From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 792DB1A1DEE
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2016 06:41:18 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,322,1470726000"; 
 d="scan'208,217";a="1049108662"
Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2016 06:41:18 -0700
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by
 FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:41:18 -0700
Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.102]) by
 SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.91]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:41:16 +0800
From: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
CC: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>, "edk2-devel@lists.01.org"
 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>, "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>, "Zeng, Star"
 <star.zeng@intel.com>, "Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>,
 "lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>, "leif.lindholm@linaro.org"
 <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Thread-Topic: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: make BAR degradation
 dependent on OPROM presence
Thread-Index: AQHSDPZ5xoa7+WYvNk608yyzG3UuyqB1T3WAgAAAQQCAAI0IGQ==
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:41:15 +0000
Message-ID: <31C8ACEA-1414-4C18-8CBC-F39B58489529@intel.com>
References: <1473685561-1418-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
 <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C50385FCEB6@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>,
 <CAKv+Gu_r=68SBKaj6NpHH2zNtm=MXJ6ibJ_Aypo6nO2Gdasd1g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_r=68SBKaj6NpHH2zNtm=MXJ6ibJ_Aypo6nO2Gdasd1g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/PciBusDxe: make BAR degradation dependent on OPROM presence
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:41:19 -0000
Content-Language: zh-CN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You could use IncompatiblePciDevice protocol. If you have no clue I will gi=
ve you more information my tomorrow.

Thanks,
Ray

=1B$B:_=1B(B 2016=1B$BG/=1B(B9=1B$B7n=1B(B12=1B$BF|!$2<8a=1B(B9:16=1B$B!$=
=1B(BArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org<mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro=
.org>> =1B$B<LF;!'=1B(B

On 12 September 2016 at 14:15, Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jie=
wen.yao@intel.com>> wrote:
HI Ard
We should not let MdeModulePkg depend on IntelFrameworkPkg.
You patch violates the dependency rule.
I suggest we figure out other solution to resolve the problem.


Yes, please. And please keep us informed about any solutions you come up wi=
th.

Thanks,
Ard.