From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.134.136.100; helo=mga07.intel.com; envelope-from=ruiyu.ni@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4E02119376F for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 02:59:41 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2018 02:59:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,261,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="281801653" Received: from ray-dev.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.239.9.22]) ([10.239.9.22]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2018 02:59:39 -0800 To: "Kinney, Michael D" , Leif Lindholm Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "Gao, Liming" , "Richardson, Brian" , "Cetola, Stephano" , Laszlo Ersek References: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BF0FF83@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20181120095728.bupflsmqgmpkun5w@bivouac.eciton.net> From: "Ni, Ruiyu" Message-ID: <346e06f7-f16c-95a8-c162-43f3977a1ec0@Intel.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 19:01:09 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal to remove DuetPkg X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:59:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/21/2018 7:21 AM, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > Ray, > > One additional note. There are some tools in > BaseTools that are only used by Duet. We should > remove those tools too. Good points. Thanks for the reminding. > > Mike > -- Thanks, Ray