From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=210.71.195.41; helo=out01.hibox.biz; envelope-from=kevin.davis@insyde.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from out01.hibox.biz (out01.hibox.biz [210.71.195.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF7B21B02822 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:41:19 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2AKAACX7f5b/w00GKxjGgEBAQEBAgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEHAgEBAQGBUwMBAQEBCwGBDQF1ZoECJ4N5g0qQVoINhAqNZIVUgXoNGAEKhEk?= =?us-ascii?q?CgywiNgcNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFPAEBAQEDAQEhSxsBCg0EBAEBHQ4CAhkOAScIB?= =?us-ascii?q?gESCxCDBgGCBAynIIEvGgKKDQWCfodWgUKBVz+EI4MeAQSBZoJ8MYImAqAbBwK?= =?us-ascii?q?GfYYYhBwYiXwDhxaGaIIOhF6KdIFNCicngS5NI1AqAYJBixyFP0IwjmoBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,291,1539619200"; d="scan'208,217";a="29118568" Received: from unknown (HELO hb3-BKT203.hibox.biz) ([172.24.52.13]) by out01.hibox.biz with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2018 03:41:16 +0800 Received: from unknown (HELO hb3-BKT103.hibox.biz) ([172.24.51.13]) by hb3-BKT203.hibox.biz with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2018 03:41:16 +0800 Received: from unknown (HELO hb3-IN04.hibox.biz) ([172.24.12.14]) by hb3-BKT103.hibox.biz with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2018 03:41:16 +0800 X-Remote-IP: 52.125.132.226 X-Remote-Host: No hostname X-SBRS: None X-MID: 19535751 X-Auth-ID: kevin.davis@insyde.com X-EnvelopeFrom: kevin.davis@insyde.com hiBox-Sender: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.outlook.com) ([52.125.132.226]) by hb3-IN04.hibox.biz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 29 Nov 2018 03:41:16 +0800 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 19:40:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin D Davis Sender: Kevin D Davis To: "Tomas Pilar (tpilar)" , Message-ID: <3FEC98D0C33031D6.ECA1E851-8FDA-41DC-95BD-C8AC139D248D@mail.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <1d931e1b-a9fb-1f44-cbbb-20971b9a344b@solarflare.com> References: <1d931e1b-a9fb-1f44-cbbb-20971b9a344b@solarflare.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Outlook for iOS and Android X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: Pkcs7 crypto verification without openSSL X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 19:41:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 =20 =20 =09 =09Tom, Let me know if you get any useful offline answers. =C2=A0From our experienc= e, there are some licensed 3rd party solutions that are tiny but aren=E2=80= =99t cheap. =C2=A0 The problem is parts of any encryption runs the risk of triggering governme= nt laws about encryption. =C2=A0So the owners of Tianocore made the decisio= n to pull in OpenSSL as a whole to put the problem onto the user of TC. =C2= =A0 Making smaller versions of OpenSSL means you have a lot of work to incorpor= ate newer versions.=C2=A0 =09 =09Kevin =20 From: edk2-devel on behalf of Tomas Pil= ar (tpilar) Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 11:40 AM To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org Subject: [edk2] Pkcs7 crypto verification without openSSL=C2=A0Hi, Are there any plans for a crypto library that does not pull in openSSL? Whe= n I try to add BaseCryptLib to be able to use FmpAuthenticationLib, my driv= er size baloons significantly (increase of ~0x30000) and it seems like a ba= sic public SHA256 crypto check library should not be _that_ large? Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel