From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EDC20945BB5 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CCB8C059B68; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:57:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 1CCB8C059B68 Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-87.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.87]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCB417CC0; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:57:35 +0000 (UTC) To: Evan Lloyd , "Yao, Jiewen" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" Cc: "\"Matteo.Carlini@arm.com\"@arm.com" <"Matteo.Carlini@arm.com"@arm.com>, "\"nd@arm.com\"@arm.com" <"nd@arm.com"@arm.com>, "\"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org\"@arm.com" <"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org"@arm.com>, "\"Stephanie.Hughes-Fitt@arm.com\"@arm.com" <"Stephanie.Hughes-Fitt@arm.com"@arm.com>, "\"thomas.abraham@arm.com\"@arm.com" <"thomas.abraham@arm.com"@arm.com>, "\"Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com\"@arm.com" <"Arvind.Chauhan@arm.com"@arm.com>, "\"leif.lindholm@linaro.org\"@arm.com" <"leif.lindholm@linaro.org"@arm.com>, "\"Daniil.Egranov@arm.com\"@arm.com" <"Daniil.Egranov@arm.com"@arm.com> References: <20171002194753.4316-1-evan.lloyd@arm.com> <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A9D7016@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <2e5384d9-9166-8f5c-1fde-006098e9fcd8@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:57:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Dynamic Tables X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:54:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/10/17 20:52, Evan Lloyd wrote: > Hi Jiewen > (I hope that is your personal name, not your surname - but it is a bit hard for us barbarians to tell, sorry.) Meta: I've been shamelessly exploiting the (apparent) custom that @intel.com email addresses come in the following shapes: If my heuristic has been wrong all this time, at least now I'll learn about it :) (Yes, I've noticed the use of commas in some names; they don't help. The order they dictate is not uniform between cultures. Email address schemes are more reliable, within an organization anyway.) Thanks, Laszlo