public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sami Mujawar" <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, rebecca@nuviainc.com,
	Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
	Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] MdeModulePkg: Add MpServicesTest application to exercise MP Services
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:54:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c02b1f0-377f-4c4f-5b9b-cfd80f6a9058@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210920154732.10181-2-rebecca@nuviainc.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 15750 bytes --]

Hi Rebecca,

Apologies, I missed reviewing this patch.

Please find my feedback inline marked [SAMI].

Regards,

Sami Mujawar

On 20/09/2021 04:47 PM, Rebecca Cran via groups.io wrote:

Add a new MpServicesTest application under MdeModulePkg/Application that
exercises the EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL.

Signed-off-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@nuviainc.com><mailto:rebecca@nuviainc.com>
---
 MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.c   | 433 ++++++++++++++++++++
 MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf |  38 ++
 MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc                              |   2 +
 3 files changed, 473 insertions(+)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.c b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4eb06e6b7cbd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.c
@@ -0,0 +1,433 @@
+/** @file
+
+    Copyright (c) 2021, NUVIA Inc. All rights reserved.<BR>
+    SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
+**/
+
+#include <Uefi.h>
+#include <Library/DebugLib.h>
+#include <Library/RngLib.h>
+#include <Library/UefiBootServicesTableLib.h>
+#include <Library/UefiLib.h>
+#include <Pi/PiMultiPhase.h>
+#include <Protocol/MpService.h>
+
+#define MAX_RANDOM_PROCESSOR_RETRIES 10
+
+#define AP_STARTUP_TEST_TIMEOUT_US  50000
+#define INFINITE_TIMEOUT            0
+
+#define RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR(x)   \
+  if (EFI_ERROR (x)) {           \
+    Print (L"failed: %r\n", x);  \
+    return;                      \
+  }                              \
+  else {                         \
+    Print (L"done.\n");          \
+  }
+
+/** The procedure to run with the MP Services interface.
+
+  @param Buffer The procedure argument.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+EFIAPI
+ApFunction (
+  IN OUT VOID *Buffer
+  )
+{
+}
+
+/** Displays information returned from MP Services Protocol.
+
+  @param Mp  The MP Services Protocol
+
+  @return The number of CPUs in the system.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+UINTN
+PrintProcessorInformation (
+  IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp
+  )
+{
+  EFI_STATUS                 Status;
+  EFI_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION  CpuInfo;
+  UINTN                      Index;
+  UINTN                      NumCpu;
+  UINTN                      NumEnabledCpu;
+
+  Status = Mp->GetNumberOfProcessors (Mp, &NumCpu, &NumEnabledCpu);
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+    Print (L"GetNumberOfProcessors failed: %r\n", Status);
+  } else {
+    Print (L"Number of CPUs: %ld, Enabled: %d\n", NumCpu, NumEnabledCpu);
+  }
+
+  for (Index = 0; Index < NumCpu; Index++) {
+    Status = Mp->GetProcessorInfo (Mp, CPU_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY | Index, &CpuInfo);
+    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+      Print (L"GetProcessorInfo for Processor %d failed: %r\n", Index, Status);
+    } else {
+      Print (
+        L"Processor %d:\n"
+        L"\tID: %016lx\n"
+        L"\tStatus: %s | ",
+        Index,
+        CpuInfo.ProcessorId,
+        (CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_AS_BSP_BIT) ? L"BSP" : L"AP"
+        );
+
+      Print (L"%s | ", (CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) ? L"Enabled" : L"Disabled");
+      Print (L"%s\n", (CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_HEALTH_STATUS_BIT) ? L"Healthy" : L"Faulted");
+
+      Print (
+        L"\tLocation: Package %d, Core %d, Thread %d\n"
+        L"\tExtended Information: Package %d, Module %d, Tile %d, Die %d, Core %d, Thread %d\n\n",
+        CpuInfo.Location.Package,
+        CpuInfo.Location.Core,
+        CpuInfo.Location.Thread,
+        CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Package,
+        CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Module,
+        CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Tile,
+        CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Die,
+        CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Core,
+        CpuInfo.ExtendedInformation.Location2.Thread
+        );
+    }
+  }
+
+  return NumCpu;
+}
+
+/** Returns the index of an enabled AP selected at random.
+
+  @param Mp             The MP Services Protocol.
+  @param ProcessorIndex The index of a random enabled AP.
+
+  @retval EFI_SUCCESS   An enabled processor was found and returned.
+  @retval EFI_NOT_FOUND A processor was unable to be selected.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+EFI_STATUS
+GetRandomEnabledProcessorIndex (
+  IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp,
+  OUT UINTN *ProcessorIndex
+  )
+{
+  UINTN                      Index;
+  UINTN                      IndexOfEnabledCpu;
+  UINTN                      NumCpus;
+  UINTN                      NumEnabledCpus;
+  UINTN                      IndexOfEnabledCpuToUse;
+  UINT16                     RandomNumber;
+  BOOLEAN                    Success;
+  EFI_STATUS                 Status;
+  EFI_PROCESSOR_INFORMATION  CpuInfo;
+
+  IndexOfEnabledCpu = 0;
+
+  Success = GetRandomNumber16 (&RandomNumber);
+  ASSERT (Success == TRUE);
+
+  Status = Mp->GetNumberOfProcessors (Mp, &NumCpus, &NumEnabledCpus);
+  ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+
+  if (NumEnabledCpus == 1) {
+    Print (L"All APs are disabled\n");
+    return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
+  }
+
+  IndexOfEnabledCpuToUse = RandomNumber % NumEnabledCpus;
+
+  for (Index = 0; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+    Status = Mp->GetProcessorInfo (Mp, Index, &CpuInfo);
+    ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+    if ((CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_ENABLED_BIT) &&
+        !(CpuInfo.StatusFlag & PROCESSOR_AS_BSP_BIT)) {
+      if (IndexOfEnabledCpuToUse == IndexOfEnabledCpu) {
+        *ProcessorIndex = Index;
+        Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
+        break;

[SAMI] Minor. I think it should be possible to return from here. In that case the check below if (Index == NumCpus) is not needed and EFI_NOT_FOUND can be returned at the end of the function.


+      }
+
+      IndexOfEnabledCpu++;
+    }
+  }
+
+  if (Index == NumCpus) {
+    Status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
+  }
+
+  return Status;
+}
+
+/** Tests for the StartupThisAP function.
+
+  @param Mp The MP Services Protocol.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+StartupThisApTests (
+  IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp
+  )
+{
+  EFI_STATUS  Status;
+  UINTN       ProcessorIndex;
+  UINT32      Retries;
+
+  Retries = 0;
+
+  do {
+    Status = GetRandomEnabledProcessorIndex (Mp, &ProcessorIndex);
+  } while (EFI_ERROR (Status) && Retries++ < MAX_RANDOM_PROCESSOR_RETRIES);
+
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+    return;
+  }
+
+  Print (
+    L"StartupThisAP on Processor %d with 0 (infinite) timeout...",
+    ProcessorIndex
+    );
+
+  Status = Mp->StartupThisAP (
+    Mp,
+    ApFunction,
+    ProcessorIndex,
+    NULL,
+    INFINITE_TIMEOUT,
+    NULL,
+    NULL
+    );

[SAMI] Please align the above code.


+
+  RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);

[SAMI] I can see that the RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR() macro is avoiding repetitive code. But I am concerned that the return statement in the macro is hiding the program flow.


+
+  Retries = 0;
+
+  do {
+    Status = GetRandomEnabledProcessorIndex (Mp, &ProcessorIndex);
+  } while (EFI_ERROR (Status) && Retries++ < MAX_RANDOM_PROCESSOR_RETRIES);
+
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+    return;
+  }
+
+  Print (
+    L"StartupThisAP on Processor %d with %dms timeout...",
+    ProcessorIndex,
+    AP_STARTUP_TEST_TIMEOUT_US / 1000
+    );
+  Status = Mp->StartupThisAP (
+                 Mp,
+                 ApFunction,
+                 ProcessorIndex,
+                 NULL,
+                 AP_STARTUP_TEST_TIMEOUT_US,
+                 NULL,
+                 NULL
+                 );
+  RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+}
+
+/** Tests for the StartupAllAPs function.
+
+  @param Mp      The MP Services Protocol.
+  @param NumCpus The number of CPUs in the system.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+StartupAllAPsTests (
+  IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp,
+  IN UINTN NumCpus
+  )
+{
+  EFI_STATUS  Status;
+  UINTN       Timeout;
+
+  Print (L"Running with SingleThread FALSE, 0 (infinite) timeout...");
+  Status = Mp->StartupAllAPs (Mp, ApFunction, FALSE, NULL, INFINITE_TIMEOUT, NULL, NULL);
+  RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+
+  Timeout = NumCpus * AP_STARTUP_TEST_TIMEOUT_US;
+
+  Print (L"Running with SingleThread TRUE, %dms timeout...", Timeout / 1000);
+  Status = Mp->StartupAllAPs (
+                 Mp,
+                 ApFunction,
+                 TRUE,
+                 NULL,
+                 Timeout,
+                 NULL,
+                 NULL
+                 );
+  RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+}
+
+/** Tests for the EnableDisableAP function.
+
+  @param Mp      The MP Services Protocol.
+  @param NumCpus The number of CPUs in the system.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+EnableDisableAPTests (
+  IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp,
+  IN UINTN                    NumCpus
+  )
+{
+  EFI_STATUS  Status;
+  UINTN       Index;
+  UINT32      HealthFlag;
+
+  HealthFlag = 0;
+
+  for (Index = 1; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+    Print (L"Disabling Processor %d with HealthFlag faulted...", Index);
+    Status = Mp->EnableDisableAP (Mp, Index, FALSE, &HealthFlag);
+    RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+  }
+
+  HealthFlag = PROCESSOR_HEALTH_STATUS_BIT;
+
+  for (Index = 1; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+    Print (L"Enabling Processor %d with HealthFlag healthy...", Index);
+    Status = Mp->EnableDisableAP (Mp, Index, TRUE, &HealthFlag);
+    RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+  }
+}
+
+/** Tests for the SwitchBSP function.
+
+  @param Mp      The MP Services Protocol.
+  @param NumCpus The number of CPUs in the system.
+
+**/
+STATIC
+VOID
+SwitchBSPTests (
+  IN EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL *Mp,
+  IN UINTN                    NumCpus
+  )
+{
+  EFI_STATUS  Status;
+  UINTN       Index;
+
+  for (Index = 1; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+    Print (L"Switching BSP to Processor %d with EnableOldBSP FALSE...", Index);
+    Status = Mp->SwitchBSP (Mp, Index, FALSE);

[SAMI] The SwitchBsp call can only be performed by the current BSP. So, I am not sure if this would work in a for loop.


+    RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+  }
+
+  for (Index = 0; Index < NumCpus; Index++) {
+    Print (L"Switching BSP to Processor %d with EnableOldBSP TRUE...", Index);
+    Status = Mp->SwitchBSP (Mp, Index, TRUE);
+    RETURN_IF_EFI_ERROR (Status);
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+  The user Entry Point for Application. The user code starts with this function
+  as the real entry point for the application.
+
+  @param[in] ImageHandle    The firmware allocated handle for the EFI image.
+  @param[in] SystemTable    A pointer to the EFI System Table.
+
+  @retval EFI_SUCCESS       The entry point is executed successfully.
+  @retval other             Some error occurs when executing this entry point.
+
+**/
+EFI_STATUS
+EFIAPI
+UefiMain (
+  IN EFI_HANDLE        ImageHandle,
+  IN EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE  *SystemTable
+  )
+{
+  EFI_STATUS                Status;
+  EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL  *Mp;
+  EFI_HANDLE                *pHandle;
+  UINTN                     HandleCount;
+  UINTN                     BspId;
+  UINTN                     NumCpus;
+  UINTN                     Index;
+
+  pHandle     = NULL;
+  HandleCount = 0;
+  BspId = 0;
+
+  Status = gBS->LocateHandleBuffer (
+                  ByProtocol,
+                  &gEfiMpServiceProtocolGuid,
+                  NULL,
+                  &HandleCount,
+                  &pHandle
+                  );
+
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+    Print (L"Failed to locate EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL (%r). Not installed on platform?\n", Status);
+    return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
+  }
+
+  for (Index = 0; Index < HandleCount; Index++) {
+    Status = gBS->OpenProtocol (
+                    *pHandle,
+                    &gEfiMpServiceProtocolGuid,
+                    (VOID **)&Mp,
+                    NULL,
+                    gImageHandle,
+                    EFI_OPEN_PROTOCOL_GET_PROTOCOL
+                    );
+
+    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+      return Status;
+    }
+
+    pHandle++;
+  }
+
+  Print (L"Exercising WhoAmI\n\n");
+  Status = Mp->WhoAmI (Mp, &BspId);
+  if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+    Print (L"WhoAmI failed: %r\n", Status);
+    return Status;
+  } else {
+    Print (L"WhoAmI: %016lx\n", BspId);
+  }
+
+  Print (L"\n");
+  Print (
+    L"Exercising GetNumberOfProcessors and GetProcessorInformation with "
+    L"CPU_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY\n\n"
+    );
+  NumCpus = PrintProcessorInformation (Mp);
+  if (NumCpus < 2) {
+    Print (L"UP system found. Not running further tests.\n");
+    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+  }
+
+  Print (L"\n");
+  Print (L"Exercising StartupThisAP:\n\n");
+  StartupThisApTests (Mp);
+
+  Print (L"\n");
+  Print (L"Exercising StartupAllAPs:\n\n");
+  StartupAllAPsTests (Mp, NumCpus);
+
+  Print (L"\n");
+  Print (L"Exercising EnableDisableAP:\n\n");
+  EnableDisableAPTests (Mp, NumCpus);
+
+  Print (L"\n");
+  Print (L"Exercising SwitchBSP\n\n");
+  SwitchBSPTests (Mp, NumCpus);
+
+  gBS->CloseProtocol (pHandle, &gEfiMpServiceProtocolGuid, gImageHandle, NULL);
+  return EFI_SUCCESS;
+}
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8a21ca70d8fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+## @file
+#  UEFI Application to exercise EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL.
+#
+#  Copyright (c) 2021, NUVIA Inc. All rights reserved.<BR>
+#
+#  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
+#
+##
+
+[Defines]
+  INF_VERSION                    = 1.29
+  BASE_NAME                      = MpServicesTest
+  FILE_GUID                      = 43e9defa-7209-4b0d-b136-cc4ca02cb469
+  MODULE_TYPE                    = UEFI_APPLICATION
+  VERSION_STRING                 = 0.1
+  ENTRY_POINT                    = UefiMain
+
+#
+# The following information is for reference only and not required by the build tools.
+#
+#  VALID_ARCHITECTURES           = IA32 X64 AARCH64
+#
+
+[Sources]
+  MpServicesTest.c
+
+[Packages]
+  MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
+
+[LibraryClasses]
+  BaseLib
+  RngLib
+  UefiApplicationEntryPoint
+  UefiLib
+
+[Protocols]
+  gEfiMpServiceProtocolGuid    ## CONSUMES
+
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc
index b1d83461865e..1cf5ccd30d40 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dsc
@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@
   MemoryAllocationLib|MdePkg/Library/UefiMemoryAllocationLib/UefiMemoryAllocationLib.inf
   DebugLib|MdePkg/Library/UefiDebugLibStdErr/UefiDebugLibStdErr.inf
   FileHandleLib|MdePkg/Library/UefiFileHandleLib/UefiFileHandleLib.inf
+  RngLib|MdePkg/Library/DxeRngLib/DxeRngLib.inf

 [LibraryClasses.common.MM_STANDALONE]
   HobLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/BaseHobLibNull/BaseHobLibNull.inf
@@ -215,6 +216,7 @@
   MdeModulePkg/Application/HelloWorld/HelloWorld.inf
   MdeModulePkg/Application/DumpDynPcd/DumpDynPcd.inf
   MdeModulePkg/Application/MemoryProfileInfo/MemoryProfileInfo.inf
+  MdeModulePkg/Application/MpServicesTest/MpServicesTest.inf

   MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiSortLib/UefiSortLib.inf
   MdeModulePkg/Logo/Logo.inf


IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 17322 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-03 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-20 15:47 [PATCH v2 0/1] MdeModulePkg: Add MpServicesTest.efi to exercise EFI_MP_SERVICES_PROTOCOL Rebecca Cran
2021-09-20 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] MdeModulePkg: Add MpServicesTest application to exercise MP Services Rebecca Cran
2021-11-03 10:54   ` Sami Mujawar [this message]
2021-11-03 17:22     ` [edk2-devel] " Rebecca Cran
     [not found] ` <16A69264F30D2680.28782@groups.io>
2021-10-16  6:32   ` Rebecca Cran
2021-10-16  6:54     ` Sami Mujawar
2021-11-03  2:31       ` Rebecca Cran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2c02b1f0-377f-4c4f-5b9b-cfd80f6a9058@arm.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox