From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, "Zhu, Yonghong" <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Jordan Justen (Intel address)" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OvmfPkg/Sec: Fix 64bit SEC build failure
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:02:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35fa258e-96ef-5dfb-cc06-287c3488a75b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171127013831.294104-1-ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Hi Ray,
adding Ard, Jordan, Liming and Yonghong:
On 11/27/17 02:38, Ruiyu Ni wrote:
> Original code breaks a single assembly code to multiple lines.
> But build tool doesn't support such usage in Windows OS environment.
>
> Changing the multiple lines to one line to resolve the build failure.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
> OvmfPkg/Sec/X64/SecEntry.nasm | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Sec/X64/SecEntry.nasm b/OvmfPkg/Sec/X64/SecEntry.nasm
> index 7c55032ac9..d76adcffd8 100644
> --- a/OvmfPkg/Sec/X64/SecEntry.nasm
> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Sec/X64/SecEntry.nasm
> @@ -45,10 +45,8 @@ ASM_PFX(_ModuleEntryPoint):
> ; Fill the temporary RAM with the initial stack value.
> ; The loop below will seed the heap as well, but that's harmless.
> ;
> - mov rax, (FixedPcdGet32 ( \
> - PcdInitValueInTempStack \
> - ) << 32) | \
> - FixedPcdGet32 (PcdInitValueInTempStack) ; qword to store
> + mov rax, (FixedPcdGet32 (PcdInitValueInTempStack) << 32) | FixedPcdGet32 (PcdInitValueInTempStack)
> + ; qword to store
> mov rdi, FixedPcdGet32 (PcdOvmfSecPeiTempRamBase) ; base address,
> ; relative to
> ; ES
>
I'd like to understand more about the build failure. As far as I understand, the NASM tool itself has no problem with the backslash line continuation; before I posted the patch, I checked the NASM manual for this feature.
http://www.nasm.us/doc/nasmdoc3.html#section-3.1
NASM uses backslash (\) as the line continuation character; if a
line ends with backslash, the next line is considered to be a part
of the backslash-ended line.
Now, in "BaseTools/Conf/build_rule.template", I see that we have the following rule for NASM source files:
[Nasm-Assembly-Code-File.COMMON.COMMON]
<InputFile>
?.nasm
<ExtraDependency>
$(MAKE_FILE)
<OutputFile>
$(OUTPUT_DIR)(+)${s_dir}(+)${s_base}.obj
<Command>
"$(PP)" $(PP_FLAGS) $(INC) ${src} > ${d_path}(+)${s_base}.i
Trim --trim-long --source-code -o ${d_path}(+)${s_base}.iii ${d_path}(+)${s_base}.i
"$(NASM)" -I${s_path}(+) $(NASM_FLAGS) -o $dst ${d_path}(+)${s_base}.iii
I guess it's actually the pre-processor (PP) that splices the broken-up lines together, as any C language pre-processor is supposed to do.
Why does that not work with the VS toolchains ("cl.exe")?
Is it perhaps a problem with the _PP_FLAGS?
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3xkfswhy.aspx
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/032xwy55.aspx
"/E" seems right (pre-process). Is /TC the problem? ("C language source code").
If the problem is impossible to fix in BaseTools, I don't mind the patch, but I'd like to see more explanation in the commit message.
(Other assembly files use backslash line continuations too, they just haven't been exposed to VS toolchains yet, apparently.)
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-27 1:38 [PATCH] OvmfPkg/Sec: Fix 64bit SEC build failure Ruiyu Ni
2017-11-27 15:02 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-11-28 10:14 ` Gao, Liming
2017-11-28 13:57 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35fa258e-96ef-5dfb-cc06-287c3488a75b@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox