinite) timeout...",
+ ProcessorIndex
+ );
+
+ Status = Mp->StartupThisAP (
+ Mp,
+ ApFunction,
+ ProcessorIndex,
+ NULL,
+ INFINITE_TIMEOUT,
+ NULL,
+ NULL
+ );
[SAMI] Please align the above code.
+
+ RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
[SAMI] I can see that the RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR() macro is avoiding repetitive code. But I am concerned that the return statement in the macro is hiding the program flow.
+
+ Retries = 0;
+
+ do {
+ Status = GetRandomEnabledProcessorIndex (Mp, &ProcessorIndex);
+ } while (EFI_ERROR (Status) && Retries++ < MAX_RANDOM_PROCESSOR_RETRIES);
+
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ Print (
+ L"StartupThisAP on Processor %d with %dms timeout...",
+ ProcessorIndex,
+ AP_STARTUP_TEST_TIMEOUT_US / 1000
+ );
+ Status = Mp->StartupThisAP (
+ Mp,
+ ApFunction,
+ ProcessorIndex,
+ NULL,
+ AP_STARTUP_TEST_TIMEOUT_US,
+ NULL,
+ NULL
+ );
+ RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+}
+
+/** Tests for the StartupAllAPs function.
+
+ @param Mp The MP Services Protocol.
+ @param NumCpus The number of CPUs in the system.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+StartupAllAPsTests (
+ IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp,
+ IN UINTN NumCpus
+ )
+{
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ UINTN Timeout;
+
+ Print (L"Running with SingleThread FALSE, 0 (infinite) timeout...");
+ Status = Mp->StartupAllAPs (Mp, ApFunction, FALSE, NULL, INFINITE_TIMEOUT, NULL, NULL);
+ RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+
+ Timeout = NumCpus * AP_STARTUP_TEST_TIMEOUT_US;
+
+ Print (L"Running with SingleThread TRUE, %dms timeout...", Timeout / 1000);
+ Status = Mp->StartupAllAPs (
+ Mp,
+ ApFunction,
+ TRUE,
+ NULL,
+ Timeout,
+ NULL,
+ NULL
+ );
+ RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+}
+
+/** Tests for the EnableDisableAP function.
+
+ @param Mp The MP Services Protocol.
+ @param NumCpus The number of CPUs in the system.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+EnableDisableAPTests (
+ IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp,
+ IN UINTN NumCpus
+ )
+{
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ UINTN Index;
+ UINT32 HealthFlag;
+
+ HealthFlag = 0;
+
+ for (Index = 1; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+ Print (L"Disabling Processor %d with HealthFlag faulted...", Index);
+ Status = Mp->EnableDisableAP (Mp, Index, FALSE, &HealthFlag);
+ RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+ }
+
+ HealthFlag = PROCESSOR_HEALTH_STATUS_BIT;
+
+ for (Index = 1; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+ Print (L"Enabling Processor %d with HealthFlag healthy...", Index);
+ Status = Mp->EnableDisableAP (Mp, Index, TRUE, &HealthFlag);
+ RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+ }
+}
+
+/** Tests for the SwitchBSP function.
+
+ @param Mp The MP Services Protocol.
+ @param NumCpus The number of CPUs in the system.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+SwitchBSPTests (
+ IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp,
+ IN UINTN NumCpus
+ )
+{
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ UINTN Index;
+
+ for (Index = 1; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+ Print (L"Switching BSP to Processor %d with EnableOldBSP FALSE...", Index);
+ Status = Mp->SwitchBSP (Mp, Index, FALSE);
[SAMI] The SwitchBsp call can only be performed by the current BSP. So, I am not sure if this would work in a for loop.
+ RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+ }
+
+ for (Index = 0; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+ Print (L"Switching BSP to Processor %d with EnableOldBSP TRUE...", Index);
+ Status = Mp->SwitchBSP (Mp, Index, TRUE);
+ RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ The user Entry Point for Application. The user code starts with this function
+ as the real entry point for the application.
+
+ @param[in] ImageHandle The firmware allocated handle for the EFI image.
+ @param[in] SystemTable A pointer to the EFI System Table.
+
+ @retval EFI_SUCCESS The entry point is executed successfully.
+ @retval other Some error occurs when executing this entry point.
+
+**/
+EFI_STATUS
+EFIAPI
+UefiMain (
+ IN EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle,
+ IN EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable
+ )
+{
+ EFI_STATUS Status;
+ EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp;
+ EFI_HANDLE *pHandle;
+ UINTN HandleCount;
+ UINTN BspId;
+ UINTN NumCpus;
+ UINTN Index;
+
+ pHandle = NULL;
+ HandleCount = 0;
+ BspId = 0;
+
+ Status = gBS->LocateHandleBuffer (
+ ByProtocol,
+ &gEfiMpServiceProtocolGuid,
+ NULL,
+ &HandleCount,
+ &pHandle
+ );
+
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ Print (L"Failed to locate EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL (%r). Not installed on platform?\n", Status);
+ return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
+ }
+
+ for (Index = 0; Index < HandleCount; Index++) {
+ Status = gBS->OpenProtocol (
+ *pHandle,
+ &gEfiMpServiceProtocolGuid,
+ (VOID **)&Mp,
+ NULL,
+ gImageHandle,
+ EFI_OPEN_PROTOCOL_GET_PROTOCOL
+ );
+
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ return Status;
+ }
+
+ pHandle++;
+ }
+
+ Print (L"Exercising WhoAmI\n\n");
+ Status = Mp->WhoAmI (Mp, &BspId);
+ if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ Print (L"WhoAmI failed: %r\n", Status);
+ return Status;
+ } else {
+ Print (L"WhoAmI: %016lx\n", BspId);
+ }
+
+ Print (L"\n");
+ Print (
+ L"Exercising GetNumberOfProcessors and GetProcessorInformation with "
+ L"CPU_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY\n\n"
+ );
+ NumCpus = PrintProcessorInformation (Mp);
+ if (NumCpus < 2) {
+ Print (L"UP system found. Not running further tests.\n");
+ return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+ }
+
+ Print (L"\n");
+ Print (L"Exercising StartupThisAP:\n\n");
+ StartupThisApTests (Mp);
+
+ Print (L"\n");
+ Print (L"Exercising StartupAllAPs:\n\n");
+ StartupAllAPsTests (Mp, NumCpus);
+
+ Print (L"\n");
+ Print (L"Exercising EnableDisableAP:\n\n");
+ EnableDisableAPTests (Mp, NumCpus);
+
+ Print (L"\n");
+ Print (L"Exercising SwitchBSP\n\n");
+ SwitchBSPTests (Mp, NumCpus);
+
+ gBS->CloseProtocol (pHandle, &gEfiMpServiceProtocolGuid, gImageHandle, NULL);
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+}
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8a21ca70d8fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+## @file
+# UEFI Application to exercise EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL.
+#
+# Copyright (c) 2021, NUVIA Inc. All rights reserved.<BR>
+#
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
+#
+##
+
+[Defines]
+ INF_VERSION = 1.29
+ BASE_NAME = MpServicesTest
+ FILE_GUID = 43e9defa-7209-4b0d-b136-cc4ca02cb469
+ MODULE_TYPE = UEFI_APPLICATION
+ VERSION_STRING = 0.1
+ ENTRY_POINT = UefiMain
+
+#
+# The following information is for reference only and not required by the build tools.
+#
+# VALID_ARCHITECTURES = IA32 X64 AARCH64
+#
+
+[Sources]
+ MpServicesTest.c
+
+[Packages]
+ MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
+
+[LibraryClasses]
+ BaseLib
+ RngLib
+ UefiApplicationEntryPoint
+ UefiLib
+
+[Protocols]
+ gEfiMpServiceProtocolGuid ## CONSUMES
+
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc
index b1d83461865e..1cf5ccd30d40 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc
@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@
MemoryAllocationLib|MdePkg/Library/UefiMemoryAllocationLib/UefiMemoryAllocationLib.inf
DebugLib|MdePkg/Library/UefiDebugLibStdErr/UefiDebugLibStdErr.inf
FileHandleLib|MdePkg/Library/UefiFileHandleLib/UefiFileHandleLib.inf
+ RngLib|MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.inf
[LibraryClasses.common.MM_STANDALONE]
HobLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/BaseHobLibNull/BaseHobLibNull.inf
@@ -215,6 +216,7 @@
MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.inf
MdeModulePkg/Application/DumpDynPcd/DumpDynPcd.inf
MdeModulePkg/Application/MemoryProfileInfo/MemoryProfileInfo.inf
+ MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf
MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiSortLib/UefiSortLib.inf
MdeModulePkg/Logo/Logo.inf
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 17322 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-03 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-20 15:47 [PATCH v2 0/1] MdeModulePkg: Add MpServicesTest.efi to exercise EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL Rebecca Cran
2021-09-20 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] MdeModulePkg: Add MpServicesTest application to exercise MP Services Rebecca Cran
2021-11-03 10:54 ` Sami Mujawar [this message]
2021-11-03 17:22 ` [edk2-devel] " Rebecca Cran
[not found] ` <16A69264F30D2680.28782@groups.io>
2021-10-16 6:32 ` Rebecca Cran
2021-10-16 6:54 ` Sami Mujawar
2021-11-03 2:31 ` Rebecca Cran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c02b1f0-377f-4c4f-5b9b-cfd80f6a9058@arm.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox