From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Marcin Wojtas <marcin.wojtas@semihalf.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EmbeddedPkg: add DT platform driver to select between DT and ACPI
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:58:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30863cb5-6ddc-935d-4edb-abe1c8ae1976@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9zBKPncXjCTpR5avBiSedGx-0sd0xz4cCr8EiU6QwhVw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/28/17 12:51, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 March 2017 at 11:49, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 03/28/17 12:43, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Ard,
>>>
>>> On 03/27/17 12:07, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + The entry point for DtPlatformDxe driver.
>>>> +
>>>> + @param[in] ImageHandle The image handle of the driver.
>>>> + @param[in] SystemTable The system table.
>>>> +
>>>> + @retval EFI_ALREADY_STARTED The driver already exists in system.
>>>> + @retval EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES Fail to execute entry point due to lack of
>>>> + resources.
>>>> + @retval EFI_SUCCES All the related protocols are installed on
>>>> + the driver.
>>>> +
>>>> +**/
>>>> +EFI_STATUS
>>>> +EFIAPI
>>>> +DtPlatformDxeEntryPoint (
>>>> + IN EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle,
>>>> + IN EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable
>>>> + )
>>>> +{
>>>> + EFI_STATUS Status;
>>>> + EFI_HANDLE DriverHandle;
>>>> + DT_ACPI_VARSTORE_DATA DtAcpiPref;
>>>> + UINTN BufferSize;
>>>> + VOID *Dtb;
>>>> + UINTN DtbSize;
>>>> + VOID *DtbCopy;
>>>> +
>>>> + //
>>>> + // Check whether a DTB blob is included in the firmware image.
>>>> + //
>>>> + Dtb = NULL;
>>>> + Status = GetSectionFromAnyFv (&gDtPlatformDefaultDtbFileGuid,
>>>> + EFI_SECTION_RAW, 0, &Dtb, &DtbSize);
>>>> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_WARN, "%a: no DTB blob found, defaulting to ACPI\n",
>>>> + __FUNCTION__));
>>>> + DtAcpiPref.Pref = DT_ACPI_SELECT_ACPI;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + //
>>>> + // Get the current ACPI/DT preference from the AcpiDtPref variable.
>>>> + //
>>>
>>> The comment says "AcpiDtPref variable" (which corresponds to the name under which the VFR also refers to the variable), but below the variable services actually get a "DtAcpiPref" argument as variable name.
>>>
>>> Please fix this inconsistency together with the other instances.
>>>
>>>> + BufferSize = sizeof (DtAcpiPref);
>>>> + Status = gRT->GetVariable(L"DtAcpiPref", &gDtPlatformFormSetGuid, NULL,
>>>> + &BufferSize, &DtAcpiPref);
>>>> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_WARN, "%a: no DT/ACPI preference found, defaulting to DT\n",
>>>> + __FUNCTION__));
>>>> + DtAcpiPref.Pref = DT_ACPI_SELECT_DT;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!EFI_ERROR (Status) &&
>>>> + DtAcpiPref.Pref != DT_ACPI_SELECT_ACPI &&
>>>> + DtAcpiPref.Pref != DT_ACPI_SELECT_DT) {
>>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_WARN, "%a: illegal value for DtAcpiPref, defaulting to DT\n",
>>>> + __FUNCTION__));
>>>
>>> Personal request: please replace "illegal" with "invalid".
>>>
>>>> + DtAcpiPref.Pref = DT_ACPI_SELECT_DT;
>>>> + Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER; // trigger setvar below
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + //
>>>> + // Write the newly selected default value back to the variable store.
>>>> + //
>>>> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>>> + Status = gRT->SetVariable(L"DtAcpiPref", &gDtPlatformFormSetGuid,
>>>> + EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE | EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS,
>>>> + sizeof (DtAcpiPref), &DtAcpiPref);
>>>
>>> I suggest to use a macro for the variable name...
>>>
>>>> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>>> + return Status;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (DtAcpiPref.Pref == DT_ACPI_SELECT_ACPI) {
>>>> + //
>>>> + // ACPI was selected: install the gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid GUID as a
>>>> + // NULL protocol to unlock dispatch of ACPI related drivers.
>>>> + //
>>>> + DriverHandle = NULL;
>>>> + Status = gBS->InstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces (&DriverHandle,
>>>> + gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid, NULL, NULL);
>>>> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR,
>>>> + "%a: failed to install gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid as a protocol\n",
>>>> + __FUNCTION__));
>>>> + return Status;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> I think you don't need to create a new controller handle for gEdkiiPlatformHasAcpiGuid; using ImageHandle should be fine.
>>>
>>> (Same for gEfiDevicePathProtocolGuid in InstallHiiPages().)
>>>
>>> Not critical though, just simpler perhaps.
>>>
>>>> + } else if (DtAcpiPref.Pref == DT_ACPI_SELECT_DT) {
>>>> + //
>>>> + // DT was selected: copy the blob into newly allocated memory and install
>>>> + // a reference to it as the FDT configuration table.
>>>> + //
>>>> + DtbCopy = AllocateCopyPool (DtbSize, Dtb);
>>>> + if (DtbCopy == NULL) {
>>>> + return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
>>>> + }
>>>> + Status = gBS->InstallConfigurationTable (&gFdtTableGuid, DtbCopy);
>>>> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to install FDT configuration table\n",
>>>> + __FUNCTION__));
>>>> + FreePool (DtbCopy);
>>>> + return Status;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> Looks good. The original DTB (found in the FV section) lives in flash, generally speaking, right?
>>>
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + ASSERT (FALSE);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + //
>>>> + // No point in installing the HII pages if ACPI is the only description
>>>> + // we have
>>>> + //
>>>> + if (Dtb == NULL) {
>>>> + return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return InstallHiiPages ();
>>>> +}
>>
>> Consider uninstalling the FDT config table / the "has ACPI" protocol if
>> InstallHiiPages() fails and the driver exits with error (it gets
>> unloaded)? My inner pedant wants you to do this, although I do realize
>> that neither the FDT config table nor the NULL "has ACPI" protocol hook
>> back into this driver.
>>
>
> That was my reasoning, yes. I will add a comment to that effect, but I
> am reluctant to break the boot entirely just because we failed to
> register the HII pages.
>
Good point.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-28 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-27 10:07 [PATCH] EmbeddedPkg: add DT platform driver to select between DT and ACPI Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-28 10:43 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-28 10:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-28 10:49 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-03-28 10:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-28 10:58 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30863cb5-6ddc-935d-4edb-abe1c8ae1976@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox