From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, kraxel@redhat.com
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>,
Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] UefiCpuPkg/BaseXApicX2ApicLib: fix CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY detection
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:09:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <369ade53-91fd-ef41-1624-115f25ec2c70@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017112807.1244254-1-kraxel@redhat.com>
On 10/17/23 13:28, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Checking the max cpuid leaf is not enough to figure whenever
> CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY is supported. Intel SDM says:
>
> Software must detect the presence of CPUID leaf 1FH by verifying
> (a) the highest leaf index supported by CPUID is >= 1FH, and
> (b) CPUID.1FH:EBX[15:0] reports a non-zero value.
>
> The same is true for CPUID leaf 0BH.
>
> This patch adds the EBX check to GetProcessorLocation2ByApicId(). The
> patch also fixes the existing check in GetProcessorLocationByApicId() to
> be in line with the spec by looking at bits 15:0. The comments are
> updated with a quote from the Intel SDM.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241388
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
> ---
> .../BaseXApicX2ApicLib/BaseXApicX2ApicLib.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicX2ApicLib/BaseXApicX2ApicLib.c b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicX2ApicLib/BaseXApicX2ApicLib.c
> index aa4eb11181f6..c0a847583330 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicX2ApicLib/BaseXApicX2ApicLib.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/BaseXApicX2ApicLib/BaseXApicX2ApicLib.c
> @@ -1294,11 +1294,12 @@ GetProcessorLocationByApicId (
> NULL
> );
> //
> - // If CPUID.(EAX=0BH, ECX=0H):EBX returns zero and maximum input value for
> - // basic CPUID information is greater than 0BH, then CPUID.0BH leaf is not
> - // supported on that processor.
> + // Quoting Intel SDM:
> + // Software must detect the presence of CPUID leaf 0BH by
> + // verifying (a) the highest leaf index supported by CPUID is >=
> + // 0BH, and (b) CPUID.0BH:EBX[15:0] reports a non-zero value.
> //
> - if (ExtendedTopologyEbx.Uint32 != 0) {
> + if (ExtendedTopologyEbx.Bits.LogicalProcessors != 0) {
> TopologyLeafSupported = TRUE;
>
> //
> @@ -1424,6 +1425,7 @@ GetProcessorLocation2ByApicId (
> )
> {
> CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_EAX ExtendedTopologyEax;
> + CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_EBX ExtendedTopologyEbx;
> CPUID_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY_ECX ExtendedTopologyEcx;
> UINT32 MaxStandardCpuIdIndex;
> UINT32 Index;
> @@ -1436,10 +1438,19 @@ GetProcessorLocation2ByApicId (
> }
>
> //
> - // Get max index of CPUID
> + // Quoting Intel SDM:
> + // Software must detect the presence of CPUID leaf 1FH by verifying
> + // (a) the highest leaf index supported by CPUID is >= 1FH, and (b)
> + // CPUID.1FH:EBX[15:0] reports a non-zero value.
> //
> AsmCpuid (CPUID_SIGNATURE, &MaxStandardCpuIdIndex, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> if (MaxStandardCpuIdIndex < CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY) {
> + ExtendedTopologyEbx.Bits.LogicalProcessors = 0;
> + } else {
> + AsmCpuidEx (CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY, 0, NULL, &ExtendedTopologyEbx.Uint32, NULL, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + if (ExtendedTopologyEbx.Bits.LogicalProcessors == 0) {
> if (Die != NULL) {
> *Die = 0;
> }
Commit 170d4ce8e90abb1eff03852940a69c9d17f8afe5 (via #4954).
Laszlo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110029): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/110029
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102015439/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/12367111/7686176/1913456212/xyzzy [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-25 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 11:28 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] UefiCpuPkg/BaseXApicX2ApicLib: fix CPUID_V2_EXTENDED_TOPOLOGY detection Gerd Hoffmann
2023-10-17 11:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-10-24 12:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-10-25 10:09 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=369ade53-91fd-ef41-1624-115f25ec2c70@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox