From: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@Intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>,
Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: remove unneeded DBs from IA32 SmmStartup()
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:45:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d8d0dd2-39d0-c939-c9b1-63458b775279@Intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180130153348.31992-3-lersek@redhat.com>
On 1/30/2018 11:33 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> The SmmStartup() executes in SMM, which is very similar to real mode. Add
> "BITS 16" before it and "BITS 32" after it (just before the @32bit label).
>
> Remove the manual 0x66 operand-size override prefixes, for selecting
> 32-bit operands -- the sizes of our operands trigger NASM to insert the
> prefixes automatically in almost every spot. The one place where we have
> to add it back manually is the LGDT instruction. (The 0x67 address-size
> override prefix is also auto-generated.)
>
> This patch causes NASM to generate byte-identical object code (determined
> by disassembling both the pre-patch and post-patch versions, and comparing
> the listings), except:
>
>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
>> 00000142 6689D3 mov ebx,edx
>> 00000145 66B800000000 mov eax,0x0
>> 0000014B 0F22D8 mov cr3,eax
>> -0000014E 67662E0F0155F6 o32 lgdt [cs:ebp-0xa]
>> +0000014E 2E66670F0155F6 o32 lgdt [cs:ebp-0xa]
>> 00000155 66B800000000 mov eax,0x0
>> 0000015B 0F22E0 mov cr4,eax
>> 0000015E 66B9800000C0 mov ecx,0xc0000080
>
> The only difference is the prefix list order, it changes from:
>
> - 0x67, 0x66, 0x2E
>
> to
>
> - 0x2E, 0x66, 0x67
>
> (0x2E is "CS segment override").
>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Ref: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmInit.nasm | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmInit.nasm b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmInit.nasm
> index 08534dba64b7..9231aa5b3ded 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmInit.nasm
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmInit.nasm
> @@ -38,43 +38,42 @@ global ASM_PFX(gcSmmInitTemplate)
>
> ASM_PFX(gcSmiInitGdtr):
> DW 0
> DQ 0
>
> global ASM_PFX(SmmStartup)
> +
> +BITS 16
> ASM_PFX(SmmStartup):
> - DB 0x66
> mov eax, 0x80000001 ; read capability
> cpuid
> - DB 0x66
> mov ebx, edx ; rdmsr will change edx. keep it in ebx.
> DB 0x66, 0xb8 ; mov eax, imm32
> ASM_PFX(gSmmCr3): DD 0
> mov cr3, eax
> - DB 0x67, 0x66
> - lgdt [cs:ebp + (ASM_PFX(gcSmiInitGdtr) - ASM_PFX(SmmStartup))]
> +o32 lgdt [cs:ebp + (ASM_PFX(gcSmiInitGdtr) - ASM_PFX(SmmStartup))]
> DB 0x66, 0xb8 ; mov eax, imm32
> ASM_PFX(gSmmCr4): DD 0
> mov cr4, eax
> - DB 0x66
> mov ecx, 0xc0000080 ; IA32_EFER MSR
> rdmsr
> - DB 0x66
> test ebx, BIT20 ; check NXE capability
> jz .1
> or ah, BIT3 ; set NXE bit
> wrmsr
> .1:
> DB 0x66, 0xb8 ; mov eax, imm32
> ASM_PFX(gSmmCr0): DD 0
> - DB 0xbf, PROTECT_MODE_DS, 0 ; mov di, PROTECT_MODE_DS
> + mov di, PROTECT_MODE_DS
> mov cr0, eax
> DB 0x66, 0xea ; jmp far [ptr48]
> ASM_PFX(gSmmJmpAddr):
> DD @32bit
> DW PROTECT_MODE_CS
> +
> +BITS 32
> @32bit:
> mov ds, edi
> mov es, edi
> mov fs, edi
> mov gs, edi
> mov ss, edi
>
Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
--
Thanks,
Ray
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-31 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-30 15:33 [PATCH 0/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: fix IA32 SmmStartup() regression on KVM Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-30 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: update comments in IA32 SmmStartup() Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-30 17:22 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-01-30 18:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-30 20:31 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-01-30 21:26 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-01-30 21:55 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-30 21:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-30 22:25 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-01-31 5:44 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-01-31 5:54 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-01-31 10:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-31 10:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-31 10:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-31 22:11 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-02-02 6:05 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-02 10:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-02 13:26 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-02 13:28 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-02-02 13:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-30 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: remove unneeded DBs from " Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-31 5:45 ` Ni, Ruiyu [this message]
2018-01-30 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: eliminate conditional jump in " Laszlo Ersek
2018-01-31 5:12 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-01-30 16:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: fix IA32 SmmStartup() regression on KVM Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-31 12:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-02-01 1:20 ` Wang, Jian J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d8d0dd2-39d0-c939-c9b1-63458b775279@Intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox