From: "Brian J. Johnson" <bjohnson@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, Eugene Cohen <eugene@hp.com>
Cc: Mike Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Alexei Fedorov <Alexei.Fedorov@arm.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: What is the right way to print a UINTN?
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:14:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <334067f6-b7b6-9fe4-02c6-f8af21982780@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E53E1850-2E9E-4663-BD05-9F443B54387F@apple.com>
On 09/27/2016 11:47 AM, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 9:03 AM, Cohen, Eugene <eugene@hp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Printing UINTN with %x *or* with %d are equally bugs.
>>>
>>> For X64 / AARCH64 / IA64 builds, they are actual bugs (that happen to
>>> work most of the time).
>>
>> Feel free to file a Bugzilla on the extensive usage of this in
>> edk2 [ducking and running]. :)
>>
>>>> I'm envisioning having to create a slide in the future for UEFI
>>>> training about the proper use of UINTNs and describing "If you think
>>>> it may exceed 2^32-1 then upcast to UINT64, otherwise don't worry
>>>> about it" and it makes me squirm.
>>>
>>> It makes me squirm too. I think the slide should recommend the
>>> casting
>>> that I proposed. ;) "There is no conversion specifier dedicated to
>>> UINTN; the portable way to print it is to cast it to UINT64, then print
>>> it with %Lx."
>>
>> This is reasonable although I expect to get asked why a lot of the
>> other code doesn't adhere to this recommendation.
>>
>
> I think this is a historical artifact. The older version of %x in
> the EDK (and early edk2) implied UINTN. We hit an issue with C
> integer math resulting in an int and that seemed to bork some
> toolchains. That is when things changed from UINTN to int. I guess
> the cleanup was practical vs. pedantic.
Thanks for the historical context, Andrew. It's interesting to hear,
if very unfortunate.
I've written code in the past which uses a #defined value for the
UINTN format character as a way to work around this issue without
casting everything to 64 bits. Something like:
// Format string for a naturally-sized unsigned integer
#if defined (MDE_CPU_IA32)
#define UINTN_FMT "0x%08x"
#elif defined (MDE_CPU_X64)
#define UINTN_FMT "0x%016lx"
#elif ...
...
#endif
UINTN Val;
Val = Foo ();
DEBUG((DEBUG_INFO, "Value is " UINTN_FMT "\n", Val));
I guess it's a matter of opinion if that's preferable to adding casts;
in my particular situation, I had to print values with that particular
format string in a lot of places, so it was convenient to #define it
once.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Fish
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eugene
>> _______________________________________________
>> edk2-devel mailing list
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
--
Brian J. Johnson
--------------------------------------------------------------------
My statements are my own, are not authorized by SGI, and do not
necessarily represent SGI’s positions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-26 13:46 What is the right way to print a UINTN? Cohen, Eugene
2016-09-26 14:39 ` Alexei Fedorov
2016-09-26 15:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-27 12:29 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-09-27 14:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-27 16:03 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-09-27 16:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-27 16:47 ` Andrew Fish
2016-09-27 17:14 ` Brian J. Johnson [this message]
2016-09-27 18:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-27 20:27 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-27 17:27 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-27 17:46 ` Andrew Fish
2016-09-27 18:20 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-27 19:28 ` Cohen, Eugene
2016-09-27 20:10 ` Kinney, Michael D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=334067f6-b7b6-9fe4-02c6-f8af21982780@sgi.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox