From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuchenlin@synology.com>
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
 client-ip=59.124.61.242; helo=synology.com;
 envelope-from=yuchenlin@synology.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org 
Received: from synology.com (synology.com [59.124.61.242])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E21621106F21
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Tue,  6 Nov 2018 18:37:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from _ (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by synology.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B9CED23A1C51;
 Wed,  7 Nov 2018 10:37:23 +0800 (CST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=synology.com; s=123;
 t=1541558243; bh=fp5wt1YZO+pOTO78ALDT2DCJK3wDHVGH69SQyuCSJtA=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=PEqFONjDqJB6xcydJrcO3awlhCHCVLesfhDT8bTvmDRqvfnmr1bpV02MjWPEy20dc
 Lku8TE/5GSlrSkMU0ROO20PSWJ+g8UtV+d8x30X79Mex7e+yopn2Ykbx9MOASkjqxb
 0sFJ+P08YSVrMH7uVzglO+5Q323S97xSg4UD2fR0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 10:37:23 +0800
From: yuchenlin <yuchenlin@synology.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org,
 phil@philjordan.eu, jordan.l.justen@intel.com, anthony.perard@citrix.com,
 Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <6d5e3697-6da6-37bb-c47d-a971c6c360d0@redhat.com>
References: <20181102032402.19686-1-yuchenlin@synology.com>
 <20181102032402.19686-6-yuchenlin@synology.com>
 <4d3da28e-42ca-c54e-1efa-c6fc8c9b0fb2@redhat.com>
 <3167b5fd-5514-5a79-e400-39d7c64e50ea@redhat.com>
 <6d5e3697-6da6-37bb-c47d-a971c6c360d0@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <32aa2a67d44a7c1dc219ba6bfa72e832@synology.com>
X-Sender: yuchenlin@synology.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2
X-Synology-MCP-Status: no
X-Synology-Spam-Flag: no
X-Synology-Spam-Status: score=0, required 6, WHITELIST_FROM_ADDRESS 0
X-Synology-Virus-Status: no
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] OvmfPkg: simply use the Bochs interface for vmsvga
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 02:37:25 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 2018-11-06 21:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 6/11/18 14:36, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 11/06/18 12:47, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> 
>>> ... While we discuss this, I'll go ahead and push the first four
>>> patches. The code being reverted is dead anyway. I'll report back 
>>> about
>>> the commit hashes.
>> 
>> Before pushing the first four patches, I regression-tested them as 
>> well.
>> Using: Cirrus, stdvga, and QXL. My QEMU version was
>> v3.0.0-1763-gb2f7a038bb4c. The machine type was "pc-q35-3.0".
>> 
>> For the first four patches:
>> - Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
>> - pushed them as commit range 62ea70e31285..328409ce8de7.
> 
> Thanks Laszlo!
> A bit late, but 1-4 reviewed too.
> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>> 

Thank you for your effort on this series!

Thanks,
yuchenlin