From: "Dandan Bi" <dandan.bi@intel.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
EDK II Development <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Jin, Eric" <eric.jin@intel.com>,
Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>,
Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-core] [PATCH v2 1/1] MdeModulePkg: Make retval in UninstallMultipleProtocol follow Spec
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 01:59:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C0D5C461C9E904E8F62152F6274C0BB40C5AC3A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190910081219.3680-1-xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
Hi ,
Thanks for the update.
I don't know how you send this patch, the format and subject seems a little different from V1 patch. Anyway it doesn't block my review of this patch.
I have two minor comments for the function comments:
1. Per EDKII C Coding Spec, @retval for each unique return value, @return for a function's return values when those values aren't easily described by @retval commands.
So here I think we should use @retval instead of @return.
2. Per my understanding, the protocol interfaces uninstalled prior to the error seems not to be reinstalled in reverse order of uninstalling, the reinstallation seems in the same order of previous uninstalling (start from the first pair after the handle to next...). Please help double check this issue and update the comments if needed .
Since these are the comments update and with these addressed, Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Thanks,
Dandan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heinrich Schuchardt [mailto:xypron.glpk@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 4:12 PM
> To: EDK II Development <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Bi, Dandan
> <dandan.bi@intel.com>
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>;
> Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Yao,
> Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Jin, Eric
> <eric.jin@intel.com>; Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkatesh@arm.com>;
> Stephano Cetola <stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com>; Heinrich Schuchardt
> <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> Subject: [edk2-core] [PATCH v2 1/1] MdeModulePkg: Make retval in
> UninstallMultipleProtocol follow Spec
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1869
>
> The UEFI spec requires that if any error occurs in
> UninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces(), EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER is returned
> and not the return code of UninstallProtocolInterface().
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> ---
> v2
> Adjust the subject line.
> Adjust the function comments to clarify the behavior.
> This replaces https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/46974
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> index b2721b3ab2..719ba98261 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Hand/Handle.c
> @@ -802,20 +802,28 @@ Done:
> - /** Uninstalls a list of protocol interface in the boot services
> environment.- This function calls UnisatllProtocolInterface() in a loop. This
> is+ This function calls UninstallProtocolInterface() in a loop. This is basically a
> lib function to save space. - @param Handle The handle to uninstall
> the protocol+ If any errors are generated while the protocol interfaces are
> being+ uninstalled, then the protocol interfaces uninstalled prior to the error
> will+ be reinstalled in reverse order of uninstalling and
> EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER is+ returned.++ @param Handle The
> handle to uninstall the protocol interfaces+ from. @param ...
> EFI_GUID followed by protocol instance. A NULL- terminates
> the list. The pairs are the+ terminates the list. The pairs are
> the arguments to UninstallProtocolInterface(). All
> the protocols are added to Handle. - @return Status code-+ @return
> EFI_SUCCESS if all protocol interfaces where uninstalled.+ @return
> EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER if any protocol interface could not be+
> uninstalled and an attempt was made to+ reinstall previously
> uninstalled protocol+ interfaces. **/ EFI_STATUS EFIAPI@@ -
> 864,6 +872,7 @@ CoreUninstallMultipleProtocolInterfaces (
> CoreInstallProtocolInterface (&Handle, Protocol, EFI_NATIVE_INTERFACE,
> Interface); } VA_END (Args);+ Status = EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER; }
> return Status;--
> 2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-12 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-10 8:12 [edk2-core] [PATCH v2 1/1] MdeModulePkg: Make retval in UninstallMultipleProtocol follow Spec Heinrich Schuchardt
2019-09-12 1:59 ` Dandan Bi [this message]
2019-09-12 6:18 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C0D5C461C9E904E8F62152F6274C0BB40C5AC3A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox