From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.269.1589480558217154109 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:22:38 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=bmUqcoXd; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.232, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=g3t45BuOZlE9xAFVBm54E7yO9hAwFVlmhaRjCcXHglw=; b=bmUqcoXd7TKgZVg8NJ2DfVGwhY otyploMAzKJXfQZuGIkfcsN+r+7M97Z5qMse1B7tf3/hOnLOne1RZtwUSAvcyR1mwHr/FjmjC/4Cz 1QpYxA7QY66E4/BKMWZnCXgZ3LIx0QSEMGvZwGRMVA36Kru/kfPYhqTEuP6fbnG/iqdc=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZIV8-0003Wh-4P; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:22:34 -0600 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jZIV6-00039A-FC; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:22:33 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C77E5006EC; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:22:32 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id cbmkGf4On0OT; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:22:32 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5CF2500783; Thu, 14 May 2020 12:22:31 -0600 (MDT) To: Sean Brogan , devel@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com Cc: michael.d.kinney@intel.com, Ard Biesheuvel , Andrew Fish , Leif Lindholm , "Justen, Jordan L" , Peter Grehan References: <58b768dc-cad7-08e5-2fe6-ba3e81002097@redhat.com> <32735AC0-2354-4ADB-A4D5-A3D93DA00385@bsdio.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <39f882ec-c7ba-0abe-7100-e4d3b9c78678@bsdio.com> Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:22:31 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1jZIV6-00039A-FC;;;mid=<39f882ec-c7ba-0abe-7100-e4d3b9c78678@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.68;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa04.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, TooManyTo_002,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4998] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: ; sa04 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Sean Brogan , devel@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1086 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.12 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 13 (1.2%), b_tie_ro: 11 (1.0%), parse: 1.50 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 6 (0.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.33 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.8 (0.4%), tests_pri_-950: 1.60 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 1.29 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 65 (6.0%), check_bayes: 62 (5.7%), b_tokenize: 7 (0.6%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (0.5%), b_comp_prob: 2.5 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 43 (4.0%), b_finish: 1.19 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 977 (90.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.75 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 214 (19.7%), poll_dns_idle: 206 (19.0%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 11 (1.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Where to put the bhyve code in the edk2 repo: BhyvePkg, or under OvmfPkg? X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 5/14/20 11:48 AM, Sean Brogan wrote: > Adding another platform to a core repository that might or might not > work at any given time is a burden to all core contributors and > doesn't bring value to the core project. > > The direction I would like to see is a new repo created at > github.com/tianocore/Bhyve_Platform.git Given I'm a FreeBSD committer but not a TianoCore maintainer, I think I'd prefer to just keep using github.com/freebsd/uefi-edk2.git as the location for bhyve sources in that case, since it's already set up and I have commit access to it. At this point I'm keen to move on from discussing where the code should live, since I'd like to get my changes committed wherever and start creating builds for people who are waiting for them and improve bhyve support in edk2. -- Rebecca Cran