From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.230.1589473239271994278 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 09:20:39 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=OZa1he1L; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.232, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:To:In-Reply-To:Cc:References:Message-Id:Date: Mime-Version:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WxCSZFuAnTV7uUx7Ick+QZnkTHWwwEbH0BsQtyE799M=; b=OZa1he1L0onKaKIGK2GEfoK6Fr N2dLNYOuqHpX0XSjn7uFvUXk0YcrAAdK/dXjku/Q5xQWpRRxaAN22QDNUuo4GAtotDcG42jhH16jN 8//Gfs2H4CH5LTpCEWUtCUupjQEfQUg0MaOVhD5v7veFHM/Fv3C5N+rJF/Z6RXKa4NAc=; Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZGb5-0003yQ-PG; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:20:36 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jZGb4-0007xp-Ne; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:20:35 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA181619FF; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:20:34 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id XTiCNikK2l-p; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:20:34 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.145] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DFEB16138E; Thu, 14 May 2020 10:20:33 -0600 (MDT) From: "Rebecca Cran" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 10:20:32 -0600 Message-Id: <32735AC0-2354-4ADB-A4D5-A3D93DA00385@bsdio.com> References: <58b768dc-cad7-08e5-2fe6-ba3e81002097@redhat.com> Cc: michael.d.kinney@intel.com, Ard Biesheuvel , Andrew Fish , Leif Lindholm , "Justen, Jordan L" , Peter Grehan In-Reply-To: <58b768dc-cad7-08e5-2fe6-ba3e81002097@redhat.com> To: devel@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E262) X-XM-SPF: eid=1jZGb4-0007xp-Ne;;;mid=<32735AC0-2354-4ADB-A4D5-A3D93DA00385@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa05.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, XMSubLong,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5004] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa05 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: ; sa05 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;devel@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 855 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 10 (1.2%), b_tie_ro: 9 (1.0%), parse: 0.91 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 3.6 (0.4%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.58 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.5 (0.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.21 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 0.98 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 141 (16.5%), check_bayes: 140 (16.3%), b_tokenize: 4.9 (0.6%), b_tok_get_all: 3.9 (0.5%), b_comp_prob: 1.70 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 126 (14.7%), b_finish: 1.05 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 683 (79.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.59 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 28 (3.3%), poll_dns_idle: 22 (2.6%), tests_pri_10: 1.96 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 8 (0.9%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Where to put the bhyve code in the edk2 repo: BhyvePkg, or under OvmfPkg? X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On May 14, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >=20 > - The community not having any human resources permanently dedicated to > bhyve regressions (testing, review, and post factum fixing) is fine, as > long as the bhyve stakeholders can live with a matching frequency of > regressions. Yes, I believe that would be acceptable.=20 Has there been a decision on the directory structure yet, or is that likely t= o be something that will need resolved at the next Stewards Meeting? =E2=80=94=20 Rebecca Cran=