From: "Gao, Zhichao" <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"'krzysztof.koch@arm.com'" <krzysztof.koch@arm.com>
Cc: "Carsey, Jaben" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>,
"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Acpiview table parsers code style enhancements and refactoring
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 06:29:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CE959C139B4C44DBEA1810E3AA6F9000B81B94F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB478330EB30EEDB5038E6D0DA84C00@VE1PR08MB4783.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
The review work is done. Please wait for the maintainer to push the patch set.
I would remind them if the pending time is too long.
Thanks,
Zhichao
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Krzysztof Koch
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2019 12:33 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Carsey, Jaben <jaben.carsey@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>;
> Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Acpiview table parsers code style
> enhancements and refactoring
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way I can help get this patch merged? I have a couple of small
> patch sets ready to submit but they are pending on this series.
>
> These small sets of patches are a result of me breaking down the "[PATCH v1
> 00/11] Add security checks in the Acpiview table parsers" series into smaller
> functional units as requested in the review comments.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Krzysztof
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 10:57
> To: Krzysztof Koch <Krzysztof.Koch@arm.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: jaben.carsey@intel.com; ray.ni@intel.com; zhichao.gao@intel.com; nd
> <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Acpiview table parsers code style
> enhancements and refactoring
>
> Reviewed-by: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Koch <Krzysztof.Koch@arm.com>
> Sent: 22 July 2019 09:25 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Krzysztof Koch <Krzysztof.Koch@arm.com>
> Cc: jaben.carsey@intel.com; ray.ni@intel.com; zhichao.gao@intel.com; Sami
> Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Acpiview table parsers code style
> enhancements and refactoring
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Just to let you know, only "ShellPkg: acpiview: Allow passing buffer length to
> DumpGasStruct()" is changed compared to v1. I had a wrong understanding
> of how to post revised patches to the upstream community.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Krzysztof
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of
> Krzysztof Koch via Groups.Io
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 8:50
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: jaben.carsey@intel.com; ray.ni@intel.com; zhichao.gao@intel.com; Sami
> Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>; Matteo Carlini
> <Matteo.Carlini@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Acpiview table parsers code style
> enhancements and refactoring
>
> This set of patches consists of a number of changes which make the code
> structure consistent across the existing ACPI table parsers. These are all
> refactoring changes which do not modify the existing functionality of the
> acpiview UEFI shell tool.
>
> Changes can be seen at:
> https://github.com/KrzysztofKoch1/edk2/tree/612_acpiview_code_style_e
> nhance_v2
>
> Krzysztof Koch (6):
> ShellPkg: acpiview: Allow passing buffer length to DumpGasStruct()
> ShellPkg: acpiview: XSDT: Remove redundant ParseAcpi() call
> ShellPkg: acpiview: RSDP: Make code consistent with other parsers
> ShellPkg: acpiview: SRAT: Minor code style enhancements
> ShellPkg: acpiview: MADT: Split structure length validation
> ShellPkg: acpiview: IORT: Refactor PMCG node mapping count validation
>
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/AcpiParser.c | 26
> +++++++++-------
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/AcpiParser.h | 8
> +++--
>
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/Parsers/Dbg2/Dbg2Parser.c
> | 2 +-
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/Parsers/Iort/IortParser.c |
> 32 ++++++++++++++------
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/Parsers/Madt/MadtParser.
> c | 30 +++++++++++++-----
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/Parsers/Rsdp/RsdpParser.c
> | 11 +++++--
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/Parsers/Srat/SratParser.c |
> 3 +-
> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellAcpiViewCommandLib/Parsers/Xsdt/XsdtParser.c
> | 18 +++--------
> 8 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 'Guid(CE165669-3EF3-493F-B85D-6190EE5B9759)'
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-29 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <15B3AB4E8413227A.7925@groups.io>
2019-07-22 8:24 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] Acpiview table parsers code style enhancements and refactoring Krzysztof Koch
2019-07-23 9:56 ` Sami Mujawar
2019-07-26 16:33 ` Krzysztof Koch
2019-07-29 6:29 ` Gao, Zhichao [this message]
2019-08-01 2:32 ` Gao, Zhichao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CE959C139B4C44DBEA1810E3AA6F9000B81B94F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox