public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chao Li" <lichao@loongson.cn>
To: "Chang, Abner" <Abner.Chang@amd.com>,
	Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>, "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 12:39:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39e2f9d7-d564-4911-aab6-4128e68ed81d@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <LV8PR12MB9452A736C18E20B1AB629136EA742@LV8PR12MB9452.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7229 bytes --]

Hi Abner,

The ExceptionLib is different from other libs such as Mp and Timer. 
Since ExceptionLib can provide for 32-bit service for LoongArch32 in the 
future, 64-bit private files are located in LoongArch/LoongArch64/ and 
the 32-bit will be located in LoongArch/LoongArch32, although the 32-bit 
LoongArch is not upstream yet.


Thanks,
Chao
On 2024/1/23 11:10, Chang, Abner wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> HI all,
> I have no problem with the plan A, except the folder structure under CpuExecptionHandlerLib.
> It has a LoongArch folder that contains the common source files for LoongArch and LoongArch64 folder under LoongArch for 64-buite architecture. This folder structure is different from other lib such as MpInitLib and CpuTimerLib.
> Do you have 32-bit LoongArch? If not for now, then you probably can move the files under LoongArch to LoongArch64. Len you can a consistent folder structure for LoongArch.
>
> Thanks
> Abner
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laszlo Ersek<lersek@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2024 9:48 PM
>> To: Ni, Ray<ray.ni@intel.com>;devel@edk2.groups.io;lichao@loongson.cn;
>> Sunil V L<sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
>> Cc: Kinney, Michael D<michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann
>> <kraxel@redhat.com>; Chang, Abner<Abner.Chang@amd.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
>>
>> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
>> when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>>
>>
>> On 1/19/24 11:17, Ni, Ray wrote:
>>> Chao,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In the plan A, CpuDxe.inf contains reference to
>>> gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuExceptionVectorBaseAddress in [Pcd]
>>> section. But I guess it’s only needed by LoongArch64. That’s why I
>>> didn’t like the common-inf idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But after looking at the other INF changes, I changed my mind. I think
>>> the common-inf looks good as the other INF files don’t have so much
>>> difference between LoonArch and x86.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So, I am ok with plan A. Thanks for preparing both changes for review.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike, Laszlo, Gerd, Abner, any comments?
>> I'm also OK with plan A.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ray
>>>
>>> *From:* Chao Li<lichao@loongson.cn>
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 18, 2024 4:27 PM
>>> *To:* Ni, Ray<ray.ni@intel.com>; Sunil V L<sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
>>> *Cc:*devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
>>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek<lersek@redhat.com>; Gerd
>>> Hoffmann<kraxel@redhat.com>; Abner Chang<abner.chang@amd.com>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ray and Sunil,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I'm late, I have very busy these days.
>>>
>>> I created two PRs in my private repo.
>>>
>>> *Plan A:*
>>>
>>> Moved most of LoongArch libraries and drivers to current matching
>>> folders, removed LoongArch private INF, adjusted common INF.
>>>
>>> URL:https://github.com/kilaterlee/edk2/pull/8
>>> <https://github.com/kilaterlee/edk2/pull/8>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Plan B:*
>>>
>>> Moved most of LoongArch libraries and drivers to current matching
>>> folders, keeping to use LoongArch private INF.
>>>
>>> URL:https://github.com/kilaterlee/edk2/pull/9
>>> <https://github.com/kilaterlee/edk2/pull/9>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> After you reading these two PRs, let's discuss how to deal with INF.
>>>
>>> I prefer plan A, it is better to use the same INF for all ARCHs and have
>>> only one INF per modules. I was discussed this plan with Ray and Abner,
>>> but it was not allowed at the time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chao
>>>
>>> On 2024/1/16 08:59, Chao Li wrote:
>>>
>>>      OK, let me finish this work tomorrow, I'm a little busy today.
>>>
>>>      On 2024/1/15 16:11, Ni, Ray wrote:
>>>
>>>          Yes. Fine to me. Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>          Thanks,
>>>
>>>          Ray
>>>
>>>              -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>>              From: Sunil V L<sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
>> <mailto:sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
>>>              Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 2:46 PM
>>>
>>>              To: Chao Li<lichao@loongson.cn>  <mailto:lichao@loongson.cn>
>>>
>>>              Cc:devel@edk2.groups.io  <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Ni, Ray
>> <ray.ni@intel.com>  <mailto:ray.ni@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
>>>              <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>  <mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>;
>> Laszlo Ersek<lersek@redhat.com>  <mailto:lersek@redhat.com>; Gerd
>>>              Hoffmann<kraxel@redhat.com>  <mailto:kraxel@redhat.com>
>>>
>>>              Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>              On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:17:09PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
>>>
>>>                  Ray and Sunil,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                  I plan send two example PRs to github to  show how to deal the
>> INFs, one to
>>>                  adjust current INF, and another PR to move the libraris to the current
>>>
>>>                  folders. I hope after these two PRs are sent we can decide what to do
>> with
>>>                  the INF. What do you think of this plan?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>              Hi Chao, That's fine with me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>              Thanks,
>>>
>>>              Sunil
>>>
>>>                  Thanks,
>>>
>>>                  Chao
>>>
>>>                  On 2024/1/15 13:44, Ni, Ray wrote:
>>>
>>>                      That will be great!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                      Thanks,
>>>
>>>                      Ray
>>>
>>>                          -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>>                          From: Sunil V L<sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
>> <mailto:sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
>>>                          Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 12:44 PM
>>>
>>>                          To: Ni, Ray<ray.ni@intel.com>  <mailto:ray.ni@intel.com>
>>>
>>>                          Cc:devel@edk2.groups.io;lichao@loongson.cn
>> <mailto:Cc:devel@edk2.groups.io;lichao@loongson.cn>; Kinney, Michael D
>>>                          <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> <mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek<lersek@redhat.com>
>> <mailto:lersek@redhat.com>; Gerd
>>>                          Hoffmann<kraxel@redhat.com>  <mailto:kraxel@redhat.com>
>>>
>>>                          Subject: Re: RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                          On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 01:13:03AM +0000, Ni, Ray wrote:
>>>
>>>                              Sunil,
>>>
>>>                              I am glad that you don't have concern about the direction.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                              "RiscV" is good to me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                          Thanks!, Ray. So, shall I send patches to reorganize this?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                          Thanks,
>>>
>>>                          Sunil
>>>
>>>      
>>>


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#114168): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/114168
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103679850/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12432 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-23  4:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-12  9:12 [edk2-devel] RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg Ni, Ray
2024-01-12  9:57 ` Chao Li
2024-01-12 10:19 ` Sunil V L
2024-01-15  1:13   ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-15  4:44     ` Sunil V L
2024-01-15  5:44       ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-15  6:17         ` Chao Li
2024-01-15  6:46           ` Sunil V L
2024-01-15  8:11             ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-16  0:59               ` Chao Li
     [not found]               ` <17AAAE0FD29564BB.7072@groups.io>
2024-01-18  8:27                 ` Chao Li
2024-01-19 10:17                   ` Ni, Ray
2024-01-19 13:47                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2024-01-23  3:10                       ` Chang, Abner via groups.io
2024-01-23  4:39                         ` Chao Li [this message]
2024-01-23  5:02                           ` Chang, Abner via groups.io
2024-01-15  8:48   ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39e2f9d7-d564-4911-aab6-4128e68ed81d@loongson.cn \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox