public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Brian J. Johnson" <bjohnson@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, Eugene Cohen <eugene@hp.com>
Cc: Mike Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Alexei Fedorov <Alexei.Fedorov@arm.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>,
	 Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: What is the right way to print a UINTN?
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:14:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <334067f6-b7b6-9fe4-02c6-f8af21982780@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E53E1850-2E9E-4663-BD05-9F443B54387F@apple.com>

On 09/27/2016 11:47 AM, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 9:03 AM, Cohen, Eugene <eugene@hp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Printing UINTN with %x *or* with %d are equally bugs.
>>>
>>> For X64 / AARCH64 / IA64 builds, they are actual bugs (that happen to
>>> work most of the time).
>>
>> Feel free to file a Bugzilla on the extensive usage of this in
>> edk2 [ducking and running]. :)
>>
>>>> I'm envisioning having to create a slide in the future for UEFI
>>>> training about the proper use of UINTNs and describing "If you think
>>>> it may exceed 2^32-1 then upcast to UINT64, otherwise don't worry
>>>> about it" and it makes me squirm.
>>>
>>> It makes me squirm too. I think the slide should recommend the
>>> casting
>>> that I proposed. ;) "There is no conversion specifier dedicated to
>>> UINTN; the portable way to print it is to cast it to UINT64, then print
>>> it with %Lx."
>>
>> This is reasonable although I expect to get asked why a lot of the
>> other code doesn't adhere to this recommendation.
>>
>
> I think this is a historical artifact. The older version of %x in
> the EDK (and early edk2) implied UINTN. We hit an issue with C
> integer math resulting in an int and that seemed to bork some
> toolchains. That is when things changed from UINTN to int. I guess
> the cleanup was practical vs. pedantic.

Thanks for the historical context, Andrew.  It's interesting to hear,
if very unfortunate.

I've written code in the past which uses a #defined value for the
UINTN format character as a way to work around this issue without
casting everything to 64 bits.  Something like:

// Format string for a naturally-sized unsigned integer
#if defined (MDE_CPU_IA32)
#define UINTN_FMT  "0x%08x"
#elif defined (MDE_CPU_X64)
#define UINTN_FMT  "0x%016lx"
#elif ...
   ...
#endif

UINTN Val;
Val = Foo ();
DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "Value is " UINTN_FMT "\n", Val));


I guess it's a matter of opinion if that's preferable to adding casts;
in my particular situation, I had to print values with that particular
format string in a lot of places, so it was convenient to #define it
once.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Fish
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eugene
>> _______________________________________________
>> edk2-devel mailing list
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>


-- 

						Brian J. Johnson

--------------------------------------------------------------------

   My statements are my own, are not authorized by SGI, and do not
   necessarily represent SGI’s positions.


  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-27 17:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-26 13:46 What is the right way to print a UINTN? Cohen, Eugene
2016-09-26 14:39 ` Alexei Fedorov
2016-09-26 15:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-27 12:29   ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-09-27 14:30     ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-27 16:03       ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-09-27 16:31         ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-27 16:47         ` Andrew Fish
2016-09-27 17:14           ` Brian J. Johnson [this message]
2016-09-27 18:31             ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-27 20:27             ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-27 17:27           ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-27 17:46             ` Andrew Fish
2016-09-27 18:20               ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-27 19:28             ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-09-27 20:10               ` Kinney, Michael D

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=334067f6-b7b6-9fe4-02c6-f8af21982780@sgi.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox